CallyRed
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2009
- Messages
- 12,420
Chelsea are essentially Watford, but with trophies
Yes but long term they had far more money to play with. I don’t think they’ll be continuing spending 300 mill each summer. It was in the sale they had to commit a certain amount of investment into the squad and the stadium, once that’s done I don’t see the spending staying as high.This is just business as usual for Chelsea isn’t it?
I think Boehly is going to destroy Chelsea FC. From a scattergun transfer window of weird signings and no real planning, just getting what other teams are after.
To now sacking Tuchel after a few bad results.
Seems very volatile and not a good sign for the future.
Discuss
Indeed. I wouldn't mind having a flat in Chelsea either.Fingers crossed. They started the oil money hostile takeover of the Premier League.
Good residence.
Disagree with opening post. Apparently the signings made were decided by the club not tuchel so they knew he was a goner.
Chelsea have a vision for a more collaborative approach and developing players. Neither of which tuchel was doing according to bbc.
If the owner does carry on with the abramovich approach to managers they will carry on being successful. Works for them. They have won alot more in the past decade than we have.
It's not fear if you want it to happen.Doom and fear mongering. They will be fine.
Indeed. I wouldn't mind having a flat in Chelsea either.
They're just playing FM, hoping to get lucky.Bit premature, it seems they at least tried to appoint Michael Edwards so they are looking for a sporting director and they seem to be trying for Potter who is an excellent coach. Maybe he should have let the previous framework stay and help with recruitment this summer but it was a bit of a weird time to let Roman's people stay in place. Tuchel's ability was also vastly overblown.
They're just playing FM, hoping to get lucky.
Edwards seems to specialize in finding gems, yet Boely wants to make big statement signings. It doesn't make sense.Nothing I see tells me that. They already tried for Michael Edwards, seems they want to put people in the right positions to me.
Edwards seems to specialize in finding gems, yet Boely wants to make big statement signings. It doesn't make sense.
Chelsea are a pretty mediocre club who have been financially doped to achieve some great success, although never domination. Would not be surprising if the departure of the sugar daddy behind said doping means they go back to where they belong.
He surely must have a replacement ready?
Im not sure why any manager would want the Chelsea job, it'll only last 6-8 months. I suppose one upside is that if they agree a long contract Chelsea will pay up the remainder to get rid of them early. Although potter would be a good appointment, im not sure he has a large enough profile for the players.
That's giving way too much credit to Boehly. The Dodgers have a collaborative approach set up by their president of baseball operations (who was a former GM ie a DOF), Andrew Friedman. The guy is so good at his job and setting up that culture that Boehly comes across as arrogant for thinking he can replicate Friedman's success.The same team runs the dodgers and they are quite well managed. Tuchel was going to always be on the way out as he was hired prior to the new ownership.
I think Boehly is going to destroy Chelsea FC. From a scattergun transfer window of weird signings and no real planning, just getting what other teams are after.
To now sacking Tuchel after a few bad results.
Seems very volatile and not a good sign for the future.
Discuss
Yes but this is only what 4 maybe 6 bad results?
Disagree with opening post. Apparently the signings made were decided by the club not tuchel so they knew he was a goner.
Chelsea have a vision for a more collaborative approach and developing players. Neither of which tuchel was doing according to bbc.
If the owner does carry on with the abramovich approach to managers they will carry on being successful. Works for them. They have won alot more in the past decade than we have.
Yes but this is only what 4 maybe 6 bad results?
That's giving way too much credit to Boehly. The Dodgers have a collaborative approach set up by their president of baseball operations (who was a former GM ie a DOF), Andrew Friedman. The guy is so good at his job and setting up that culture that Boehly comes across as arrogant for thinking he can replicate Friedman's success.
He comes across as impatient, which was the opposite of the Dodgers. It took them a while to replace their manager after the ownership group took over.
He is so-called interim director of football.Is it really Todd Boehly picking players? I don't think so, I'd imagine there's a team for that. He seems to be raising his head above the parapet in terms of negotiations (and overall I think Chelsea made some questionable deals) but I'm not sure you can entirely blame him for that if he's working to what the club want and you certainly can't blame him for Tuchel's poor form as manager.
I reckon he's just an easy target as he's seen as this clueless American bloke so he's immediately not going to get much credit. But let's see, he'll have to own the managerial decision and as always in football your manager covers over a lot or makes things worse.
Yeah. The second I saw that Matt Law article about Boehly wanting to be involved and bounce ideas off the coach as their new culture... That's when you know they're fecked. Football is very much a "know your place" sort of thing. Boehly seems excited and eager and all, but he's clueless and he's blown 280m on players who don't really make them better bar Sterling. Whoever they get as manager, if the owners want to have that much control on football side, they'll be a bit fecked long term. Might have good years here and there, but it never works when the owner wants to be the center of attention.
Interesting, that seems bizarre. I wonder what the meaning of that is, whether he's making unilateral decisions or it really just symbolises his role in facilitating deals. It would be incredibly strange to think a smart man like that is just throwing money at names he's Googled.He is so-called interim director of football.