GlastonSpur
Also disliked on an Aston Villa forum
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2007
- Messages
- 17,716
- Supports
- Spurs
The fee is not 'allegedly'. It's fact.As you said, allegedly, just like the fee, really. I doubt it's 30.75m straight cash.
The fee is not 'allegedly'. It's fact.As you said, allegedly, just like the fee, really. I doubt it's 30.75m straight cash.
He's scored 77 goals in 147 appearances for his club. It's not as if he has no track record prior to Euro 2008.Not so much a flop, but nowhere near as good as people expect. When Ramos was talking about him he talked about how well Pavlyuchenko played in the Euro's, and it's normally a bad idea to buy a player almost wholly on the back of a good tournament.
The fee is not 'allegedly'. It's fact.
He's scored 77 goals in 147 appearances for his club. It's not as if he has no track record prior to Euro 2008.
He's scored 77 goals in 147 appearances for his club. It's not as if he has no track record prior to Euro 2008.
In the Russian League. Maybe he will do well, I just think that if Pogrebnyak wasn't injured for Russia at the Euro's you wouldn't have even considered Pavlyuchenko, never mind spent £14m on him.
Sounds just like Dirk Kuyt!!!!!!!!!Pavlyuchenko was industrious, and had a certain battling nature to him. But he missed far more than he scored and seemed fortunate to get his 3 goals. He may surprise me but he certainly isn't a replacement for a talent like Berbatov.
It won't wash you trying to pretend that 30.75m - plus a loan player that you could have sold for 7m - is a bad deal for Spurs for a player who will soon be 28 years old.
Any higher money on offer from Man. City is irrelevant, because Berbs wouldn't have signed for them in any case.
We attracted Carrick and Berbatov, just as we've attracted Modric, Bentley and others this summer. And Arshavin was very keen to come, but his club wanted more than we valued him at. Your theory about Spurs not being able to attract excellent players is clearly nonsense.
It's not all about forwards you know. We've improved our midfield and back 5.
Besides, even if don't regard Bent as 'good foward', I do. And who is to say that Pavyluchenko won't be good: dismissing him before he's even kicked a ball in the Prem is stupid.
Yes I have. I am a Manchester United fan.So we are 'lightweight' because we've sold more players than we've bought? Give me strength.
Ever heard of quality vs quantity?
Well, our midfield competed well away against Chelsea in the last match. Not that it dominated the match, but it certainly prevented such midfield 'heavyweights' as Essien, Lampard and Deco from dominating the match.... I still think it's a somewhat flimsy, inexperienced midfield that will struggle to dominate matches in the PL - especially against the top four.
He's effectively a replacement because he barely played last season due to the success of the keane/berbs partnership. He was also bought with one eye looking ahead to Berbs departure.How is Bent a replacement when they bought him one year before selling Keane and Berbatov?
He was backed. But that doesn't mean it's always worth paying over the odds and you have to be prepared to walk away from some deals. I won't be suprised if Arshavin arrives this January for a lot less money than originally demanded.... why was Ramos not backed in his desire to get Arshavin?
They also lost Corluka to Spurs. And as with Pavyluchenko it remains to be seen how well Jo and Robinho will do in the Prem. Those expecting City to be challenging for top 4 are likely to be wide of the mark in my view.I certainly don't think I over-egged City. I actually rate their squad, their manager, and their signings this summer. Hughes is excellent, and Jo, Wright-Phillips and Robinho are some nice signings to say the least.
Absolutely spot on there man. The runour was that Levy is in charge of gettin Spurs into the Champions League & then its sell up & get the feck outta dodge time!But it won't be paid up front, that's for sure.
Of course Levy and co will be very careful to massage the facts to make it seem as though Tottenham Hotspur PLC. got the best deal possible. Something I'm sure Gill was willing to let them do, in order to secure the best deal possible for United.
At the end of the day, this summer has only confirmed what we all know already. Levy's main priority is increasing the value of the stock he holds in your club, with a view to making shit-loads of cash when he sells up. And he's willing to risk ongoing success on the pitch to do so. Which would piss me off, if I was a Spurs fan.
You're probably completely oblivious to this, mind you, what with your famous blinkers view-point about all things Spurs.
They also lost Corluka to Spurs. And as with Pavyluchenko it remains to be seen how well Jo and Robinho will do in the Prem. Those expecting City to be challenging for top 4 are likely to be wide of the mark in my view.
I'm sure it won't also, but that's not surprising - very few deals are all paid up front in one go.But it won't be paid up front, that's for sure.
There is only one fact - 30.25m plus a season loan of Campbell - so nothing much to massage and nothing that needs massaging. It's a very good price for Berbatov from Spurs point of view and there's no getting away from that.Of course Levy and co will be very careful to massage the facts to make it seem as though Tottenham Hotspur PLC. got the best deal possible.
It's funny. Prior to this summer there have been loads of posts on here talking about how much Spurs have spent on players and wondering where all the money comes from.At the end of the day, this summer has only confirmed what we all know already. Levy's main priority is increasing the value of the stock he holds in your club, with a view to making shit-loads of cash when he sells up.
There is only one fact - 30.25m plus a season loan of Campbell - so nothing much to massage and nothing that needs massaging. It's a very good price for Berbatov from Spurs point of view and there's no getting away from that.
You don't regard that deal as the best possible? Then how much were you expecting Levy to get and how could he have gotten more? It's more than almost all most CAFtards were predicting (a hell of lot more in many cases) and more than even I predicted.
It's funny. Prior to this summer there have been loads of posts on here talking about how much Spurs have spent on players and wondering where all the money comes from.
But now, given a single window in which Spurs take in more money than they spend, the argument swings round to the opposite and suddenly Levy becomes a tight-wad who is only interested in lining shareholder's pockets. Go figure.
I'm sure there are endless excuses you can invent to bolster your flimsy claim that Spurs don't attract excellent players.... "attracted" Carrick from a relegated West Ham, and with that competition? Berbatov you wouldn't have got either if United had been a bit faster off the mark in registering their interest.
I might as well ask how long before Ronaldo leaves? Next summer wouldn't be a bad guess. What do you think?In addition the players you listed then left the club, to quote "further their careers". How long before Modric, Bently etc do the same? 18 months, 2 years, what do you think?
You said that Spurs had sold their "only two good forwards". Which clearly implies that Bent and Pavyluchenko are not good.Well I will leave that to stupid people then... however I NEVER dismissed him ...
If he was already seen as 'world class', then how strange that Spurs got him for just 10.9m.
You talk about his performance in his first Prem season, but that's with the benefit of hindsight.
I'm not saying that Spurs made him into a world class player, though clearly he has developed further in the last two years, but I am saying that Spurs have a good track record for the early signing of players who later either develop into becoming excellent or become much more widely recognised as being excellent. There's no good reason to suppose that the same won't happen with Modric, Bale, Dos Santos and several others.
Lightweight in what sense? A 5-man midfield of Huddlestone, Jenas, Bentley, Modric and Dos Santos possesses plenty of quality and potential in my book.
We have lost the best attacking partnership in the Prem, but in exchange for 51m and a squad that is overall stronger and better balanced in my view.
Pavyluchenko is unproven in the Prem, but so is any player coming into the Prem from a foreign league, so what's new? He may turn out to be excellent for all you know and you certainly have no grounds for calling him 'lightweight'.
And he and Campbell are not our only replacements. We also have Bent, who barely featured last season for understandable reasons, but who now comes into his own and who is proven in the Prem.
We shall see what happens this season. Your over-egging of City is wildly premature.
Top 6.Right Glaston, I want a straight honest answer here, where do you think Spurs will finish this season?
Top 6.
There is only one fact - 30.25m plus a season loan of Campbell - so nothing much to massage and nothing that needs massaging. It's a very good price for Berbatov from Spurs point of view and there's no getting away from that.
Aw come on, that;s not a straight answer. 5th or 6th? Which one?
I could have seen you finishing 5th if you had a defensive midfielder, or if your midfield started to gel quicker than it has, but I can't see you finishing 5th now.
Levy is wealthy enough already - I doubt that making even more money is his main motive. It's absurd to deny his ambitions for the club on the pitch: the money he has made available in the last 3 years (since Jol was appointed) shows this beyond disputing.He's not a tight-wad. He's a business-man, looking to make as much money as possible out of your club. A bit like all owners, to be honest.
We don't yet know how Pavlyuchenko will perform and we already know that Bent is a proven quality striker at Prem level. If we mainly play this season with a lone striker up front - and I think we will - then it remains to be seen whether we will be 'clearly short' in the top-class striking department. It's possible that you may be right, but equally possible that you may not be.At the end of the day, Spurs are very clearly short of a top-class striker, a DM and (arguably) another centre-half. Which means there;s not a hope in hell of you nicking fourth.
Shortage of cash has never been the issue this summer. I doubt Veloso would have signed in any case. Arshavin was simply over-priced: not that we couldn't have paid the asking price but rather that the club clearly didn't think it worth paying so much - and as I've said earlier I won't be surprised to see him arrive this January for a much lower price once Zenit have come to their senses.If Levy had been a bit less stubborn about Berbatov and freed up some decent cash for Ramos to sign the likes of Veloso, Kanoute, Arshavin or Milito, you would be very well set for the season ahead. As it is, it's gonna be the same old same old for Spurs. And you know it.
In the Russian League. Maybe he will do well, I just think that if Pogrebnyak wasn't injured for Russia at the Euro's you wouldn't have even considered Pavlyuchenko, never mind spent £14m on him.
If you wish to have such a precise prediction then I'll go for 6th, because it may well take so many new players a while to gel and in some cases adapt to the Prem.Aw come on, that's not a straight answer. 5th or 6th? Which one?
I could have seen you finishing 5th if you had a defensive midfielder, or if your midfield started to gel quicker than it has, but I can't see you finishing 5th now.
Levy is wealthy enough already - I doubt that making even more money is his main motive.
Where do you predict MUFC will finish? My guess is 3rd behind Chelsea and Liverpool, because:
* Whilst Berbatov is clearly a great new asset, I have a feeling that Ronaldo won't perform to anything like same levels as last season (his mind elsewhere perhaps?)
Where do you predict MUFC will finish? My guess is 3rd behind Chelsea and Liverpool, because:.
Have we signed him yet?
If you wish to have such a precise prediction then I'll go for 6th, because it may well take so many new players a while to gel and in some cases adapt to the Prem.
Corluka has played in the DM position many times.
Where do you predict MUFC will finish? My guess is 3rd behind Chelsea and Liverpool, because:
* Chelsea look strong this season
* Whilst Berbatov is clearly a great new asset, I have a feeling that Ronaldo won't perform to anything like same levels as last season (his mind elsewhere perhaps?)
* Your several ageing players become more and more of an issue and I'm not convinced that the newer replacements will make the step up as much as needed.