Litch
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2013
- Messages
- 10,712
Giggs lasting until 40, and Scholes until 36 is an exception, not a rule. One of the reasons they lasted that much was their natural fitness, but they also took great care, training regime, food, desire to play.. just because Giggs, or Javier Zanetti can do it, doesn't mean that every top player could do it.
Also we are not talking about just getting a player, we are buying him. Is it worth the risk to pay 30 years old, albeit world class player, when for that money you could get Strootman, who is almost as good. Or you could add money, and try to get Vidal / Pogba or maybe even Kroos. I still think Kroos is a better option of the two.
That said, depending on the money United has available for Van Gaal for this summer, I am not saying that we should NOT get him, I just think we should try to get other players first..
Also I don't actually think that Bayern would sell him in the first place, so this is just more of a "what if"...
P.S. Also have in mind that the fact that club sign's him doesn't mean he is actually fit enough to play for the next 4+ years, remember Hargreaves ? He had an injury in Bayern, returned to fitness, played one great season for United and then he's career was over...
I agree with this. I think we need to sign player with something to prove and not who their best days are behind them. For me might be a good stopgap but those other potential younger signings just move further away from us, and this is the problem with this type of signing. We should have learned from the Pogba v scholes situation.