Rado_N
Yaaas Broncos!
We were gonna play him at LB anyway. We heard he's got crabs and Althetic don't even love him. We don't even care.
#relaxed
It's all BS as they briefed that they weren't willing to pay £40m for Laporte as he's too expensive for his age. Then surely paying £45m+ for Stones who's 1 day younger than Laporte, less experienced and less of a finished article won't happen?So does it mean they were in for him but since he turned them downed he was too expensive? Or that they were never in for him cause he was too expensive?
55m in pounds? We're not that far off it, really, feck, PSG paid 50 for Luiz.Weird choice from him, I can understand that he didn't want to go to City, but surely he realizes that he's basically stuck in Bilbao for the next 5 years, because nobody's gonna pay €70m for a defender, not even clubs that can pull money our of their asses, like City or PSG.
55m in pounds? We're not that far off it, really, feck, PSG paid 50 for Luiz.
Pretty sure it was £.They paid €50m, not pounds. I personally don't think anyone will go higher that that for a defender, but you never know.
Weird choice from him, I can understand that he didn't want to go to City, but surely he realizes that he's basically stuck in Bilbao for the next 5 years, because nobody's gonna pay €70m for a defender, not even clubs that can pull money our of their asses, like City or PSG.
It was, yes.Pretty sure it was £.
Yeah, not exactly like Athletic Club are a no mark team. Still shudder at the manner they outclassed us a few years back.He's 22, he loves the club, what's the problem?
The likes or Götze would have done well to make a decision like Laporte.
Pretty sure it was £.
To be fair, your instincts were right in thinking no-one in their right minds would pay £50m for David Luiz. You just failed to account for insanity.Just checked wikipedia, you guys are right, it was pounds. My bad.
ThanksNo it's €65m that rises to €70m in 2018.
That's not true at allJust for comparison's sake, how much is Varane's release clause?
Also, IMO the move from Laporte doesn't make sense. Surely, Athletic wouldn't be his dream club. Everyone fancies a dream to RM, Barca, Bayern, maybe us. You can always reject a club you don't want to play for(City or any other club) but signing a release clause basically enslaves him to Athletic.
That's not true at all
Le Tissier stayed at Southampton despite the attraction from elsewhere. They are countless other players like that. Francesco Totti is another. Gabriel Batistuta was also loyal to Fiorentina. And its not a lack of ambition either.
Not once in the last 2 years. Before that im not sure but i highly doubt it. He's just not a LB. Never will be.Has Laporte ever played left back?
Yes, but he has built his reputation as one of the best young left sided CB's in the world, so let's play him at LB.Has Laporte ever played left back?
That's not true at all
Le Tissier stayed at Southampton despite the attraction from elsewhere. They are countless other players like that. Francesco Totti is another. Gabriel Batistuta was also loyal to Fiorentina. And its not a lack of ambition either.
So City didnt go in for him because he was too expensive for a young defender.... and they want Stone...
ok
I wouldn't expect too much sharing on Laporte's part, Basque PR is to tow the line - they'll spin it as committing longterm
Nice to hear that."The family, my teammates, the fans and the club have helped me to make this decision. They wanted to keep me here and I am very happy here since I came to Bilbao. I have signed a new deal and I am very grateful to the club.
"There have been several clubs interested. They were very exciting and attractive projects but in the end you have to make a decision and I have made mine. I hope everything goes well. I thank the clubs that have been interested because it means that I was doing things right and so I have to keep like that at Athletic."
Le Tissier, Totti are from their youth academy and locals to the country and city respectively, Batistuta stayed because Fiorentina were doing well. But Laporte has no such reason. He won't be winning League or cups with Bilbao. He isn't in CL next season, and Bilbao are basically competing for that last CL spot.
I agree he may be ridiculously loyal, but in today's age, its never rewarded.
Imagine there to be a scenario where he has a fight with manager or falls down the pecking order. In situations such as these, he would want to leave and fast. A release clause of 70m will basically mean he'll not find suitors that easily. ANd sure, Bilbao can sell him for less than that, but when did it last happen! Herrera had to pay 5m from his pocket to join us and Laporte may well have to do something similar
Batistuta left for Roma in 2000 (and won the league)Fiorentina were relegated but Batistuta stayed with them.
Batistuta left for Roma in 2000 (and won the league)
Fiorentina were relegated in 2002 (though the extent of their financial woes started to become clear in 2001)
Le Tissier, Totti are from their youth academy and locals to the country and city respectively, Batistuta stayed because Fiorentina were doing well. But Laporte has no such reason. He won't be winning League or cups with Bilbao. He isn't in CL next season, and Bilbao are basically competing for that last CL spot.
I agree he may be ridiculously loyal, but in today's age, its never rewarded.
Imagine there to be a scenario where he has a fight with manager or falls down the pecking order. In situations such as these, he would want to leave and fast. A release clause of 70m will basically mean he'll not find suitors that easily. ANd sure, Bilbao can sell him for less than that, but when did it last happen! Herrera had to pay 5m from his pocket to join us and Laporte may well have to do something similar