The Man Himself
asked for a tagline change and all I got was this.
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2013
- Messages
- 22,406
Smith is currently easily the best test batsman in the world.
Me neither, but has bowled very well so far.Never seen Kuldeep Yadav play
Smith is currently easily the best test batsman in the world.
Me neither, but has bowled very well so far.
Australia have already let slip the massive advantage they built up over the first session.
Great match already.
India 248/6 trailing by 52.What was the score by close of play? Still three down or not..
India 248/6 trailing by 52.
The problem is we can't play 5 bowlers without all our batsmen fit. Feels like we're playing with about 3 batsmen at the moment.
Plus it's way over the top. There's only so many overs you can bowl, unless you have a genuine all-rounder 5 is too much. One of them won't bowl enough to make enough of a contribution.
Our tail starts at #5 now.
Karun needs to feck off. Living off a 300 vs a garbage team.
Iyer.To be fair, we dont have anyone deserves to replace him. Rohit is normally shit, so it will have to be another debutant. Maybe Iyer? Pandey? Not sure who else has been good in domestic.
Plus it's way over the top. There's only so many overs you can bowl, unless you have a genuine all-rounder 5 is too much. One of them won't bowl enough to make enough of a contribution.
Plus it's way over the top. There's only so many overs you can bowl, unless you have a genuine all-rounder 5 is too much. One of them won't bowl enough to make enough of a contribution.
Are you basing that on a game where Kohli is injured?It's weird isn't it. Rather than have Ashwin's batting a point of strength coming in at 7 or 8 he's batting a place too high at 6. Sure you can get away with it at times and against certain teams, but I'm not at all convinced it is actually beneficial.
It's weird isn't it. Rather than have Ashwin's batting a point of strength coming in at 7 or 8 he's batting a place too high at 6. Sure you can get away with it at times and against certain teams, but I'm not at all convinced it is actually beneficial.
Are you basing that on a game where Kohli is injured?
KL, Vijay, Pujara, Kohli, Rahane, Karun/Iyer, Saha, Ashwin, Jadeja, Bhuvi, Umesh has plenty of batting depth.
Ashwin wouldn't be playing at 6 if Kohli was fit is what I'm saying. He's fine at 7 or 8, with Saha at 7 who has displayed good application this series.Its not like Kohli's injury has led to a batsman less playing. This is a team balance that he's on record saying he likes (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...-bowlers-Virat-Kohli/articleshow/53308006.cms) and has been picked frequently.
I agree that that side has more depth, but thats precisely my point.
Ashwin wouldn't be playing at 6 if Kohli was fit is what I'm saying. He's fine at 7 or 8, with Saha at 7 who has displayed good application this series.
As for 5 bowlers, the 5th bowler added was Kuldeep and he did well in the first innings, in fact if not for him the game and the series could be over so I'm not sure that can be criticised.
They went with 6 specialist batsmen + Saha, Ashwin, Jadeja in the last game so that could have been the case again.Depends on the team composition they wanted. Had Kohli been fit I'm not at all sure they'd have gone with the team you suggested and would have instead dropped Nair and played 5 specialist batsman with Ashwin at 6 – a team that they've picked frequently since Kohli became captain.
It's a difficult conundrum because, as well as Kuldeep bowled, you can't help but feel they're now a batsman short and will possibly concede a first innings lead because of it. You can see why they like the flexibility of it, but I'm still not convinced it's a good idea.