Andy Cole/Keith Gillespie with Newcastle?£43m + Nani is crazy money. When was the last time we were involved in an exchange of players ?
Andy Cole/Keith Gillespie with Newcastle?£43m + Nani is crazy money. When was the last time we were involved in an exchange of players ?
We're currently earning crazy money, without Champions League.£43m + Nani is crazy money. When was the last time we were involved in an exchange of players ?
To be fair Nani is only valued at around £10M these days.£43m + Nani is crazy money. When was the last time we were involved in an exchange of players ?
We're currently earning crazy money, without Champions League.
We can afford to go nuts.
Smalling.Berbatov deal had a Frazier Campbell year long loan attached to it, but full transfer of players' rights, was it really Ashley Cole?
Been a lot of part-exchange rumors though this season for some reason; Hernandez for Shaw, Shinji for Hummels, Nani for Vidal, somebody I can't remember for Vermaelen. Maybe with FFP this kind of deal will become more likely. Real were offering a number of players for James, there were rumors of a Di Maria-Veratti swap, maybe this is just normal rumors in silly season though
We're currently earning crazy money, without Champions League.
We can afford to go nuts.
£43m + Nani is crazy money. When was the last time we were involved in an exchange of players ?
To be fair Nani is only valued at around £10M these days.
£10million for Nani? If we're lucky. Very lucky.
Vidal is worth easily £50million+ even at 27, as one of the elite central midfielders in Europe.
These ~£30million quotes are nonsense unless Juventus are completely broke or something.
They are broke. And Vidal isn't worth £50m+ (ridiculous suggestion). A top cm, but he isn't quite the top cm in the world. Somewhere between €40-50m or £30-40m is his true valuation.
Aye a ridiculous suggestion.
When top players now are being sold for £50-100million, I think ~£50million is probably within reason.
They are broke. And Vidal isn't worth £50m+ (ridiculous suggestion). A top cm, but he isn't quite the top cm in the world. Somewhere between €40-50m or £30-40m is his true valuation.
Yes he is the top box to box midfielder in the world. Name me a better one.
I didn't say he wasn't the best box to box cm (though it's a bit of a toss up between him and Yaya imo), I said he wasn't the best cm, which he's not. I want Vidal here, but I don't want us to go crazy overboard on the price. At a certain point, he'll stop offering value for money. He's not going to score 20 goals or get 20 assists per season. He would probably be great here, but I'm getting wary of all these crazy prices I'm hearing, I don't believe them for a second.
We need a keano type player the most in this team, he is the very best option out there. I would spend crazy on him if I have the money.
When top players are being sold for £20m (Kroos) and average players are being sold for £50m (Luiz) then I think it's time to realise that the transfer market isn't always a good judge of value. Attacking players who can play multiple positions attract the biggest bids because they can generally score goals, create goals, dribble and pass at an exceptional level (Bale, Suarez, Rodriguez). If some teams want to stupidly risk their position in Europe over ridiculous bids, let them, doesn't mean we have to pay that much too. Point is, we should be able to get Vidal for far less than that, and if we can't, I'd suggest moving onto a slightly worse, but still talented cm. Strootman will almost certainly join in January anyway, providing Van Gaal wants him of course. Let's not overrate Vidal here, he's a fantastic cm, but I doubt he will win too many games for us on his own (something players like Ronaldo, Bale, Messi, Suarez are capable of) and it's also worth mentioning that players who succeed in Italy often fail to adapt to the Premier League (Veron being the most obvious and probably the best example). Getting Vidal for between £30-40m shouldn't be a problem, but if it is, it's not the end of the world. I want Vidal at Utd, but I also want us to be able to spend consistently for the next few years (something I doubt PSG will be able to keep doing if they want to remain in the Champion's League).
Pretty much nailed itKroos cost £26m because he was in the last year of his contract and would leave for free next year. Under different circumstances with a longer deal he'd have cost significantly more, in the region of £40m - £50m probably.
Slightly more £40m in cash with getting Nani off our paycheck won't be a bad deal to be honest. You have to remember that the price is often dictated not only by the selling club's financial position but also buyer's desire to buy - and in this case ours should be pretty high given our midfield issues.
One could argue that we already signed one in Herrera. Not quite as good as Keane was defensively, but neither is Vidal and he's better on the ball than Keane. Herrera's definitely box to box.
That's an odd comparison, you aren't going to get a messi, ronaldo, bale suarez player for £50mil are you? You'll have to pay north of £70mil for players of that ilk. You also use Kroos as an example, he was in his last year of his contract so £20mil would seem like a bargain without all the facts. Vidal is the best midfielder in the world bar none, £50mil seems perfectly reasonable in today's market to me.When top players are being sold for £20m (Kroos) and average players are being sold for £50m (Luiz) then I think it's time to realise that the transfer market isn't always a good judge of value. Attacking players who can play multiple positions attract the biggest bids because they can generally score goals, create goals, dribble and pass at an exceptional level (Bale, Suarez, Rodriguez). If some teams want to stupidly risk their position in Europe over ridiculous bids, let them, doesn't mean we have to pay that much too. Point is, we should be able to get Vidal for far less than that, and if we can't, I'd suggest moving onto a slightly worse, but still talented cm. Strootman will almost certainly join in January anyway, providing Van Gaal wants him of course. Let's not overrate Vidal here, he's a fantastic cm, but I doubt he will win too many games for us on his own (something players like Ronaldo, Bale, Messi, Suarez are capable of) and it's also worth mentioning that players who succeed in Italy often fail to adapt to the Premier League (Veron being the most obvious and probably the best example). Getting Vidal for between £30-40m shouldn't be a problem, but if it is, it's not the end of the world. I want Vidal at Utd, but I also want us to be able to spend consistently for the next few years (something I doubt PSG will be able to keep doing if they want to remain in the Champion's League).
You do realize that we have more than a month left in the transfer window? If it takes until the final day of the window to get Vidal than I would absolutely take that scenario. It's not like the club wouldn't be looking for alternatives in the meantime.I'm a patient man but if the deal for. Vidal can't get worked out this week it's time to move on.
Agree even that's pushing it. Nani hasn't player consistent football since 2012 most caused by persistent hamstring injuries not even Galatasaray would budge from their £7M bid.£10million for Nani? If we're lucky. Very lucky.
Vidal is worth easily £50million+ even at 27, as one of the elite central midfielders in Europe.
These ~£30million quotes are nonsense unless Juventus are completely broke or something.
I'm a patient man but if the deal for. Vidal can't get worked out this week it's time to move on.
That's an odd comparison, you aren't going to get a messi, ronaldo, bale suarez player for £50mil are you? You'll have to pay north of £70mil for players of that ilk. You also use Kroos as an example, he was in his last year of his contract so £20mil would seem like a bargain without all the facts. Vidal is the best midfielder in the world bar none, £50mil seems perfectly reasonable in today's market to me.
How many central midfielders have sold for £40m plus?
Fabregas £34m, Witsel £34m, Fernandinho £34m, Illarramendi £34m, Modric £33m, Javi Martinez £32m are the records currently. Given Vidal's contract status, the selling club's desire to hold on until they get a sizeable bid, the market boom (even this summer it's gone up another notch), and his status as one of the world's best, you'd have to argue any fee around or below £45m would be fair. Which I'm sure are all points Juve are making.
I would hope the club can find a sensible outcome.
We signed Veron for £28.1m in 2001, how much would that sum be in todays market?
Mendieta and Nedved transferred for similar fees aswell, Zidane transfered for nearly £50m in 2001 aswellPlugged it into some online inflation calculators and 37-40m seems to be what it would be worth today. Keep in mind that the normal rate of inflation is a lot slower than the inflation in wages and transfer fees in football. I think it would be safe to assume that around 50m at least is what that Veron transfer is worth now.
Finish up your holidays Vidal you lazy cnut.
The Vidal stories are continuing apace in Italy and specifically with Turin newspaper Tuttosport. It's claimed on Tuesday that Manchester United have come back in with a second offer having had their first one refused.
Tuttosport say that an original proposal which would have seen Juventus receive €40m, plus a further €3m in bonuses, was rejected immediately by Juventus chief Beppe Marotta. According to the reporting in Italy it's increasingly apparent that Juventus will sell for what they consider to be a good price.
The Turin club would have probably rather there was an auction for Vidal with clubs such as Real Madrid, Barcelona, PSG and Monaco involved but those clubs either have priorities elsewhere or have been hamstrung by FFP rules and sanctions. Right now there only appears to be Manchester United at the table for Vidal.
Tuttosport claim that Manchester United's latest offer is €43m plus bonuses, they reckon that could rise to €48m to €50m as long as targets are met within the contract. Juventus are said to want a minimum of €45m so a lot will depend on how hard those bonuses are to achieve.
Vidal's agent is pushing the situation and conducting negotiations to try and find a solution for his client. Fernando Felicevich has already got Manchester United to offer Vidal wages of €6.7m per year after tax, according to Tuttosport.
They are also said to be the most reliable Italian paper. It's still on, this!Tuttosport hmm..
They are meant to be closest to Juve.