mu4c_20le
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2013
- Messages
- 46,746
Did you get a trophy for that?Agreed. Massive mistake to sell a knobhead that dropped many clangers this season to end up with...the most clean sheets and best defence.
Did you get a trophy for that?Agreed. Massive mistake to sell a knobhead that dropped many clangers this season to end up with...the most clean sheets and best defence.
I feel like this is a big opportunity missed. I'm not saying that Arsenal won't improve, because I think they will, but you caught United and Spurs at very good times in the season and I wouldn't bank on getting those points again next time. I also expect that the teams coming up next season will be far more of a challenge compared to the dross that came up last year, in terms of quality it feels like this was a historically bad year from top to bottom.Some people just see football differently. I love this team and refuse to take it for granted because we used to come 8th and now we come 2nd. I've had very few weekends ruined by my football team's results this season, and we've also gone to Spurs and United (places we have routinely lost) and won. We've popped Liverpool in the league and even beat Man City for the first time in about three millennia. We're up there and we're going to stay up there. Hopefully we'll win a big prize but the joy of football is that you can't be certain about any of it, so just enjoy it while the going is good.
Shall we risk it because we don't have a League Cup? No obviously that's bananas. But if you see football differently, fine.
Arsenal's approach to that game told City and everybody watching "we know you're better than us, but we'll find a way to come out of here with a good result". That's the type of games I referred to Fergie using back in his day. City already feel like that but that was a critical point of the season where the game was built up as a potential changing of the guard because City were not playing well and Arsenal were firing on all cylenders. I know I was expecting Arsenal to show that that day but came away feeling "looks like everybody still treats City like the big dogs in this fight and it's more about finding away against than going for them".
Your point about City not having their fate in their hand after the game makes it worse. They were disadvanted psychologically and if Arsenal had a different more confident approach, it could have created a seed of doubt in the head of the City players. But being as much as told in very clear terms that they are the best team in the league just validated them and helped them (note I am not saying made them) go on and show that supremacy in every single game since.
Ah, another "why didn't Arsenal beat City away, are they stupid" post.
Well if you think that's annoying, wait until the "does Arteta need to win a trophy?" and the "Arteta under pressure" stories start when/if you fall 6 or 7pts behind City next season.
Problem is one team is cheating (has cheated) and the other 19 are being judged against their standards, which makes it impossible.
Normally I'd agree depending on circumstances, such as your team being ravaged by injuries and suspensions, you do what you gotta do. I felt Arsenal were more cowardly than professional if you look at the stats. Liverpool are only a shadow of themselves but looked like equals when they went to the Etihad this year, with an inferior team.Look, I wish Arsenal were open at the Etihad and got destroyed. But I can also grudgingly respect a proper professional performance from them.
Arsenal's approach to that game told City and everybody watching "we know you're better than us, but we'll find a way to come out of here with a good result". That's the type of games I referred to Fergie using back in his day. City already feel like that but that was a critical point of the season where the game was built up as a potential changing of the guard because City were not playing well and Arsenal were firing on all cylenders. I know I was expecting Arsenal to show that that day but came away feeling "looks like everybody still treats City like the big dogs in this fight and it's more about finding away against than going for them".
Your point about City not having their fate in their hand after the game makes it worse. They were disadvanted psychologically and if Arsenal had a different more confident approach, it could have created a seed of doubt in the head of the City players. But being as much as told in very clear terms that they are the best team in the league just validated them and helped them (note I am not saying made them) go on and show that supremacy in every single game since.
These are all things that are said every season. Arsenal will be up there again next season and the others you listed won't. Given the context of City, being up there challenging is all you can ask.I feel like this is a big opportunity missed. I'm not saying that Arsenal won't improve, because I think they will, but you caught United and Spurs at very good times in the season and I wouldn't bank on getting those points again next time. I also expect that the teams coming up next season will be far more of a challenge compared to the dross that came up last year, in terms of quality it feels like this was a historically bad year from top to bottom.
City weren't at their best and the likes of United, Chelsea, Newcastle and Spurs can only improve over the next season or two and surely can't be that unlucky with injuries again. Most of Arsenal's players will be on international duty this summer so squad depth will be even more important next season and we all know how City like to stockpile talent.
I feel like this is a big opportunity missed. I'm not saying that Arsenal won't improve, because I think they will, but you caught United and Spurs at very good times in the season and I wouldn't bank on getting those points again next time. I also expect that the teams coming up next season will be far more of a challenge compared to the dross that came up last year, in terms of quality it feels like this was a historically bad year from top to bottom.
City weren't at their best and the likes of United, Chelsea, Newcastle and Spurs can only improve over the next season or two and surely can't be that unlucky with injuries again. Most of Arsenal's players will be on international duty this summer so squad depth will be even more important next season and we all know how City like to stockpile talent.
I feel like this is a big opportunity missed. I'm not saying that Arsenal won't improve, because I think they will, but you caught United and Spurs at very good times in the season and I wouldn't bank on getting those points again next time. I also expect that the teams coming up next season will be far more of a challenge compared to the dross that came up last year, in terms of quality it feels like this was a historically bad year from top to bottom.
City weren't at their best and the likes of United, Chelsea, Newcastle and Spurs can only improve over the next season or two and surely can't be that unlucky with injuries again. Most of Arsenal's players will be on international duty this summer so squad depth will be even more important next season and we all know how City like to stockpile talent.
I'd have thought it was evident with my posts that I'm talking about maintaining your position as challengers and adding other trophies like the domestic cups or a European title if you don't win the league. I find it hard to believe that Arsenal fans or the board will accept 2nd year after year if you win nothing else in the meantime. You'll think, wait a minute, we can bring someone in now that could get us over that line.
Yeah we were laughing when they got a bunch of our starters. It was hilarious.Feck them.
I still remember my friend who gloated me on that time.
How dou you like pie now. And they are probably pissed on city, but they laughed when they fecked us and Liverpool.
Feck you posh london cnuts.
I think context is also important because Arsenal went into that game full of confidence, above City and were smashing teams for fun. City, on the other hand, weren't altogether that convincing at that point. An Arsenal win might have not changed anything in the grand scheme of things but I think it could have done psychological damage to City.Normally I'd agree depending on circumstances, such as your team being ravaged by injuries and suspensions, you do what you gotta do. I felt Arsenal were more cowardly than professional if you look at the stats. Liverpool are only a shadow of themselves but looked like equals when they went to the Etihad this year, with an inferior team.
Yes, we did and it's beautifulDid you get a trophy for that?
I think context is also important because Arsenal went into that game full of confidence, above City and were smashing teams for fun. City, on the other hand, weren't altogether that convincing at that point. An Arsenal win might have not changed anything in the grand scheme of things but I think it could have done psychological damage to City.
Dropped too many points in the 2023 portion of the season. When you challenge this City side you know you're gonna need 90+ points to win the league. Arsenal dropped 20 points in the first 20 games. Left themselves with a margin for error of no more than 3 points, with a trip to Manchester still to go in 2024
Must have been a very quiet one, since I don't really see anyone bar Timber missing from either the starting XI or the bench when it comes to the strongest ~15 players in the squad (if whatever I googled are the correct lineups). Could of course have been lots of players playing with minor injuries but I think that's been more or less the case for pretty much all teams in this incredibly injury-ridden season, but having only one potential starter completely out in perhaps the biggest game of the season is a luxury very few teams have been granted this season - if any.Not true at all.
We went into that match in a quiet injury crisis not having smashed anybody since four weeks previously and with our last two games being a desperate last minute winner at home against a Brentford side in free fall and then massively struggling to beat Porto 1-0 over 120 minutes at home and needing penalties to get through the tie.
People are looking at our flying February form but we played City March 31 and a lot changed for the club for the worse over that month.
Yes, this is correct. Although we got back into it in the second half, we left ourselves too much to do.Yeah, Arteta was still experimenting. Remember he started the first few games of the season with Partey at RB, the Havertz in midfield experiment went for a while longer. It cost them in the end. Taking 0/6 points vs Villa and 1/6 vs Fulham was a problem
Must have been a very quiet one, since I don't really see anyone bar Timber missing from either the starting XI or the bench when it comes to the strongest ~15 players in the squad (if whatever I googled are the correct lineups). Could of course have been lots of players playing with minor injuries but I think that's been more or less the case for pretty much all teams in this incredibly injury-ridden season, but having only one potential starter completely out in perhaps the biggest game of the season is a luxury very few teams have been granted this season - if any.
Normally I'd agree depending on circumstances, such as your team being ravaged by injuries and suspensions, you do what you gotta do. I felt Arsenal were more cowardly than professional if you look at the stats. Liverpool are only a shadow of themselves but looked like equals when they went to the Etihad this year, with an inferior team.
I actually don't get what Rodri is saying. Arsenal played for a draw, so it gave them a big psychological boost and that's what won it? I can't remember the stat but it's something like they've won something ridiculous like 60+ games out of 70+ games from February onwards I had heard over the years. They were already unbeaten from December to end of that game at end of March. They are unbeaten at home since December 2022. But they needed that confidence booster of drawing with Arsenal to get them.over the line?
Maybe we should have opened up and let them beat us 4-1 then, that could have really dented their confidence then.
Regardless of whether it actually makes sense or not, the mentality might be something akin to "for a new challenger without championship bona fides, if you want to be champion/king, you have to take the crown". There is no better way of proving that mettle than taking the game to the champions on their home turf. By not doing that, Arsenal showed that they were not ready to be Champions and City could sense that as well, giving them a boost. Once you have championship credentials, then you could call such moves shrewd, savvy, or pragmatic, but before then it's just cowardly.
There. I tried.
I just find it funny that when Arsenal do it it's cowardly. When Mourinho does it it used to be a masterclass. And when Arsenal used to open up and get shat on away at the big teams we were called naive and stupid. It's hard to keep on top of what your 'meant to do.'
See for me, the bottom line is that City are still a stronger team, especially at home. They have the best manager, they have the best defensive midfielder, they had the best attacking midfielder of the past 5 years, they have the player of the year as another attacking midfielder, they have the best striker in the world up front.
I've seen better teams than this current Arsenal team try to take on City at The Emirates and fail. Even Real Madrid learnt their lesson between last season and this season.
I mean...Rodri is one of those guys in the mold of other Pep players that complains about the "negative" approach other teams take to a game when it doesn't go his team's way.
I think the stuff you're talking about is just a minor annoyance until Arsenal get over the finish line on the league win, at which point it becomes harder to question the approach. Mourinho won pretty much from the outset, so his tactics can be a masterclass.
Agreed, not sure why net spend is used, just means a club is better at selling than another, doesn't represent what jhas been spent.Why you judging it on Net Spend? I can look at that and put up an argument that Michael Edwards managed pull Barca's pants down for Coutinho, managed to do the same to other clubs for a few of the guys like Rhian Brewster, and then they lucked out when Saudi managed to take a washed up Fabinho and Henderson off their hands.
How much did the respective squads actually cost, both in terms of fees and wages, is a much fairer way to look at it.
Net spend is complete BS, successful clubs don't buy players based on how much they might recoup when they sell them, indeed they'll be delighted if they get little back, because if that is the case then the chances are they bought the right playerAgreed, not sure why net spend is used, just means a club is better at selling than another, doesn't represent what jhas been spent.
Hey man, this is very much a relevant bump, so I'm not mad at it.https://www.eurosport.com/football/...ainst-manchester-city_sto20005988/story.shtml
Sorry to bump this again but just read this today and reminded me of our conversation.
City didn't show their supremacy in every game since. They only took maximum points against Forest and Spurs because Woods and Son didn't have their shooting boots on. Woods especially missed not one, but two, chances from mere yards out.Arsenal's approach to that game told City and everybody watching "we know you're better than us, but we'll find a way to come out of here with a good result". That's the type of games I referred to Fergie using back in his day. City already feel like that but that was a critical point of the season where the game was built up as a potential changing of the guard because City were not playing well and Arsenal were firing on all cylenders. I know I was expecting Arsenal to show that that day but came away feeling "looks like everybody still treats City like the big dogs in this fight and it's more about finding away against than going for them".
Your point about City not having their fate in their hand after the game makes it worse. They were disadvanted psychologically and if Arsenal had a different more confident approach, it could have created a seed of doubt in the head of the City players. But being as much as told in very clear terms that they are the best team in the league just validated them and helped them (note I am not saying made them) go on and show that supremacy in every single game since.
Yeah, it's absolute nonsense saying they bottled it. To bottle' a league is when you're in a secure position but lose a lot of points in the run in and not just a single game: it's what Newcastle did in 96, what we did in 2012, and maybe you could argue last year with Arsenal, but they've been absolutely brilliant this year, same with Liverpool that season they got 90 something points and finished second place (think it was a single draw against Spurs that cost them?).Need to stop with this "bottled the league " crap. They did not bottle it. In fact credit to them for not crumbling after losing against Villa. Fought till the end and lost out to a top city side.
They need to go again and hope things fall in their favor again from injuries pov next season. They have a good squad and some changes here and there and they can do it.
if City drew with West Ham, would they be bottling it?Yeah, it's absolute nonsense saying they bottled it. To bottle' a league is when you're in a secure position but lose a lot of points in the run in and not just a single game: it's what Newcastle did in 96, what we did in 2012, and maybe you could argue last year with Arsenal, but they've been absolutely brilliant this year, same with Liverpool that season they got 90 something points and finished second place (think it was a single draw against Spurs that cost them?).
Sad fact for them is that they worked extremely hard, have done an incredible rebuild but have come up against a financially doped team with a great manager. Sucks to be them and for the rest of the league I guess, but it is what it is.