RedPnutz
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2009
- Messages
- 1,512
I wonder why is that not a good thing.Great finisher and for sure his record is very good indeed. But the hard work I don't see. He is almost a pure attacking outlet.
I wonder why is that not a good thing.Great finisher and for sure his record is very good indeed. But the hard work I don't see. He is almost a pure attacking outlet.
Maybe you've just caught him on a bad day, but he presses and closes down quite regularly. OK he's not at Suarez/Mandzukic levels but he is definitely a hard working striker.Great finisher and for sure his record is very good indeed. But the hard work I don't see. He is almost a pure attacking outlet.
Sorry, but that's rubbish.
And Griezmann easily had a better year than Suarez. CL final and Euro final, the best player of the team in both cases. Carries the attack without having Messi or Neymar feeding him goals.
Carrick(this is with the current team)
Herrera - Pogba
Mkhitaryan
Ibra - Griezmann
He's spent his break so far making the rounds in the NBA. Not sure if it's an Atleti or France Football initiative, maybe even his own marketing team thought about it. If he wants to fully break into the US market, United is the way to go
I'd say Suarez > Messi > CR7 > G7
As he is not a number 9 where would we play him? Pogba plays best in a 4-3-3, so where would Griezmann fit into that? We have Martial on the left and Mikitaryian on the right. Where would he play? The Euro's showed Pogba cannot effectively play in the same team as him.
Nah not really. If we're using a 4-3-3 he doesn't really fit in at any of those positions. He's world class, but in his right position. Otherwise he won't have a huge impact. Will still pop up with goals but you won't see him at his best unless he is the second striker.This lad could play anywhere in attack. If we are lucky enough to get him that is.
Nah not really. If we're using a 4-3-3 he doesn't really fit in at any of those positions. He's world class, but in his right position. Otherwise he won't have a huge impact. Will still pop up with goals but you won't see him at his best unless he is the second striker.
Nah not really. If we're using a 4-3-3 he doesn't really fit in at any of those positions. He's world class, but in his right position. Otherwise he won't have a huge impact. Will still pop up with goals but you won't see him at his best unless he is the second striker.
Yep, this is basically the only way. Put Martial in for Ibra to rotate in for him and eventually when Ibra is done here. Obviously what I would hope we do if/when we sign him. Though saying that, we aren't exactly rigid in our lineups. For easy games we can easily get away with a 4-2-3-1, with Griezmann as the 10, ibra top, Herrera and Pogba in a midfield 2, mkhitaryan and martial on the wings. Harder games we need Carrick in the midfield for a 3, and that's where Griezmann will probably need to be shifted a bit to get it all to work. But that'd be fine still.
This could work. It's similar to how we would end up normally if Mkhitaryan and Martial started on the wings, with Mkhi drifting inside.
Quite a few occasions for Atletico.I there any evidence Griezmann is not good as a CF? I saw in the Euros how he was ineffective playing out wide but when has he played as the main striker?
You make me sad.Quite a few occasions for Atletico.
I haven't said he did not play well there. The sample size is too small to make a judgement. personally, I see no reason he can't play centrally in a fluid front three.You make me sad.
There's a good chance we are after him. Just need to clear some cash off the weekly wage bill. Schweinsteiger, Depay, Schneiderlin, Fellaini and Young are eating up about £580k/wk at the moment and we can't continue to just buy expensive players whilst eating all that cash for players we aren't using. Once that's off the books, I expect us to go after a top midfielder and attacker.
But once all of them are sold we would have 4 midfielders (including a new one) for a midfield 3.
Do you think Strootman will still be able to do a job for us consistently given his injury record?I hope we look at Strootman as a Carrick replacement and build around the starting 3 with Perreira and TFM. Keeping but not playing Schweini doesn't seem to be in the cards given his massive wages.
I hope we look at Strootman as a Carrick replacement and build around the starting 3 with Perreira and TFM. Keeping but not playing Schweini doesn't seem to be in the cards given his massive wages.
This could work. It's similar to how we would end up normally if Mkhitaryan and Martial started on the wings, with Mkhi drifting inside.
The midfield control we have been enjoying will be gone once Pogba is pushed further back and we haven't got a proper holder, we paid £89M for a unique player, a #8/#10 hybrid, I can't see the point in not building the team around him and to his strengths, which is having the freedom to drift between the two roles in midfield, not stuck in a double pivot with a #10/SS in his attacking zones.
This. Pogba is an absolute monster and from all accounts getting back to Manchester and playing a major role in the club's success was a goal of his. I can't fathom people wanting to shove him back into a place that weakens both his potential and very likely our team's. There is not another player in the world right now that matches Pogba's qualities, and it couldn't be more obvious that all of his qualities come out in a midfield 3.
Yep, it would still be a waste of Pogba though, he is a very unique #8/#10 hybrid and the proper 3 man midfield allows him to excel, we paid £89M for hi and should build around that accordingly. If Griezmann can mesh his Real Sociedad qualities with his Atletico ones then maybe he'd work in one of the WF roles, we shall see.
^^
Unless Griezmann is shoved right up front and completely out of Pogba's area of the pitch, both players would be compromised and have diminishing returns in the same team. Pogba needs licence to roam and do his thing and so does Griezmann. Unless they developed perfect synergy, there would be a horrible realisation that one £89m player cannot play with the other £80m+ player without severely restricting their own game.
Pogba's uniqueness is actually part of the problem when it comes to Griezmann's nominal role, which is ironic in itself, but it should be evident that we build the team to cater to Pogba and his unique playing style and attributes especially so given he's not close to being the player he could be and as such should be given no hindrances to the long-term goal of extracting all his potential and expression out onto the pitch.
Bringing Griezmann in and then expecting him to conform to a role that didn't bring him his current status is grossly unfair on him, I think. To have to be a 'workaround' in a new team in a new league whilst being expected to deliver at a level befitting of one of the highest transfer fees of all time... what could possibly go wrong...?
I like the player, but if we're looking at Atletico, Saúl, Carrasco or Koké are all probably better fits here than Griezmann, unfortunately.
Sorry, not having a go at you specifically, but this formulaic 'get used to each other and combine well' approach (quite prevalent in this thread, too) is a highly effective way of neutering your 2 record signings (who should ideally be operating at an optimal level), and how you create potential situations like Galacticos I, or Verón + Scholes - though Griezmann is more of a forward than that duo.I disagree fully I think we can and hopefully will play both in the same team. They will get used to each other and combine well and either one won't have a negative effect on hampering each other's performances. I think it's over cooked this theory. Both then will combine and work well given the time.
Players either have that intuitive synergy, or they don't, and when they don't, you can spend years wasting time until the conclusion comes back to what we already knew. I'm not saying it definitively, but all evidence up to this point, is that these two don't work superfluously together.I disagree fully I think we can and hopefully will play both in the same team. They will get used to each other and combine well and either one won't have a negative effect on hampering each other's performances. I think it's over cooked this theory. Both then will combine and work well given the time.
there's no harm in believing you are the coach that can make something work that others cannot, but it's not the best approach to the market to have a renowned connundrum on your hands before the two even get out on the pitch. It would make Jose a marvel to use both optimally when all indicators thus far say that it's not possible.If Jose signs Antoine then he has a plan for him and how he can fit into our side, it's that simple.
Look at Neymar. His best position isn't out wide on the left but Neymar being there has helped make Barca one of the greatest sides of all time.
Pogba's influence may well not be at 100% but overall the side would be better for it. Evening out the resposnibility is a good thing surely? That's only if Jose hasn't got a plan of how to fit everyong in seamlessly.
Personally I would love to see Pogba play off a worldclass number 10, some of that interplay would be ridiculous.
Sorry, not having a go at you specifically, but this formulaic 'get used to each other and combine well' approach (quite prevalent in this thread, too) is a highly effective way of neutering your 2 record signings (who should ideally be operating at an optimal level), and how you create potential situations like Galacticos I, or Verón + Scholes - though Griezmann is more of a forward than that duo.
Griezmann is blatantly better through the middle than out wide - playing off the shoulder of the lead striker, and when he's used as the pseudo #10, he encroaches upon Pogba's zone of influence - there is ample evidence of that when they play together for France (who have to make weird arrangements like playing Pogba in a 2 when he's way more effective in a 3, and using Sissoko as a faux wide midfielder just to accommodate Pogba + Griezmann), and no amount of chemistry can make up for that functional overlap. You could go the diamond route, but it's not without its flaws in the Premier League - particularly given the emphasis placed on top echelon wingbacks in that particular scheme.
I get that Pogba likes to drift left and plays at his best on the left of a midfield 3 and that Griezmann has played his best football as a second striker but to say that a central midfield player and a forward cannot be accommodated in the same side is ludicrous.
United have played formations with 4 players in more offensive roles than Pogba this season. Often playing fantastic stuff with Mata as a number 10 ahead of him. If a top class coach cannot find a system to fit Pogba and Griezmann in then it's a major indictment of his coaching skills.
Formations don't have to be symmetric, especially with a full back like Valencia. Griezmann could nominally play right side and still operate effectively as a second striker.
For France, I think Matuidi is more the issue than Pogba/Griezmann. Playing a more disciplined player next to Pogba would balance the team far better.
Seems more like you see a brilliant player that is probably open to a move here, and you want him, logic be damned. Just ignoring the evidence up to this point in time (France) and saying things will be different... just because... isn't very objective or reasoned, is it?Yep I totally agree plus I have heard the Gerrard/Lampard and also the Scholes/Veron debate being put in but Pogba and Griezman don't play in the same position. I get that they occupy the same areas but this could easily be ironed out.
I would love Griezman at OT and he would be another blue chip match winner (the more the better) plus with his will to win, work rate and desire. I think it is ano brainer if he is available to us.
I don't care if United play 4 players with more offensive roles than Pogba, or 5, or 6, or play him at centerback. Pogba is at his best when he's given the freedom to roam and improvise - he thrives on that, and that sense of tactical freedom is why he emerged as an elite player at Juventus - where Vidal/Khedira and Pirlo/Marchisio provided the platform for Pogba to excel as a dynamo, and the same is true at United where he's evidenced an upturn in form and offensive contributions with the backing of Carrick and Herrera. Whereas Griezmann hit his Atlético peak with deep central midfielders (iterations of Gabi, Tiago, Saúl) - who sacrificed a lot in their games, pressed and harried and with a tucked in Koke, laid the groundwork for him to pick his spots behind the lead striker - that just doesn't work well with a roamer in Pogba.I get that Pogba likes to drift left and plays at his best on the left of a midfield 3 and that Griezmann has played his best football as a second striker but to say that a central midfield player and a forward cannot be accommodated in the same side is ludicrous.
United have played formations with 4 players in more offensive roles than Pogba this season. Often playing fantastic stuff with Mata as a number 10 ahead of him. If a top class coach cannot find a system to fit Pogba and Griezmann in then it's a major indictment of his coaching skills.
Formations don't have to be symmetric, especially with a full back like Valencia. Griezmann could nominally play right side and still operate effectively as a second striker.
For France, I think Matuidi is more the issue than Pogba/Griezmann. Playing a more disciplined player next to Pogba would balance the team far better.