Raees
Pythagoras in Boots
- Joined
- May 16, 2009
- Messages
- 29,553
I tend to agree with you, but what do you really mean by 'technically'? 'Cos I get the feeling most people just mean "dribbling", you know?... I think it's potentially fair to say Rashford has so far demonstrated the greater aptitude for a broader set of skills. Crossing, shooting, dead ball prowess, decision making etc - all more evident in Rashford so far, but Martial's ability to dribble in close quarters (when it comes off) seems to instantly propel him into a higher technical category by default. I don't necessarily disagree with it either, I just find it mildly interesting. What makes one 'technical' and the other not?
Rashford has great range in terms of technical attributes as he can do many things but in terms of consistency of application he's incredibly erratic.. I.e. His first touch, accuracy of dribbling are very wayward to the point where he veers between a championship player and a world class player in terms of the overall technical quality he shows in his performances.
Like apart from he's two goals in the first game he's been utterly dogshit during pre season but no one will call him out on it due to his protected status as a golden boy whereas if Martial had shown similar technical deficiencies such as constantly losing control of the ball he'd be lambasted.
Not saying that Martial will definitely end up the better player because Rashford has a superior mentality but if we were basing it here and now on who is the more technical footballer it would be Martial because he can carry out the fundamentals more consistently and is capable of doing it at a higher level against any level of player , I.e. Strong first touch, ball sticks close to his foot, doesn't run it out of play. Rashford is technically a better striker of the ball I'd say but a confident Martial is a damn good finisher it's just he's lost his belief in this regard.
For me technically better is about consistency and ability to pull it off at a higher level - if you're capable of doing many things but 9 times out of 10 you're unable to pull them off or it goes to pieces against a top team or someone having a good game against you versus a guy who has maybe less in his locker but does it well consistently I'd say the latter is more technically gifted. I.e Scholes versus Gerrard.. in terms of range of what they can do, I'd say it's tight but Gerrard probably has more in his locker but Scholes fundamentals were so damn good and consistent that is why he's talked about so highly and even technicians like Xavi and Zidane spoke so highly of him.
Martial at his best looks like a elite footballer in the making but of course he still has many flaws in terms of decision making and predictability issues whereas Rashford is more unpredictable which is a good thing but blinkers aside he can look really poor technically to the point where he can't even control a ball.
In an ideal world you'd have combination of Martials talent and Rashfords brain but it is interesting to see which one will go on to be the better footballer. For me Jose is very biased towards Rashford but under a more objective manager it would probably be Martial who the team is built around.