I find it hilarious how some praise his performances now, yet can't see that he is performing much better now than when he was given a chance for us. The difference is very obvious, if he was putting these performances when he played for us then he would have got more chances.
There is no conspiracy or agenda, we were desperate for someone creative as a 10, and Bruno is showing the level that was needed for us. The fact that he could not displace the likes of Lingard and Periera is more damning on his performances for us, and how average his performances was back then.
He is a talent, and we always rated him highly, but to say that he deserved more chances based on those performances back then is ridiculous. He was not ready for us, and needed a loan, like a few of the other players in that bracket like Chong, Garner, Levitt who had outgrown the academy level but were not really ready to step up for us immediately.
Hope he does well and fulfills his potential, and we may get him back someday. He is just starting, so good luck to him.