Rado_N
Yaaas Broncos!
I couldn't give a flying feck how much he costs. He's a great player and will improve the team dramatically, that's all that matters.
Angel Di Maria could now cost Manchester United £75m after Real Madrid raise their asking price for midfielder
- Louis van Gaal looked set to capture Di Maria for £60m
- But Real Madrid have now increased their asking price for the midfielder
Jesus, I'm not bitter at all. It's just amazing that these 'lol, he snubbed Madrid to play for us' fantasies didn't take a bit more time to pop up.
I'm sad to see him go but I said this yesterday, I hope he does well for you guys.
That's what I meant, if it's done in time.Little matter of work permit?
Everybody will be competing for Reus, it will be very hard to pull off. Di Maria is quality, brilliant addition to the team.75 million? Is that for real? If it is...
As much as I want this guy but it seems our money is getting raped. We should just wait next season and sign Reus. Centre midfield is still the priority one at the moment.
The Madrid fans I've talked to agree. They were happy to get rid of party boy to Arsenal, but thought there was no way the club would be stupid enough to sell Di Maria. I certainly don't see the logic on their side if they have no money worries.Great signing for us but stupid on Madrid's part to let him go. He was immense for them last season and that combination of industry, work rate, pace and penetration was vital. In their current squad he deserves to start ahead of James.
75 million? Is that for real? If it is...
As much as I want this guy but it seems our money is getting raped. We should just wait next season and sign Reus. Centre midfield is still the priority one at the moment.
I don't know about you lot, but he is WAY overpriced. Among many reasons why he is not worth it is because He is not a match winner like Suarez/Ronaldo, if you are going to pay over the top-do it for the right player. Ma any club would pay is £56 including add-ons.
I might be in a minority here, but if Di Maria does not play well-it will bite us the back big time.
I agree with the second paragraph but saying the guy with the most assists in the top 5 leagues (and the most in the Champions League) isn't a match winner is pretty ridiculous.I don't know about you lot, but he is WAY overpriced. Among many reasons why he is not worth it is because He is not a match winner like Suarez/Ronaldo, if you are going to pay over the top-do it for the right player. Ma any club would pay is £56 including add-ons.
I might be in a minority here, but if Di Maria does not play well-it will bite us the back big time.
Of course he is. Probably sat there crying like a bitch. Boo hoo.is Vato butthurt?
You don't know that.
I'll surviveWell considering you associate yourself with probably the 2 biggest clubs in the history of football I think you will be alright eh petal?
2004 is calling mateAt 64 million we are overpaying by a 20 million still for me.
Don't care that much as long as money is left for a top midfielder but i think that might not be the case now.
True but the money could be added to other targets that would help strengthen other weaknesses in the squad, so I think it's justifiable to be annoyed with the money spent.
Certainly. Ones a big game player, the other is a bottler.He is worth triple Ozil easily
You get a top top player, world class, yet people still moan! First they want to organize a protest cause we're not signing players, now we overpay. You just can't win, can you?WHO GIVES A feck.
WE HAVE THE MONEY. WE ARE SPENDING IT. END OF
Better than spending 60m on a few Ashley Young types. He's a fecking beast of a player
You will give a feck when you realise that how much we (over) spend will have a direct affect on our budget for next summer. That sort of fee should buy you a Suarez, sorry Di Maria isn't a match winner on that level but hey this is woodward negotiating a transfer, so it's to be expected that he'll over pay by quite some margin.WHO GIVES A feck.
WE HAVE THE MONEY. WE ARE SPENDING IT. END OF
But, he won't get as much assists here with the amount of quality in the premier league. Also, he lacks goals scored (4 goals)-which really low.I agree with the second paragraph but saying the guy with the most assists in the top 5 leagues (and the most in the Champions League) isn't a match winner is pretty ridiculous.
Bolt could finally be useful to United
Chances are, the people complaining about the fee don't think he's "top top player, world class", it's called a difference in opinion.You get a top top player, world class, yet people still moan! First they want to organize a protest cause we're not signing players, now we overpay. You just can't win, can you?
I don't care how much we pay - we have the money, he improves us to no end, so what is there not to like?
I couldn't give a flying feck how much he costs. He's a great player and will improve the team dramatically, that's all that matters.
It really won't with the income of Adidas + Chevrolet deal and if we make champions league. We have never spent this much in a single transfer window, heck we spent fecking 15m after we sold Ronaldo.You will give a feck when you realise that how much we (over) spend will have a direct affect on our budget for next summer. That sort of fee should buy you a Suarez, sorry Di Maria isn't a match winner on that level but hey this is woodward negotiating a transfer, so it's to be expected that he'll over pay by quite some margin.
You do know that our projected revenue for this season is upwards of £400m right? Chevrolet deal kicks in, Adidas deal kicks in next season. This club is a printing press of money.You will give a feck when you realise that how much we (over) spend will have a direct affect on our budget for next summer. That sort of fee should buy you a Suarez, sorry Di Maria isn't a match winner on that level but hey this is woodward negotiating a transfer, so it's to be expected that he'll over pay by quite some margin.
Rather the Glazers money is spent on players and not filling their pocketsWHO GIVES A feck.
WE HAVE THE MONEY. WE ARE SPENDING IT. END OF
Better than spending 60m on a few Ashley Young types. He's a fecking beast of a player
You've got to love the Caf sometimes, while the price is very high people on here have been bitching all summer about how Chelsea/Madrid just waltz in, slam big money on the table, and get their man, while Woody et al dither around over a few million. We're about to break the British transfer record for a world-class player about to enter his prime, and suddenly it's a problem.
2004 is calling mate
You're not paying £64M for Di Maria? That's at least double what he's worth (or more like three times based on is wing performances).
75m euro+.. If that includes winnign the league and champions league etc then I'd galdly see us pay those add-ons!Sky Sports said the fee could rise to £56m when I was watching about a hour ago.