Ander Herrera is a Manchester United Player!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Given that we've such a long-standing interest and were, apparently, willing to pay the release clause, I really really hope we're planning on putting the time in to get this done before January. If it was just a matter of us being naive about the length of time required, I'd hope there's still a chance...
 
Lowe says Herrera will get the worst of it and compares his case to Llorente's. Blames United. Says we underestimated how complex the deal would be and rocked up thinking we could do it at the last minute. Says the feeling from Spain is that Man Utd made a real mess of this.


It's not only Spain that thinks Man Utd made a real mess of it. Everyone from everywhere thinks the same.
 
After calming down a bit I admit that I may have overreacted. Taking example from the Martinez deal, it took Bayern weeks to finally wrap it up. It could be that it was naive on our part to think it could be done quicker. As why we leave it so late, perhaps the player hi self only made himself available so late. Remember we did ask Bilbao a few times about him in the past, but only now we know that the player is willing to move. Also you have to factor Herrera quickness to push this deal. Could it be that he wanted the move before we made our move, but he infor he agent too late.

In the end, this could be easily about United just doesnt have enough time to go through the terms of the deal and decided to pull the plug. If this is what happened then our relatioship with the player should be fine. And it may give us a chance to ressurect this deal in January.
 
Interesting, we might not be the ones at fault after all:
“What a mess”. Those were the words quickly doing the rounds on Twitter last night when news trickled through that the deal for Ander Herrera was called off. Newly appointed Manchester United CEO Edward Woodward was blamed thousands of times for multiple things, but one word came up more than once: “incompetent”. It's hard not to agree with the accusations, but a question everyone wants answered is “what actually happened?”.

First of all, it's worth nothing that the “three wise men” spotted walking in and out of the LFP (Liga de Fútbol Profesional) headquarters were not impostors, but a group of Bilbao lawyers who had dealt with Athletic Bilbao (especially in the Javi Martinez transfer) before.

Other than talks of the deal breaking down over the release clause, it appears there was an obstacle that even Bayern Munich struggled to overcome when they attempted to sign Javi Martinez.

Lartaun de Arizmendi, a journalist for Cadena COPE (the radio station who first broke the news that Manchester United were interested in Ander Herrera), has revealed in a post on his personal blog that, irregardless of the reported clause, the Herrera deal was near impossible to complete and that Bayern Munich needed external help to force through the Javi Martinez transfer.

He says that after much reflection on the Javi Martinez case, Athletic Bilbao came to realise that the player depositing the cheque on Bayern Munich's behalf (even if Athletic were against the move) wasn't enough to make the deal 100% go through. Once they had discovered this detail, Athletic used it to their advantage and told Bayern Munich that for a unilateral deal like this one to go through, the club has to agree to receive the fee in their bank account.

If Bilbao refuse to receive the money, and there was no obligation for them to do so, the will of the paying club (Bayern Munich) and the player (Javi Martinez) counted for nothing. In order to force the deal to go through, Munich contacted the Financial Council in Bilbao to tell them that this offer was being refused. The Financial Council, who would benefit from this deal going through, pressured Athletic Bilbao in accepting the money by telling them that if they did not do so, they would be required to immediately pay all the debts they owed the Financial Council and would not receive anymore help from them in the future.
It is only after this happened that Athletic Bilbao accepted the offer for Javi Martinez and have the money placed in their bank account.

Returning to the Herrera deal, it appears that there was never any panic on Athletic Bilbao's side and it was reported many times that they were confident the deal would not go through. If what Lartaun de Arizmendi has written is true, Bilbao knew that Manchester United would never have the time to get the Financial Council on their side in time for a similar process to happen.
If Bilbao refused to accept the money in their bank account, this would explain why the three Laffer lawyers were turned away at the LFP headquarters yesterday evening.

Edward Woodward (or whoever was in charge of the deal) was not aware of the loophole exploited by Bayern Munich and why would they be? Athletic Bilbao will have clearly done their best to keep it a secret in order to hold on to their best players.

As we all know, Juventus had to wait an extra year to get Fernando Llorente on a free because they hit a stumbling block similar to the one Manchester United crashed into late last night. Again, if what Lartaun writes is correct (and logically, it seems to be), Juventus would not have known of the Javi Martinez loophole and Bilbao stubbornly refused to accept the money.

Lartaun writes at the bottom of his post: “This is what I have managed to find on the Ander Herrera/MUFC deal. Now, it is up to you to draw your own conclusions as appropriate”.

We will, Lartaun, we will. If what you say is true, perhaps Manchester United are not the only ones to blame for this deal falling through.
 
I think it could still be done. Need to convince Herrera that theres little we could do given the nature of the deal. Will be difficult but it could be done
 
Get this wrapped up in January with Conetroa (however you spell it). Please get it done early too.. Bunch of useless cnuts.
 
I haven't been following this detail but any chance we're getting an official statement from one of the parties involved - United, Bilbao or the player himself? There doesn't seem to be much if any clarity on what went wrong.
 
Well I can't be sure but it looks to me that we were at the very limit of what we were willing to pay when more liabilities were exposed, and we pulled out. Wisely, by the look of it.

I totally accept the argument that we should never have been trying to pull this off so late in the window. Poor planning.

In fairness man, United would most likely have been advised by those sports lawmen & they probably told they could swing the deal before the deadline.

Those lads would have been on the clock with massive reddies rollin in aswell - win-win for them regardless & their mugs in the media, albeit as some band of fraudsters. The feckin irony - lawyers being accused of being dodgy shocker!

The underlining factor here, is United's transfer strategy for this window was sunday league shizzle - absolutely diabolical in every way. There was plenty of time to draft a list potential targets & weigh up the possibilities of success. Instead, we seemed to have spent about 3 weeks will-we or wont-we with Thiago & then when that was put to bed - we jumped on the Cesc to United quest, wastin probably another 3 weeks or more aswell & with little or no activity elsewhere - that's how it looks after yesterday shambles.

I always thought of our team as being some kind of super-efficient machine, leavin no stone left unturned etc. There couldnt have been that much of a dismantling on Gills admin/transfer team could there? It was supposed to have been a smooth transfer of duties from Gill to Ed, so that would include the retention of corporate memory for transfers etc.

Anyway, I feel sorry for that poor Ander lad. They're quite patriotic around those parts & he's gonna be getting the Judas taunts most likely. I think the owners of Athletic need a bitta scrutiny as to whats negative about bringing in €30m+ from a young man's transfer to one of the most famous clubs in the world. Ander's people should be proud of him that he's flyin the flag for all of them & their culture, on such a world stage!
 
I haven't been following this detail but any chance we're getting an official statement from one of the parties involved - United, Bilbao or the player himself? There doesn't seem to be much if any clarity on what went wrong.


The player himself is speaking tomorrow if his mate is to be believe.
 
So basically a release clause counts for nothing?

Sounds like United haven't had enough time to fully understand the workings of the contract loophole. jojojo mentioned this earlier in a discussion and probably hit the nail on the head:
The biggest issue for the club in using a release clause is that they will have to ask sports and tax lawyers to confirm the exact ruling and the wording of the contracts, and they'll want an indemnity in case of legal/tax office challenge.

It took Munich about a month to get the formal statements in place. We're on the Friday before a Monday deadline
 
Sounds like United haven't had enough time to fully understand the workings of the contract loophole. jojojo mentioned this earlier in a discussion and probably hit the nail on the head:

Then we should get started on this now if we want to have the deal confirmed early in the January window.
 
Why are Bilbao so stubborn? I understand the fact that money itself is not that big a draw given the small talent pool available to them but I would have thought their actions could make young Basque players think twice before joining them in the future
 
Interesting, we might not be the ones at fault after all:
thanks for the article.
If Bilbao refuse to receive the money, and there was no obligation for them to do so, the will of the paying club (Bayern Munich) and the player (Javi Martinez) counted for nothing. In order to force the deal to go through, Munich contacted the Financial Council in Bilbao to tell them that this offer was being refused. The Financial Council, who would benefit from this deal going through, pressured Athletic Bilbao in accepting the money by telling them that if they did not do so, they would be required to immediately pay all the debts they owed the Financial Council and would not receive anymore help from them in the future.
It is only after this happened that Athletic Bilbao accepted the offer for Javi Martinez and have the money placed in their bank account.

That part sounds truely badass, but isn't that illegal, well probably not if the financial council is doing the blackmailing. There were a lot of rumours last summer during the Martinez deal that in theory those release clauses can only be triggered from Spanish clubs but don't count for international transfer dealings and none of the Bayern representatives ever said what actually happened to make it work in the end, so it really makes sense that we pulled something crazy like that to get Martinez.
 
Imagine being sought after by Manchester United on three different occasions. The last one almost ending in a transfer.

I really hope our interest doesn't stop with last night's debacle.
 
Then we should get started on this now if we want to have the deal confirmed early in the January window.
The brass should be working on this as of 8-9am this morning.
Why are Bilbao so stubborn? I understand the fact that money itself is not that big a draw given the small talent pool available to them but I would have thought their actions could make young Basque players think twice before joining them in the future
It's funny, as they actually do need money for their stadium, wasn't a part of the planned deals that we'd play a friendly with them to drum up more cash?
 
If the loophole in the tax were established and understood for the Martinez deal and we used the exact same people, why did the deal fall through?
 
Why are Bilbao so stubborn? I understand the fact that money itself is not that big a draw given the small talent pool available to them but I would have thought their actions could make young Basque players think twice before joining them in the future

I suppose for some but for others Bilbao's stance is not only understandable but is something that should be encouraged. For some Basques, by no means all but a decent enough amount, Athletic Club is an expression of their Basque identity. Playing for the club is an honour. Can you imagine if you grew up in a household where it was drilled into you from birth that you were Basque and that Athletic Bilbao was the Basque club, your parents took you to the games, your free time was basically based around Bilbao's fixtures and the high point of the year was beating the Castillian club? Etxeberria played the last season of his career for Athletic for free...
 
If the loophole in the tax were established and understood for the Martinez deal and we used the exact same people, why did the deal fall through?
The latest theory, from a very reliable source, is that Bilbao refused to let the money be transferred into their account. They did this with Bayern Munich for the Martinez deal, but Bayern got the Government to put pressure on them to allow the transfer, we didn't have the time to do this.
 
The only way I can see United getting him is if we come out and say we didn't have time and still want him. Blame Bilbao for stalling or something. It's clearly our fault for waiting and general ineptitude, but there has to be a way to save face with the player because he's going to catch hell for at least 4 months.
 
Depending on how much you want to believe this blogger, we were played by Bilbao.

http://enentredicho.wordpress.com/2013/09/03/que-ha-pasado-con-ander-herrera/

He wanted us, we wanted him and we were there to pay his clause.

1. We sent the law firm to pay his clause.
2. Athletic said "nope, we will not receive your money."
3. United had instructed the reps to pull the plug if issues occurred.
4. During the Martinez deal, Athletic said the same to Bayern, who then turn to governmental entities to put pressure on Athletic.
5. With so little time left of the window, United couldn't force the issue and pulled the plug to focus on Fellaini.

Edit: Forgot Danillaco's quick translation:

If this be case... we should have done our transfer business much earlier to overcome such unforeseen obstacles...

We could have easily saved 4 mil !!!
 
If the loophole in the tax were established and understood for the Martinez deal and we used the exact same people, why did the deal fall through?

Time + sudden awareness we were being taken to the cleaners to get Fellaini. There's one thing worse than explaining why you ended paying 4M more than needed a month ago (without having had the player for key games), and that's overpaying 4M on Fellaini AND Herrera. That would blow the agreed/expected transfer budget and invite far more enquiry from the bosses.

I don't think it was ever either/or, more a case of both within a certain budget or one alone.
 
The latest theory, from a very reliable source, is that Bilbao refused to let the money be transferred into their account. They did this with Bayern Munich for the Martinez deal, but Bayern got the Government to put pressure on them to allow the transfer, we didn't have the time to do this.

So basically, our hopes rested on Bilbao's stubbornness, anything else was destined to fail?

Will be interesting to see what the actual bid was, if it was 35.9eu, then it seems there nothing else we could have done.
 
So basically, our hopes rested on Bilbao's stubbornness, anything else was destined to fail?

Will be interesting to see what the actual bid was, if it was 35.9eu, then it seems there nothing else we could have done.
Yeah, he said the deal was practically impossible. He was the journalist who broke the news of our bid on Thursday. Hopefully we'll go back and get him in January.
 
The player himself is speaking tomorrow if his mate is to be believe.

Hmm...thanks. Will be interesting to hear any non-speculative detail. I suppose he'll be careful not burn his bridges either way but the general thrust of what he says should give us a good idea on who's to blame.

Would be a real pity if we genuinely want him and have antagonised him in all this last minute mess.
 
To play the devils advocate and conspiracy theorist, any chance we purposely "pulled out" of this deal because Fellaini eventually came through?

I was actually a bit skeptical we were willing to pay close to 60m for 2 midfielders! Its not like we've even sold Anderson and then of course there is Cleverley and Carrick still at the club.
 
If these latest developments or revealings are indeed true, then my only issue would be why did we wait so long to make it happen. Of course, the player might have delayed on making up his mind too. I really hope this explanation is true so that we can go back in January to get him as I think he's a talent and what could be missing from our team.
 
Lowe says Herrera will get the worst of it and compares his case to Llorente's. Blames United. Says we underestimated how complex the deal would be and rocked up thinking we could do it at the last minute. Says the feeling from Spain is that Man Utd made a real mess of this.

In fairness, he said that these deals are extremely difficult & just like in England - many people in Spain hate United as much, so many will have agenda's when reporting this story. Don't recall him sayin we made a mess of it, but he said we were unprepared for this type of deal - does that make us any worse than Bayern though. Sure it took them a bloody month or more to sort their Martinez deal out - doubt they were expectin that & I'd say the Laffabaffajaffa lads were on the clock & milked the complete absolute shit out of it!
 
agree with stretch. Praying we are not at fault here (apart from being stupidly thick with time) Would love the chance to sign him again. It's down to the players interpretation of events really. personally I think we bottled it at the last second because we're tight cnuts.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.