My mistake, I quoted the wrong quote from your exchange with
@Irwin99. My point was: Irwin99 speculated as to wether it was training that puts others ahead of Amad for playing time, you brought forth Ten Hag’s absolutely interesting quotes post Liverpool (indeed giving arguments why Amad should play more), Irwin99 nuances that it could be other needs TH has from his players, you speculate that it’s because TH is not a good coach (partly contradicting your own TH quote?). Whereas Fletchers interview post Liverpool is a bit more specific as to what Amad still is developping (to which the L’pool game was a clear step forward, though not necessarily the end station).
My take-home from this, is that Amad trains very well, but is lacking (yet) in game understanding, particularily in off-the-ball aspects (which is 95% of the game). He has gotten feed back from the coaching team and is starting to implement it just now.
The idiot interpretation is that ETH has no principles or structure demands for team movement, it looks disordered so it must be total chaos, and that Ten Hag, because he is stupid, will always a player who plays rubbish in a match over one who plays well in training if he gets to choose.
A more likely interpretation for me is that the team looks disordered because Ten Hag is struggling to get the players to understand and execute his movement principles and structure demands, and that as disappointing as Rashford, Antony and a few times Garnacho has been on the ball or tracking back (occasionally), they are still better at understanding Ten Hag’s demands for off-the-ball movement, and that TH prioritizes this over technical ability exactly because team disorder is the biggest issue this season.