Tuppet
New Member
Me.Have read through the whole 30 pages and this sounds fun. Anyone want an AM who can help?
Me.Have read through the whole 30 pages and this sounds fun. Anyone want an AM who can help?
It will be interesting to see how this draft pans out with so many players who were great for the club they'll be used from for a season or two. Personally I rate Nani for United higher than Robben at Chelsea for example if we're speaking peak with that standard.
Disagree actually, Robben was excellent at Chelsea when fit and it was niggling injuries that limited his impact as opposed to anything to do with his performances. In his first season in particular he was fantastic and I remember wishing United had signed him.
I think he had similar problems at Real Madrid when they bought him.
Simply not true at all.
What I said is true - Robben was excellent at Chelsea when he was fit, his issue was hamstring injuries that kept reoccurring. In my opinion he was quite comfortably better than Nani and, particularly in that first season, looked like a potential world beater who United should have signed.
I'm not sure what you thought you were responding to though as you went on a tangent there - Robben is clearly better at Bayern than he was Madrid or Chelsea, particularly in terms of his end product.
I never mentioned anything about that though, all I said is that I disagree Nani at his peak was better than Robben at his peak at Chelsea which I believe is true.
Who's pick is it?? Wont be on much until about 7am so can I leave picks with someone...
Disagree actually, Robben was excellent at Chelsea when fit and it was niggling injuries that limited his impact as opposed to anything to do with his performances. In his first season in particular he was fantastic and I remember wishing United had signed him.
I think he had similar problems at Real Madrid when they bought him.
Robben had a cracking 6 month spell for Chelsea but injuries and not being in favor with Jose meant he did not really shine after that
6 months is a bit harsh. His first two seasons were very good and he was an important part of that ruthless Chelsea unit, giving it some much-needed width and flair (which they long missed until Hazard arrived). Agree on his third season though, it frittered away with injuries and a parting of the ways was inevitable.Aye, six months sounds about right, question is then: what is peak form? Same goes for Hargreaves' single season, etc.
So good, Blackburn refused to buy Zidane because they had him.
I think with the benefit of history, we can all look back at this as a decision well made. And just look at that hair!
I'm undecided. It could have been this
6 months is a bit harsh. His first two seasons were very good and he was an important part of that ruthless Chelsea unit, giving it some much-needed width and flair (which they long missed until Hazard arrived). Agree on his third season though, it frittered away with injuries and a parting of the ways was inevitable.
I pick Dietmar Hamann.
Hamann...seriously!! Wanted him!I pick Dietmar Hamann.
Honestly surprised he has been left out for so long. And when I noticed he hasn't been picked, Hamann became an automatic choice.Hamann...seriously!! Wanted him!
Danger of not having much creativity with Hamann, Wise and Speed. Hard workers yes but killer pass, vision to dissect an opponents defense??... Can't leave it all to King Eric...Honestly surprised he has been left out for so long. And when I noticed he hasn't been picked, Hamann became an automatic choice.
I think we should write every name on the formation sheet like:
Modric(TOT), Ivanovic(CHL) etc.
Wasn't online at that time. Had to come back, see what all has been picked and then made the choice.Just realised @coolredwine took three hours to pick