Norris
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2015
- Messages
- 7,401
Fine fine. Moi shall follow the rules then.That;s fine, but it is a blanket rule to avoid any problems.
Fine fine. Moi shall follow the rules then.That;s fine, but it is a blanket rule to avoid any problems.
One of them is probably our next pick, very underrated and a top bowler imo.Fine fine. Moi shall follow the rules then.
Meh, I'll leave those names out for another 1 hour and I am sure nobody will pick them.
He is looking through the 70's to find a player from the time Cricket was a real sport.
It isn't him but edit out the name
He is looking through the 70's to find a player from the time Cricket was a real sport.
BurnnnnnnHe is looking through the 70's to find a player from the time Cricket was a real sport.
And I think I know which one you mean as well.One of them is probably our next pick, very underrated and a top bowler imo.
I think I know who you mean. Good chance he'll be off by this round.There is one batsman whose record is better than most playes picked till now but he won't be picked soon imo.
I was kiddingAnd I think I know which one you mean as well.
I think I know who you mean. Good chance he'll be off by this round.
Would fielding be a key discussion in the match threads ?
Prove it then.I forgot to mention you are allowed to select women in this draft as long as they have played 50 ODIs. I'm all for equality.
Prove it then.
Ok.
New Rule
Anyone's username with numbers in it has to have at least 6 women internationals in their team.
Poor @paulscholes18 . He's screwed.Ok.
New Rule
Anyone's username with numbers in it has to have at least 6 women internationals in their team.
I forgot to mention you are allowed to select women in this draft as long as they have played 50 ODIs. I'm all for equality.
Spoiler it ffs!
Who is she?