antohan
gets aroused by tagline boobs
The Scots are known to be very impartial...
Oh, I know, not questioning that for one minute . I was referring to both of them being given similar billing
The Scots are known to be very impartial...
You didn't get my point. Terry never went off on one the way Passarella did. The guy next to Passarella must be ready to sweep up behind him when he goes all gung-ho. Carvalho doesn't look to me like someone who sweeps up, doesn't really have some key attributes for it. Neither did Vidic, mind. You would have the same problem with both of those.
To be fair, Passarella going off is also a strength - don't look at it only as a weakness.
Of course it is! I did build my defence around him in another draft. But I had McGrath next to him.
Yes, Carvalho reads the game well and certainly is a better option than Terry (or Vidic) alongside Passarella, but at this level he will be exposed if his partner buggers off all the time. Actually, I thought Thuram would be a better partner and that you should have gone for a RB if you couldn't find a suitable companion.
I'd say he's regularly shown his strengths as a sweeper alongside Pepe and Andrade. Deceptively quick, intelligent use of the ball, excellent reading of the game - I think the criticism's harsh. He doesn't match up the defensive colossus' of yesteryear but as far as modern defenders go he's comfortably in that bracket behind Nesta/Rio.
Thuram as a sweeper? we have different ideas of their strengths then.
Not as a sweeper, as a CB who can hold his own if the other CB buggers off to join the attack, you are left with more space to cover, much like a sweeper.
I'm not saying you need to play a sweeper next to Passarella, nor that Thuram is one. In fact, Carvalho does edge Thuram in some of the necessary attributes TBH.
It does depend on the amount of cover other players can contribute as well. I suppose with the DM pair you have it is safe to assume when Passarella goes forward one of them will cover for him.
Now, if that is not the case and you have uber-attacking fullbacks you certainly are buggered.
You didn't get my point. Terry never went off on one the way Passarella did. The guy next to Passarella must be ready to sweep up behind him when he goes all gung-ho. Carvalho doesn't look to me like someone who sweeps up, doesn't really have some key attributes for it. Neither did Vidic, mind. You would have the same problem with both of those.
We pick 1975 Ballon D'or winner, Oleh Blokhin.
Dunno about thisistheone, NM didn't PM it me!
Cannot believe he lasted this long, and some of the picks that went before him in the same position made it even stranger.
Great pick up.
, Schiaffino made his mark with Peñarol, one of that city's two famous clubs. A players' strike before the 1959 South American Cup tournament meant that the Uruguayans entered a team made up, technically, of amateurs, but, as one of them, Schiaffino comfortably held his own against more established players. By 1950, he was a major star, an outstanding positional player who could dribble past opponents with ease.
The vagaries of the 1950 competition, which attracted only 13 finalists, meant that, to qualify for the final pool, Uruguay had merely to beat the feeble Bolivians; this they did 8-0, with Schiaffino helping himself to four of the goals. A contorted system decreed there be no final as such; the winners of the final pool would take the cup, and Brazil had a one point lead over the Uruguayans. All they needed to win was a draw.
Uruguay held out against terrific pressure, with Brazil urged on by a fanatical crowd. When Friaca scored for Brazil early in the second half, that seemed to be that. But twice in the first half, Schiaffino had threatened a goal. When served by Miguez, and the little right-winger Ghiggia, he struck a shot which the Brazilian keeper, Barbosa, only just managed to reach. Then, coming suddenly to life from seeming torpor, Schiaffino dribbled his way clean through Brazil's defence, only for Barbosa to frustrate him again.
But it could not last. For all the crowd's triumphalism, Schiaffino had plainly found the range. In the second half, Uruguay counter-attacked often and crisply. Obdulio Varela, their heroic centre-half and captain, sent Chico Ghiggia flying down the right wing. His cross, astoundingly, found Schiaffino unmarked. He took four strides forward, then walloped his shot past Barbosa to make the Uruguayans level. Fourteen minutes later, Ghiggia scored the winner.
I'll pick Juan Alberto Schiaffino.
Here's a little description of the man
Moving fast now!
You live up to your user name.
Made me laugh all the way through the draft: comeon,comeon,comeon, whose turn is it, whose turn is it, WHOSE TURN IS IT!!
Left backs are at a premium now but happy to get one with over 400 caps for Real Madrid during their dominance of La Liga in the 70s/80s. Jose Antonio Camacho
Question for the drafters: how many popular, genuine vote-winning names do you reckon are left out there?
Popular being the operative word, not necessarily quality.
Cannot believe he lasted this long, and some of the picks that went before him in the same position made it even stranger.
Great pick up.
I'll pick Juan Alberto Schiaffino.
Here's a little description of the man
Left backs are at a premium now but happy to get one with over 400 caps for Real Madrid during their dominance of La Liga in the 70s/80s. Jose Antonio Camacho
Neither do I, particularly with him featuring and winning in the final of the 50s game and being Ukrainian! They were very lucky I didn't get him this round (I guess that's why they waited for my turn to announce their reinforcements coming soon )
I think I know Nms next pick as well, the delay on that makes more sense.
You'd better not come up against EDogen or he will produce a very random clip of "Dzajic v. Camacho" that is floating around on the internet.
In fairness, despite it being made with a clear Dzajic agenda, you end up concluding Camacho was a lot better than thought and Dzajic not as good (past his prime).
Question for the drafters: how many popular, genuine vote-winning names do you reckon are left out there?
Popular being the operative word, not necessarily quality.
I watched that clip yesterday, good stuff!
There's a better one which shows dribbles, crosses, free kicks... The shame is most of the dribbling examples, while , he ends up dispossesed eventually, or makes a rubbish cross. You conclude he wasn't as good as made out to be, then they move to FKs and you think "lots of people score from FKs, is that all you've got?". Only when I was about to stop wasting my time, they show you actual good crosses, then goals, etc.
It's a very strange clip.
Fergus is a right lazy fecker, he's never around in the mornings.
But now he seems to be online! These last few rounds should be interesting.
Fergus is a right lazy fecker, he's never around in the mornings.