All-Time Fantasy Draft - NM v Isotope

Who will win based on players in their prime, team tactics, balance & bench strength?


  • Total voters
    32
  • Poll closed .

Brwned

Have you ever been in love before?
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Messages
50,937
NM said:
Formation:
Tactics

Defense: Passarella and Carvalho are a brilliant "fire and ice" combination. Carvalho Passarella are also wonderful passers of the ball - they will easily be able to find my midfielders in space. We all know Passarella loves to burst forward - and having Thuram at RB ensures he can move in and cover for him. Carvalho is also a great reader of the game - together they will easily cover this. I also have Cole and Carvalho playing alongside each other. Having defenders that have played together and understand each other can only help is the draft from different eras.

Midfield: Neeskens and Tardelli are 2 of the best midfielders of all time. Neeskens is really like having two players - he will track back, and also has the vision and range of a playmaker. They are also two of the hardest workers in the game - they can easily match up with any 3 man midfield in the world. The quality of my wingers and attack also ensures that they will focus solely on the midfield battle.
My wingers Boniek and Blokhin are two of the best dribblers in the world. They also have exceptionally high work rates - Boniek especially. They will keep bombing up and down the flanks and both are more than happy to cut infield and help out with the midfield battle when needed.

Attack: Pele will have a free role playing behind Ruminiegge. He will be free to do as he pleases, and will be impossible for the defense to mark. Doing this will relieve the pressure on my midfield as well.
Ruminiegge will be up top, and will link brilliantly with Pele and my dribblers. Together I have the best collection of dribblers in the draft. No defense will keep them out. Ruminiegge is also brilliant as a creator and finisher. My wingers and forwards all complement each other and will perform in perfect harmony.

I will win because:
Better Defenders
His full backs will be pinned back by my wingers
I have the hardest working midfield in the draft
Pele and Ruminiegge is arguably the greatest partnership in the draft
2 of my defenders (Cole and Carvalho) and 2 of my midfielders (Boniek and Tardelli) have played with each other. This understanding is crucial.

NM said:
Key Points:

The midfield battle is now a toss up. Neeskens and Tardelli are more than a match for Matthaus and Vieira

Blokhin and Boniek will get even more room to operate now. Irwin in particular will get targeted

Pele and Rummenigge will have even more room. When Pele drops deep, there is nobody picking him up.

There are still not enough goals/attacking threat in his team.

Quite simply:
My attack> His attack
Midfield is about equal
His attack poses much less of a threat to my defense that my attack does to his.

Quite simply - he can't control possession now - it will be a battle. Plus evertime he loses the ball my wingers will rilp him to pieces. Tardelli and Neeskens will also have much more freedom now.

Player Profiles
https://www.redcafe.net/f7/all-time-fantasy-draft-365063/index70.html#post12917581
https://www.redcafe.net/f7/all-time-fantasy-draft-365063/index70.html#post12917584

Do not be confused by 2 vs 3 in midfield or anything like that. My midfield , and the workrate of my wingers more than makes up for it.

Team NM
626997_Argentina.jpg
NM said:
At 5-6 a change is made.

635018_Brazil.jpg


Team Isotope

Isotope said:
At 12-12 a change is made.

abEbqXdam2.jpg

abEb1Z5anB.jpg

Isotope said:

Team Preview


The team is a blend of creativity and ball possession, while not neglecting goal productivity. The Veron – Zico – Hagi trio would ensure the creativity. The steel in midfield is assured by Matthäus and Vieira presence, who are good passers as well. With Veron’s pulling the string in midfield, and Hagi and Zico in attack, the team have personals to control the game.

On goal productivity, Zico, Hagi, and Matthaus are all double figures goalscorer. Although not as prolific as pure striker, Raul’s ability to drift inside and out is an important asset to bring these goalscoring midfielders into the play.

Defence is marshaled by Santamaria and Hansen, a partnership based on their best attributes, as every great team have. Hansen is one of the all-time best ball playing centerbacks, while Santamaria as this strong, uncompromising defender. Defense is completed with the speedy tough tackling defensive minded Cordoba and attacking minded Antonio Cabrini on fullback to balance the side.

Player Profiles
 
NM team has no playmaker to control his team flow.
And Carvalho is a good defender, but not sure he's capable against great players as one of the last defence.
 
NM has the best front 4 in the entire draft, unquestionably.

Boniek, Rummenigge, Blokhin and Pele :drool:
 
Maybe. But they are still waiting for the ball that rarely arrive. When they have, they'll just play within themselves as no one able to control the game.

Every great team always have one player to control his team flow. Who that will be in NM team?
 
Possibly, Neeskens is one of the greatest centre mids of all time though, likewise Tardelli who is better than any on the pitch bar Matthaus and Neeskens. Neeskens will need a big game but its the exact type he would be up for IMO.

Edit - you edited that post after I responded! Clear that Pele is NM's main attacking outlet, outrageous talent aside, NM has positioned him in the hole and said he has given him a free role to influence the match.

Like I said though NM's front four are all incredible, someone like Rummenigge was a two time Ballon D'or winner and as complete a forward you will find. He's more than capable of creating chances.
 
Maybe. But they are still waiting for the ball that rarely arrive. When they have, they'll just play within themselves as no one able to control the game.

Every great team always have one player to control his team flow. Who that will be in NM team?

Pelé.
 
That will be an interesting point if NM or Theon can confirm it.
what's to confirm? its common sense. Your mid-field will NOT have control - it will be your 3 versus my 2 with Pele being the outlet. your fullbacks will be pinned back by my wingers., who are easy outlets for me. Passarella and Carvalho's passing range will ensure my midfield never get the ball under pressure.. In effect, you will have 5 men sitting back in your own half while I boss possession. Its easy to talk crap, but if you actually look at your formation, it makes no sense. You will not have the ball, and my attack will rip you apart.
 
Isotope - I don't know we wre voting for our teams, but ok, I'll do it too!
 
some thoughts from Theon.

Yeah contrary to what Brwned is implying I love that formation and its exactly the one I suggested to Fergus to use. Issue is I don't think Isotope has the players for it at all, whereas Fergus does.

His wingbacks aren't as suited to playing the excessively attacking game needed to stretch the pitch, not that they could anyway, it would be lunacy to attack with his fullbacks and just leave the lightning fast Boniek and Blokhin with noone marking them.

Zico isn't a forward but an attacking midfielder, so Raul is going to be stood up there on his own. With very limited width being provided then the backline will be more than comfortable tucking in and dealing with the solitary Raul. Zico and Hagi are in danger of getting in each others way, but more importantly the affect on the central midfielders is counter productive.

You have the best box-to-box player ever in Matthaus, yet deny him the space to operate by playing so narrowly. Doesn't make sense. If the game is open and stretched then he has the ability to completely dictate, but instead he's competing with Zico and Hagi and if he tries to bomb forward he's just running into the two attacking midfielders. There is no threat for the defence because it's such a narrow attack, Matthaus is just running into an already prepared, settled and comfortable backline.

Fourthly, there isn't even a spearhead to this narrow attack. I mean even Raul drops off for feck sake. He isn't a classic number 9 who is going to play the offside trap and just wait for through balls. Instead he's another player that will look to get into that space in front of the defence.. which is preoccupied by Hagi, Zico and a frustrated Matthaus.

:lol: How can you say we only have Tardelli and Neeskens, and then contrast that with your midfielders and forwards?!

If you are going to include your AM in Hagi and your two strikers of Zico and Raul in 'dominating the play', then how can you just ignore Pele, Rummenigge, Boneik and Blokhin? It makes no sense, you are discounting our attacking players and including yours.

You have two centre mids, we have two and between the two sets I don't see any clear winning pair in a midfield battle. Matthaus is probably the best, but Neeskens isn't far behind and Viera is definitely the worst of the four, particularly as a ballwinner where Tardelli outclasses him. So overall I think it is fair even and there isn't the slightest indication that you will dominate the midfield. In contrast, I think the exact opposite, particularly when you include Boniek and Blokhin getting involved. Who is going to close them down? You don't have any players on the flanks.

With the bolded bit, Boniek and Blokhin were well known for their workrate man, particularly the former! There is zero issues in getting them to track back.. Not that even especially need to as there isn't any wingers to track.

They are both hardworkers and well know for their workrate, tracking back isn't an issue and it would be disingenuous to portray it as if it is. But to be honest it isn't even much of a concern - Boniek and Blokhin tracking back will have minimal impact on the game because you have zero threat down the flanks. The much bigger question is whether Irwin and Cabrini can handle the two wingers.

How can you safely say you will win the midfield battle? What is a statement like that based on? You are outnumbered in midfield and attack due to having Cordoba twiddling his fingers on the edge of your area. Tardelli/Neeskens vs Matthaus/Viera is as close a contest as you can get. Being objective, Matthaus is the best player, but Viera is the worst especially in such an aggressive, ballwinning contest like that.

I can't see how you will win the midfield. You have Hagi who offers sod all in the contest, to complete a midfield three. Whereas we have Boniek and Blokhin who both outwork him and come together to make a midfield four..

Fair enough, well if you don't know much about him you shouldn't say that he has a poor workrate and won't track back! You don't win the Ballon D'Or without being a great player, and he didn't just win in 1975 but absolutely smashed the voting. Of the 26 voters 20 voted Blokhin the best player in Europe, with Cruyff third and Beckenbauer second.

With Raul, yeah he will obviously drop deep and in the right system that would help control the play, but you have Zico and Hagi doing exactly that. He isn't needed, two players looking to get into the hole is arguably too many, let alone three. You'd be better off with an actual number 9 who looks to latch onto the through balls from Hagi and Zico.
 
what's to confirm? its common sense. Your mid-field will NOT have control - it will be your 3 versus my 2 with Pele being the outlet. your fullbacks will be pinned back by my wingers., who are easy outlets for me. Passarella and Carvalho's passing range will ensure my midfield never get the ball under pressure.. In effect, you will have 5 men sitting back in your own half while I boss possession. Its easy to talk crap, but if you actually look at your formation, it makes no sense. You will not have the ball, and my attack will rip you apart.

:lol: I have Zico, Hagi, Veron, Matthaus, and Viera sitting back and not bossing your midfield? Not to mention you have Carvalho in your last defense line; which I think he's the worst centerback in the whole draft.
 
What I'd like to point out is:

I have the best forward partnership in the draft!!

Boniek and Blokhin will rip Cordoba and Cabrini a new one!!

My midfield will have Boniek helping out, and Pele as playmaker. We will NOT be overrun - don't be fooled by Iso's lies.

There is no way his attack is getting past my defense

Familiarity: Carvalho & cole were part of Cehlssea's great defense. Tardelli and Boniek were part of the great Juventus team of the 80s. My team knows how to play with each other.

Lastlly, Tardelli, Neeskens and my center backs are great passers of the ball. My wingers and forwards will be easily released.
 
:lol: I have Zico, Hagi, Veron, Matthaus, and Viera sitting back and not bossing your midfield? Not to mention you have Carvalho in your last defense line; which I think he's the worst centerback in the whole draft.

You have Cordoba- one of the worst fullbacks in the draft. Also I'm sure Carvalho is terrible. That's why Chelsea conceded so few goals when he was around. It was all due to John Superman Terry. :wenger:

you have 0 width in your side. Your fullbacks won't be going past the halfway line. Quite simply - Pele is in a different class to anyone else in your team, and you have nobody on him
 
What the hell is Passarella doing on the right? He is left footed.
 
What the hell is Passarella doing on the right? He is left footed.

He's on the right so Thuram can drop into CB when Passarella carries the ball. Can't think of a better fullback for the job than Thuram.
 
Tom Finney should be starting IMO.

I'll see how this one pans out first. Seems like not many really rate him as I and you do. I still have Hagi that can play on the wing, and Cabrini on the left providing width.
 
Just trying to shore up my defence, allowing Cabrini to attack more on the other side, while covering Veron and Hagi on the right side. Also to cover when Hansen going forward.
 
I'll be back in here after the game. Lets go United!
 
Iso has a DM, two CM's, two AM's and a forward who likes to drop deep.

I mean seriously, it's mental how narrow and packed his midfield is.

The entire game will be based on two of the greatest wingers of all time in Boniek and Blokhin exploiting weak fullbacks and a ridiculous amount of space. Hopefully some voters remember Boniek and his achievements with Juve, then on the other flank Blokhin is equally talented, comprehensively voted the best in Europe in the 1975 Ballon d'Or.

Both are famous for their dribbling and exceptional speed, providing an unmatched threat on the counter. Simply put, there is no way Iso's narrow set up could cope with that level of ability.
 
Cabrini is one of the best left back of all time. How do you think he's weak has shown your true BIAS opinion as assistant manager. Your wingers have to help your midfield that being over-run by mine. Then there's NONE to control your game flow. None! You can use Pele (as Brwned suggested) but then he has to drop deep to pick up the ball, and lessen his attack power.

I have Veron that can pin point passes to counter-attack, if needed.
 
I agree with Iso on that one. You might question Irwin's ability to deal with Blokhin to an extent, but saying Cabrini can't do a job on Boniek is simply illogical and very convenient to say the least.
 
Cabrini is one of the best left back of all time. How do you think he's weak has shown your true BIAS opinion as assistant manager. Your wingers have to help your midfield that being over-run by mine. Then there's NONE to control your game flow. None! You can use Pele (as Brwned suggested) but then he has to drop deep to pick up the ball, and lessen his attack power.

I have Veron that can pin point passes to counter-attack, if needed.

Yes - Cabrini with no help at all from midfield. While my front four are the most fluid in the draft. Your defense won't have a clue. good luck picking the ball out of your net. The point is quite simple - your full backs will be pinned back - you will have no width, no outlets and I'll pick you off after your stuck in your half.
 
It was more about Cordoba, but Cabrini's strength was surely getting forward, providing crosses to Rossi for Italy in WC 1982, compared to Thuram for example who is all about defending.
 
I have Veron that can pin point passes to counter-attack, if needed.

This is absurd. Counter attack to who? You have no width and no one up there bar Raul, counter attacking is just not going to happen in such a congested and narrow set up.
 
Lothar was a great counter attacking player though. Throughout his Inter career he used to initiate and join counters being a marauding central midfielder in an otherwise very defensive team, and walking past the opposition. He is capable of doing that here as he is considerably a cut above the rest of the CMs on the pitch.
 
Lothar was a great counter attacking player though. Throughout his Inter career he used to initiate and join counters being a marauding central midfielder in an otherwise very defensive team, and walking past the opposition. He is capable of doing that here as he is considerably a cut above the rest of the CMs on the pitch.

And Vieira is considerably the weakest CM on the pitch. I have sent a formation PM to Brnwed.
 
Well I'm not as big a fan of Tardelli as you guys are, so I would not say that is true. I'd say one out of Veron or Tardelli would be weakest out of the 5, with Matthaus in front by a huge lead and Vieira and Neeskens somewhere in between.
 
Well I'm not as big a fan of Tardelli as you guys are, so I would not say that is true. I'd say one out of Veron or Tardelli would be weakest out of the 5, with Matthaus in front by a huge lead and Vieira and Neeskens somewhere in between.

Neeskens isn't that far off and is comfortably better than Vieira.
 
Not a chance in my book. Lothar's completeness, determination and the sheer ability to take any damn midfield by the scruff of it's neck and humiliate it puts him on another level. Not everyday you see Maradona calling someone his toughest rival.
 
Not a chance in my book. Lothar's completeness, determination and the sheer ability to take any damn midfield by the scruff of it's neck and humiliate it puts him on another level. Not everyday you see Maradona calling someone his toughest rival.

And only once have you seen a player like Neeskens in that Dutch team.
 
Anyway, I don't understand why you guys have spent so much time since the initial stages of the draft talking up players like Tardelli, Neeskens and all while hardly saying anything about the best player in your team. If anyone is capable of winning this game for you, it is Pele, not Neeskens, not Tardelli and not anyone else. Don't assume everyone already knows what he can do because frankly I think many can do with reading few instances of his greatness.
 
Anyway, I don't understand why you guys have spent so much time since the initial stages of the draft talking up players like Tardelli, Neeskens and all while hardly saying anything about the best player in your team. If anyone is capable of winning this game for you, it is Pele, not Neeskens, not Tardelli and not anyone else. Don't assume everyone already knows what he can do because frankly I think many can do with reading few instances of his greatness.

I did assume everybody knew Pele but I'l talk after the game.
 
Well I'm not as big a fan of Tardelli as you guys are, so I would not say that is true. I'd say one out of Veron or Tardelli would be weakest out of the 5, with Matthaus in front by a huge lead and Vieira and Neeskens somewhere in between.

:lol: Jesus christ.

Tardelli about the same level as Veron and worse than Viera? Viera about the same as Neeskens!?!

Aldo, how are Viera and Neeskens a similar standard? Complete rubbish.
 
Both are great box to box players who have been engines of great club and national sides of their generation and add immense stamina and work rate with great ability on the ball. Neeskens is probably more creative out of the two but I think Vieira was very good defensively, not that Neeskens wasn't. No one can deny that Arsenal downfall has a lot to do with losing Vieira, probably more than losing Henry or Bergkamp. They have managed to create some brilliant attacking players but they were never able to replace that grit, determination and leadership Vieira brought. Being compared to Keane many times is a testimony to his stature.
 
I've watched Vieira playing countless times. He's done it in domestic and international stages. To say that Neeskens or Tardelli much better than him, how can you be sure?

People said Vieira is rival to Keano. I think that's how high people thought about him. Is Keane so much worse than Neeskens or Tardelli?
 
This is absurd. Counter attack to who? You have no width and no one up there bar Raul, counter attacking is just not going to happen in such a congested and narrow set up.

So do you think Zico and Hagi just disappeared? Do you know any of them actually?
 
So who will be the playmaker in NM's team? Tardelli? Neeskens? Pele?

NM's team play would be predictable. Viera or Matthaus will shut off Pele, thus your DM's duo would just spray it to the wing and make crosses.

Mine would control the game, with such passers as Zico, Raul, Hagi and Veron. Your wingers would just painfully waiting and waiting and waiting for your midfield to get the ball.