All-time Fantasy Draft - KM v Paceme

Who will win based on players in their prime, team tactics, balance & bench strength?


  • Total voters
    36
  • Poll closed .
I guess I'll give my vote then. I agree with Paceme that with Sammer dropping into defense, it has given him the control of midfield and has put your defense under constant pressure. And with Gullit and Batistuta being players who can completely take CBs out of the game, any knock downs would be extremely fatal with the runs being made by Schuster and Socrates. And given that much time in midfield, I am sure Socrates or Schuster can come up with a moment of magic after trying a few times. Your midfield is hardworking, but lacks steel at the moment and hence my vote goes to art lover Paceme.
 
I just knew I shouldn't have recommended promoting you.
 
I just knew I shouldn't have recommended promoting you.

:lol:

And thanks a lot for that, as I never knew that fact so far. I was undecided with your earlier team, but it's tough with this one. Antohan suggested bringing on Busquets, I guess he had the same concern as me that it lacked a bit of ball winning ability. Nedved as the AM with Busquets and the Magyar controlling midfield would look more assured IMO.
 
Busquets should be playing in that set up, undoubdetly for me.
 
Rubbish! Don't know what Anto was getting at when he called Djalma Santos defensive either. Certainly he excelled in that area and he was defensive compared to Nilton Santos but he was up and down that wing all day long once Brazil moved to the 424. Never fazed on the ball, smart passer and great stamina = big threat with that kind of space in front of him.

He could go forward, and occasionally did, to good effect indeed, but nowhere near as much as Nilton. I would consider him more a Thuram (the sort we saw on a bright WC semifinal day) than a Cafú, although I'm thinking mostly '58, maybe he was more adventurous later on. Or maybe it was just Garrincha leaving him too exposed and making him prioritise defence rather than express himself.
 
Busquets should be playing in that set up, undoubdetly for me.

Seems I'm not alone then. Nedved-Valderrama-Bozsic looks like an excessive emphasis on creativity, yet I can't quite figure out what it would stack up to. I would definitely get shot of Valderrama and stick Busquets on there.
 
:lol:

And thanks a lot for that, as I never knew that fact so far. I was undecided with your earlier team, but it's tough with this one. Antohan suggested bringing on Busquets, I guess he had the same concern as me that it lacked a bit of ball winning ability. Nedved as the AM with Busquets and the Magyar controlling midfield would look more assured IMO.

Agree that Busquets would bring more balance, although there's merit in Nedved being left of a three to enable him to carry out some of that effective hard running into fairly empty flanks.
 
Agree that Busquets would bring more balance, although there's merit in Nedved being left of a three to enable him to carry out some of that effective hard running into fairly empty flanks.

Indeed, I would have him in a three, not AM
 
2prwcib.jpg


Another change.

Busquets on for Valderramma

Will give my team more defensive stability and add some much needed steel in the midfield. Currently the best defensive midfielder in the world.
 
Just giving it a BUMP!
 
I can see Paceme scoring through Gordillo getting forward and swinging in a deep cross for Batistuta / Gullit to attack. Both of them are better in the air than Sammer and Scirea. Similarly, can't see much resistance from Socrates and Schuster to prevent Lizarazu and Nedved from moving up and working something intricate with Messi and Schiaffino.
 
Disappointed that no one gave thier views on how Sammer as sweeper and Scirera as CB would function. I was thinking to do something similar with my team but concluded that people would think its a waste of one of them, in this case Scirera?
 
Ah well, 15 mins left. Unlikely we will get a vote in now. Hopefully Gio votes as he hasn't so far.
 
I prefer Km's 3-5-2 but felt Figueroa - Baresi had a better blend of qualities to deal with Messi - Schiaffino than Sammer - Scirea - Pophlar possessed against the dynamism and aerial punch of Bati - Gullit.
 
Lizarazu and Djalma storming down the flanks and giving better play out wide won it for me.
 
I'd be completely against penalties if this was my game, which of the managers hasn't voted?
 
I'm ok for penalties. I'm ok for managers voting.
 
I don't see Pete wanting to do this as a regular thing so my vote goes to Cling Bak for the deciding vote.
 
Yeah fine with me. Let's get this over with.
 
My team also has very attacking full backs. Djalma was better known for defending was he not? I reckon the two full backs will cancel each other out.

Djalma Santos is arguably the greatest attacking full back ever, and started the great tradition of flying Brasilian full backs.