Jammydodger7
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2013
- Messages
- 1,672
Still a few great players I can think of that haven't been nominated!
On the subject of nominations - I have to say it was a bit of a kick in the bollocks that we're only allowed one in this round. Thing is that it's bound to be a bit random whether you get a top notch player for a pittance (because he doesn't fit anyone else's plans) - or lose out on your only nomination.
Still, something will feck up your plans at some point anyway - it's the nature of the game and I ain't going to moan on about it. I do, however, think that it should have been stated at the beginning either a) that each manager would be allowed X nominations in round so-and-so OR that it would be a curve ball sort of thing from the draft master all the way.
Who could have done such a thing ?
Proud of that. Waddle and Fowler for 24 is pretty decent.Waddle for 10 million, absolute steal.
And no Hoddle.
Proud of that. Waddle and Fowler for 24 is pretty decent.
Waddle for 10 million, absolute steal.
And no *******.
Makes up for my first two bids. 100 million spent on Keane and Jennings aloneDecent is an understatement.
I doubt he would have slipped under the radar, but naming unpicked players while we're still drafting is highly frowned upon mate
Ouch, fully apologise.
On the subject of nominations - I have to say it was a bit of a kick in the bollocks that we're only allowed one in this round. Thing is that it's bound to be a bit random whether you get a top notch player for a pittance (because he doesn't fit anyone else's plans) - or lose out on your only nomination.
Still, something will feck up your plans at some point anyway - it's the nature of the game and I ain't going to moan on about it. I do, however, think that it should have been stated at the beginning either a) that each manager would be allowed X nominations in round so-and-so OR that it would be a curve ball sort of thing from the draft master all the way.
The nomination rules, as they stand, clearly do not apply - and haven't been in force at all at any point. I don't mind a curve ball approach - not at all. But I'd prefer it to be stated explicitly that this will be the case.
How does snake work btw? Assuming I get my 12th player on budget I'll have 5 million left, is that enough to play?
Ideally last round would have had 16 and this one would have had 16. But I made it 2+1 so as to avoid all who is nominating how many.
MFs+Defenders got more nominations because you require more of them.
Still 3 round to go where no positional constraint is there so plenty of time left
I'll have him as a sub, and he'll sit there willing me on to win
A maximum of 6 players who are only eligible for England can be part of playing 11 at any point in the match.
Great nomination - no doubt about it.
But you do realize that if you want him as a sub, you need to get in one more non English player, right? You need five non English on the pitch - not in the squad.
Oh feck sake
How my team is shaping up. Waddle is temporarily playing centrally.
Aye - miscounted there. 4 already have keepers - seven have entered bids in this round. So, one man still has no keeper/bid. And one very conspicuous keeper remains un-nominated.
Is it @Gio who doesn't have a GK?
3 after this plus 2 snake onesErr, how many rounds are there left? Some managers running a very thin squad right now.
3 after this plus 2 snake ones
He's laughing his bollocks off, surely. Classic sheep draft thingie, everyone avoiding the obvious trying to avoid a block (or bidding war here)