I think some are criminally underrating Miki and understating Sanchez's contract situation.
indeed. it's a bit mental really.
I think some are criminally underrating Miki and understating Sanchez's contract situation.
The market has exploded since then. Mkhi is better than Sigurdsson and he went for £45 million. We would get that because we want to sell the player rather than a club trying to lure him away but £35m should be bottom line.We got Micky for 26 mil though after his best season and he's clearly regressed since then.
Fair enough, in my world though I hope he does well enough to not get thrown away but far away from well enough to have a effect on Arsenal winning any trophies (although the chances of that are so slim it's hardly worth mentioning).I hope he does well at Arsenal, that doesn't mean i hope Arsenal does well. 10 goals and 10 assists for Mkhi, while Arsenal grab the last EL-spot
Sterling a prime example, he got leathered during the match the other day, which was quite funny I'll admit, but he'll win much more at City than at Liverpool.Agreed. I don't blame any of the players that have left Liverpool or Arsenal in the last 10 years.
You gotta feel for the Club losing top assets without getting money for them but that's football I guess.
Because how dare he look out for his career and take time agreeing personal terms. He should accept whatever and please the impatient United fans!
Some truth in that, but we'd be getting the better end of a swap, no question. Contract situation taken into account, it would be a great piece of business.
Even if that is true, which I'm not sure is, you'd have to ask yourself how Arsenal have let that situation come about.The situation at the club isn't that bad as everyone is making it out to be. I think one of the root causes of their problems on the pitch was Sanchez. The players didn't trust him and it was clear as day. Some players weren't passing to him (Ramsey for example), they hardly celebrated his goals with him and a lot of other players weren't happy with his antics in training either. Getting rid of him is better than keeping him around but I guess the perception of most players is that the team is regressing. They'd have to pay crazy wages get top players though.
If he's now saying that the deal was his idea then he would look foolish if he failed to close it out. Looking foolish is not good for business.Mhikitaryan would be a terrific player for Wenger's side. I'm a huge fan of Mhiki and wanted him to succeed here but it's just so happens that he just doesn't fit Jose's philosophy. Hopefully Raiola doesn't create some sort of issue with regards to wages and prevent the deal from going through. I honestly think we wouldn't have gotten much for Mhiki given his age and current form. In all, I think both parties (Arsenal and United) benefited in the end. United are getting a player that fits in well and so does Arsenal. In fact, Arsenal are getting a quality player without having to get the money and actually buying one after. They could have easily lost Sanchez for free over the summer. They almost got Mhiki for free if you look at it.
We've got to handle this one carefully, as Raiola also represents Pogba. He's already taken Pog away from us once.
No point getting Sánchez and losing an even better player as a consequence.
Even if that is true, which I'm not sure is, you'd have to ask yourself how Arsenal have let that situation come about.
Even if that is true, which I'm not sure is, you'd have to ask yourself how Arsenal have let that situation come about.
Raiola is Pogba's agent, not his boss. Raiola works for Pogba, not the other way around.
Raiola is a greedy bastard who cares only for his bottom line.
Some truth in that, but we'd be getting the better end of a swap, no question. Contract situation taken into account, it would be a great piece of business.
Next title change will probably be "Mikhi still hasn't made up mind, hordes of caftards with blazing torches and pitchforks surrounding his house..."Ooo, thread title change. My spidey senses are tingling.
It didn't help that City waited til the last minute. Seems Wenger had blind faith in Sanchez staying.they should have started negotiations with Lemar far earlier in the summer. they would have rid themselves of a player that didn't want to be there, and had a quality, younger replacement for only about £25-30m more. just bad negotiating from Arsenal all round.
has worked out well for us though.
Sanchez turned 29 last month.Mkhi being only one year younger (turns 29 in 13 days), makes this a very sweet deal. The difference in talent is huge. No hard feelings with Mkhi though, he seemed like a genuinely nice guy but it just didn't work out.
He doesn’t have to be I think the boss has made it clear to him privatley, he’s not in his future plan I.e. he has to go.
Mkhi being only one year younger (turns 29 in 13 days), makes this a very sweet deal. The difference in talent is huge. No hard feelings with Mkhi though, he seemed like a genuinely nice guy but it just didn't work out.
Yup. When Pogba extends his contract it's going to be monster deal that will make Raiola very happy.
Mkhi being only one year younger (turns 29 in 13 days),[/B] makes this a very sweet deal. The difference in talent is huge. No hard feelings with Mkhi though, he seemed like a genuinely nice guy but it just didn't work out.
Mkhi being only one year younger (turns 29 in 13 days), makes this a very sweet deal. The difference in talent is huge. No hard feelings with Mkhi though, he seemed like a genuinely nice guy but it just didn't work out.
Mkhi being only one year younger (turns 29 in 13 days), makes this a very sweet deal. The difference in talent is huge. No hard feelings with Mkhi though, he seemed like a genuinely nice guy but it just didn't work out.
whoever is able to take advantage of Sanchez's contract situation is getting the better deal, because he's available at a cut price. that's almost besides the point.
the question is whether Mhki is worth c.£35m. Ignore Sanchez. if Arsenal like the player and think he's worth it (i.e. they won't be able to spend £35m on another player of equal talent in January - and, frankly, they probably can't) then it's a good deal for them too.
Even sweeterHe is 1 whole month younger mate...
Man, that makes me feel so old.Mkhi is one month younger. Not one year.
Alexis was born on 19th December 1988
Mkhi born on 21st Jan 1989
Man, that makes me feel so old.
.
Yes... Because if you're raiola or pogba you'd reject the tens of millions you'd get from your job
Pogba left because of playing time, and Ferguson hated agents like Raiola (for understandable reasons). Since Fergie left, we've worked more with agents as its the necessary evil to get star players (it cost us Hazard).We've got to handle this one carefully, as Raiola also represents Pogba. He's already taken Pog away from us once.
No point getting Sánchez and losing an even better player as a consequence.
Huge contract for a 29yr old who plays his best on the left where Martial plays.
Wow, for some reason I thought Mikhitaryan was 26 or so.Mkhi is one month younger. Not one year.
Alexis was born on 19th December 1988
Mkhi born on 21st Jan 1989
I think the whole sage rests firmly on Mhki agreeing terms with Arsenal. I think.