lewwoo
Full Member
Ah I never saw that. Thanks.Well, it's not the Guardian alone. Di Marzio also reported it.
Ah I never saw that. Thanks.Well, it's not the Guardian alone. Di Marzio also reported it.
Di Mazrio is possibly the best source in football journalism.
Y'all are gonna be so disappointed when this doesn't happen. Muppet Meltdown Episode #57.
Reeks a bit of desperation from us if it is true. Yes he'd be a good fit for what we need but everything points towards him going to City.
My mate is an Arsenal fan and he thinks 25 mil is great for a player who clearly wants out. He also wants us to take Wenger along with Sanchez.
There really is no chance, but I'd offer him a substantial signing on bonus and 40m-50m to Arsenal.Reeks a bit of desperation from us if it is true. Yes he'd be a good fit for what we need but everything points towards him going to City.
Could also be us trying to make PSG cough up Lucas. Although I'm not sure an extra 20m is going to make them sweat all that much.Arsenal/Sanchez's camp trying to squeeze some more money out of City in the tail end of negotiations. Seems to be relatively common in the closing stages of transfers.
For what it's worth....
Exactly. Which is why the club will unofficially tell some of the journalists to come out and say that we aren’t in for him any minute now surely?Okay after initial wanking over him, i come to realize he isnt coming. Surely we wouldnt have left it so late and Arsenal would be the real winners of this news as this will force city to up the offer.
Its clear its an agent briefing media so as to get city to up their offer. City will get their tagline of him chosing them over us. Arse get their money and as usual our name can be used free of cost. We should start charging clubs/agents for creating interest using our names. We d probably rake in as much as matchday income for united.
Nice one.Very good. di Marzio and The Guardian.
Why does it "reek a bit of desperation"? What act to help us beat City next season wouldn't seem desperate in your opinion?
For what it's worth....
And we can offer a player in return that Arsenal rate and would see as a good replacement.Nice one.
The downside of entering a bidding war with City's oil money is that they can throw in a few free yachts to sweeten the deal.
No need for evidence mate. We believe you.
What does that even mean?
What does that even mean?
30m total? Do it.Just to be clear, are they talking about 25m + Mkhitryan?
Don't get it, what does he mean ?
Delaney isn't the most trusted one I know.
Yeah exactly. He'd start every game for us, he'd instantly be our best player.
I can see why. He seemingly won't be that much of an upgrade on the current City side but will improve us massively.
Anywhere across a front 4 in a 4231. On either side, through the middle, even up top if Lukaku is out.Out of curiosity, let’s say hypothetically that he does come. Where would he play? At #10, RW, LW or CF?
This is genuinely terrible but made me laugh anyway. What happens when you dab?!
Sorry it doesn't make much sense without the previous reply. Someone else replied previously saying the press were just throwing United's name into the mix to create a "United miss out" narrative.
True, but the possibility of throwing Mikhitaryan in a swap deal is a new idea and has to be a very recent development.A last ditch attempt to pull the rug out from under a transfer to another team is a bit desperate. Otherwise we would have laid the ground work for this long ago. It's not like Sanchez leaving Arsenal in January was a secret.
Two guys saying it's a nothing story. Delaney assuring them they're are wrong.
Delaney does get involved in a lot of muppetry though.
Thanks. So he meant that this is wrong and we're really in for him ?
Only thing I can think of is he's responded to the wrong tweetWhat does that even mean?
Out of curiosity, let’s say hypothetically that he does come. Where would he play? At #10, RW, LW or CF?
Two guys saying it's a nothing story. Delaney assuring them they're are wrong.
Delaney does get involved in a lot of muppetry though.
Obvious WUMs are obvious.