Grylte
"nothing wrong with some friendly incest, bro"
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2014
- Messages
- 15,268
Looks like Malcom to them will be done soon, Sanchez will move before next game.
Is he the one in the middle?
Looks like Malcom to them will be done soon, Sanchez will move before next game.
Looks like Malcom to them will be done soon, Sanchez will move before next game.
It’s because to call them a money club is pretty hypocritical when we were able to buy way beyond most of our competitors needs when we were the dominant club.
We’ve been a money club for a far longer period than they have.
Difference being how that money has been earned.It’s because to call them a money club is pretty hypocritical when we were able to buy way beyond most of our competitors needs when we were the dominant club.
We’ve been a money club for a far longer period than they have.
That comment is based on my observation whenever I watched Arsenal games where Sanchez played, not a big sample granted, maybe around 6 or 7 games.
That’s because high profile swap deals never happenA key point to be noted though: the talk of Mikhitaryan going the other way has died down...
Multiple sources have reported that we've offered a vastly better overall package then city.There's nothing to suggest that our personal terms (ie money) are better than City's. It's just that city don't want to match Arsenals asking price.
Calling a team after the city they're from reminds me of PES, 'Manchester Red' etc. Have you never heard of Notts County? One of the oldest official football teams. Gave Juventus their kit.
That would be a very exciting transfer if it were to happen, but where would it leave Martial and Rashford?
I genuinely can't believe City's position can change so drastically in a matter of months. How do you go from sanctioning a £60m bid in the summer to refusing to budge on £20m in the winter?
They spent £26m on a back-up full back in the summer and now they're willing to let a player of Sanchez's ilk sign for a rival because they deem £35m to be too much for him? Either this isn't the whole story or they are incredibly stupid.
It’s because to call them a money club is pretty hypocritical when we were able to buy way beyond most of our competitors needs when we were the dominant club.
We’ve been a money club for a far longer period than they have.
5 feet 6 inches i think.Jesus he's tiny. Looks like a school child.
Shocking sudden absence of City posters on this thread.
Not at all, Lukaku would stay up top. Sanchez would likely play behind him or as a nominal RW, essentially taking Mkhitaryans place. Or who knows, maybe we will play him ahead of Rashford and Martial at LW. Regardless, he would make us a hell of a lot better.
Looks like Malcom to them will be done soon, Sanchez will move before next game.
They're 15 points ahead in the league, one foot in one domestic final, looking guns all loaded for the rest of the season, and are possibly working on other younger targets about which they don't wish to speak publicly.
It’s because to call them a money club is pretty hypocritical when we were able to buy way beyond most of our competitors needs when we were the dominant club.
We’ve been a money club for a far longer period than they have.
We have a back up fullback that cost us 32mil, Young cost 27mil and was considered a squad player for the longest time.I think you also need to look back at our transfer record and more importantly, the context as well. Yes we spent a lot on certain players, but they were vital cogs of a machine that was comprised of homegrown players, and shrewd purchases, who cost the square root of feck all, even in those days. Never has there been a time until now, where clubs are for example, spending £30m on a back up fullback like City have done, and you can't say it's because of the inflation caused by the Neymar deal because City had already done all their business before that point.
Whenever County and Juve play (in a friendly, obviously), Juventus always play in their away kit even if they are at home as a mark of respect.I was just being lazy. Heard of Notts County. Not sure about Juventus though.
All them clueless journalists on Sunday Supplement this morning still saying he's still joining City. feck off you Pep ass lickers.
Goonersworld said:Get the fukin pitchforks out. Cant believe this old twat is about to let this guy go to united. It was disgusting enough with RVP and he gives them more reasons for half of their fanbases to mock us.
Complete and utter rubbish management. Anyone who calls this shit hole of a club, a 'big' club deserves a bollocking. Even fukin Liverpool who've spent years on the doldrums are splashing out cash on quality like it's nobody's business.
There is a protest march happening next Saturday 20th at 2pm, starting from the Marble Halls. Be there.
We have a back up fullback that cost us 32mil, Young cost 27mil and was considered a squad player for the longest time.
People mock them spending a 100 mil on two fullbacks but in the way Pep plays fullbacks are a very important part of the system. He relies on them so 50mil for two very important parts of his team doesn’t seem that much.
Reports are we are supposedly interested in Sandro at 65 mil and The Napoli guy now has a 75mil buyout.
Arsene Wenger, Mr Popularity:
We paid for that success tho. We certainly sustained it with success and even made our wallet bigger due to it but we paid to put ourselves in that position.I reckon we will have this one wrapped up by tomorrow morning and he will be at Old Trafford tomorrow evening.
United have money because of success. City have success because of money. Period.
We paid for that success tho. We certainly sustained it with success and even made our wallet bigger due to it but we paid to put ourselves in that position.
I'm surprised you're going that far when there's 'cocks out'Time for the removal of my penis.
And SAF wouldn’t even sell RM a virus.What surprise me the most if this deal does go through and Sanchez joins United, is the fact that Wenger has actually sold another player too United. I recall him saying that he would never sell another player to United after RVP deal.
Could always be that City don’t want to pay more as there are apparently FFP restrictions, and they can only do so much ‘creative accounting’