Already gave the reasoning in this post: https://www.redcafe.net/threads/ale...-25m-for-sanchez.435324/page-10#post-21976908
But I see everyone's point. Should've said it's obviously a much clearer decision now than it was then.
- Status
But I see everyone's point. Should've said it's obviously a much clearer decision now than it was then.
Maybe I've missed something but I haven't seen anybody say this is from Arsenal?
If that's the case then United should just offer 35m - it would be worth it to get Sanchez for the CL campagin AND get one over City.
sees disappointment in your futureHe is 29 and seems to be on the decline so don't want!!
He played right wing for Udinese and Barcelona. Let's not make it seem like he'd be a deer in headlights when put on the right wing. And he won't stay in the right wing, he'd end up coming more central.
Ah, the great season of heartbreak and tears. Can't say I've missed this.
"Watch and learn how Michail beats his marker, Alexis,".
I think United is the better move for everyone. City don’t need him.
Just to remind everyone, Sanchez stayed with Arsenal despite not having a donkey's chance of winning the league. He has also won the Copa America twice with Chile. This could very well be his last move and he wants some big money for it. The biggest honour for a South American is to win the World cup, followed by the Copa America, so its possible that the league trophy is not his number one priority.
City are on a budget?
It's like Park all over again. Oh he's not a winger/wide player, he plays through the middle for PSV blahblah.
That was a long time ago
He either plays left side at the expense of Martial/Rashford or as a number 10 behind Lukaku
Lads, its city. He will choose them.
Just using our name to speed up negotiations and the transfer.
Just using our name to speed up negotiations and the transfer.
How does he seem to be on the decline? he clearly doesn't give a feck at Arsenal anymore.
At the very least we seem to be active in the market which is a good thing
They must have spent half a billion on defence only. And not even 1 tank to show for it.
That's another £10k a week on his City wage then.
Like I said, he wants to be paid like a free agent, even if he makes his move now. That´s why Bayern stopped their pursuit. The hold-up is probably him, not necessarily Arsenal and City. That of course would give United a chance to hijack the deal, if it´s all about the money.
He’s never coming here. Everything will have been agreed with City since the summe. Probably looking for an extra couple of mil signing bonusHa ha. Arsenal probably leaked this to get City to pay up!
He's guaranteed a PL title at the end of the season, no way he's coming to us.
He's guaranteed a PL title at the end of the season, no way he's coming to us.
So? All of our attacking plays comes from the left anyway. Doesn't hurt to have more players operating there at the same time as our right wing is a minefield.
Thats that then everyone good game.
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...ks-transfer-frenzy-with-twitter-10391491.html
Just a reminder of when United were linked to Benteke to force Liverpool to up their bid and buy him.
I do not believe this Alexis news is any different.
Agents doing what agents do. I will be utterly amazed if Alexis ends up at United. Even though I would love it to happen.
Just a reminder of when United were linked to Benteke to force Liverpool to up their bid and buy him.
I do not believe this Alexis news is any different.
Agents doing what agents do. I will be utterly amazed if Alexis ends up at United. Even though I would love it to happen.
I think i might wet myself if this happens. Imagine if we sign ozil too!
Ha, ok then.
Literally the only edge City have over us is that they can all but guarantee him a league title this season. We are equal in everything else + have heeeshtory, if that matters nowadays.
Mourinho masterstroke IF he signs Sanchez AND Ozil this month, ensures Arsenal will absolutely not be a threat to the top 4!
I suppose you are joking, but he does rely hugely on his athleticism imo sooooo I would say its quite a big risk.... unlike the assist maestro Ozil who has a bit of the Roger Federers about him
Could be true what you are saying but imo if City feel that they can lose him they'll dish out whatever is needed anyway, it's not like they're anyhow constrained money wise. That's why I think it's his agent's play just to get City to pay up.
If we're to put up mkhi for transfer, I suppose we'd ask for 20-25m. Which is exactly the amount Arsenal are quoting for Alexis
Wenger would be mad to do that. Better to let one go on a free in the summer even if messes up his transfer scorecard.
The difference is that Benteke isnt good enough to demand a high price on his own; so he has to use agents to influence clubs.
Sanchez doesn't need his agent to do any of this. Just tell the club that you'll have to cough up or you'll miss out on my quality.
RVP part 2.
Where sanchez wants to go is irrelevant to your question, You asked why we'd let mikhi go to arsenal instead of flogging him abroad.
Regardless of whether sanchez wants to come to us or not, To have any chance of signing him this month we would have to offer arsenal sumthing theyre happy with to let him go. If the reports are true and that somthings mikhi, then that would probably be the reason we'd let him go there instead of abroad.
Great news for us, either this is true and we hopefully pip city to him or its fake which leads to city paying through the nose unnecessarily, either way suits us fine.
Wenger's feud with Mourinho could be a major roadblock. But at the same time, Sanchez was managed by pep for three seasons and didn't really became world class with him, so he might feel that working with Mourinho could improve him more, who knows. Also, he is more likely to be guaranteed playing time at United, with his only real competition being Lukaku than at City with Jesus Sterling and Sane on fire.
Feels like whenever we're linked with anybody people come out the woodwork to claim they're actually shit
- Status