thepolice123
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2008
- Messages
- 12,260
Their scouting team played a blinder with this one. Offers not only similar qualities to Henderson but also superior ball-playing abilities.
Brighton's scouting you mean...
But yeah, how that fee thing happened is anyones guess!
Their scouting team played a blinder with this one. Offers not only similar qualities to Henderson but also superior ball-playing abilities.
AgreedFeck him
Very good player, but the love-in is irritating. It is a United forum after all.Love the gritty little fecker, skillfull, yet always delivering what the game needs time and again, specially clever and focus if it's an important/big one.
He also really connects with what the fans need of a player representing them and he loves that responsability.
hahaha, touche I get it.. I'm not a United fan, I just post in the forum, I'm struggling with the idea that he could be in Boca right now if we managed better our affairsVery good player, but the love-in is irritating. It is a United forum after all.
He could even have been at United right now if we had not moved for Mount.hahaha, touche I get it.. I'm not a United fan, I just post in the forum, I'm struggling with the idea that he could be in Boca right now if we managed better our affairs
He could even have been at United right now if we had not moved for Mount.
Yeah, we were definitely in the conversation. Perhaps Liverpool were genuinely his first choice. I'm a bit unsure on the specifics.Was there ever even a rumour? I can't recall it.
Yeah, we were definitely in the conversation. Perhaps Liverpool were genuinely his first choice. I'm a bit unsure on the specifics.
Brighton quoted us double the fee than they gave to Liverpool. Just like wolves did with Jota to Liverpool for 2 million up front
Typical fecking Scotsmani don’t watch much of liverpool, but when i do, i can guarantee half of that time is watching him roll around on the floor like a bish.
Mac Allister had a release clause...we activated it.Brighton quoted us double the fee than they gave to Liverpool. Just like wolves did with Jota to Liverpool for 2 million up front
No one reputable reported that, care to provide a source? Also curious as to when Utd were quoted double the price.Yes, but that was added specifically for Liverpool when he signed a new contract with Brighton the summer before he left them.
No one reputable reported that, care to provide a source? Also curious as to when Utd were quoted double the price.
Not what I asked for. I know we activated his release clause, I pointed that out to you already.With rumours of any transfer costing in the region of £70 million as recently as two weeks ago, the reveal has shocked many.
Mac Allister's £35m release clause
Romano has taken to Twitter to announce that Mac Allister will be moving to Merseyside for £35 million. In terms of the inflated market in football, this must be seen as a bargain.
According to The Athletic, Mac Allister's contract contains a clause that was designed to "help facilitate a move".
https://theathletic.com/4494603/2023/05/08/chelsea-manager-pochettino-mac-allister-transfer/
Not what I asked for. I know we activated his release clause, I pointed that out to you already.
I'm asking a) how was it exclusive to Liverpool and b) when were Utd quoted double the price?
If Utd listened to Brighton quoting them double the release clause amount and didn't pursue it further, more fool you. Almost definitely didn't happen though.
No, we signed Mount for £55m because ETH had worked with him before and we were signing players on that silly basis.Brighton quoted us double the fee than they gave to Liverpool. Just like wolves did with Jota to Liverpool for 2 million up front
Wrong. Brighton never quote transfer valuations. That's THE key part of their transfer strategy. And McAllister didn’t have a release clause in his contract but he did have an agreement with Tony Bloom to let him move for a mutually agreed valuation. Despite what you might have read the £35m fee is the base valuation. There are additional clauses totalling a further £20m.Brighton quoted us double the fee than they gave to Liverpool. Just like wolves did with Jota to Liverpool for 2 million up front
Wrong. Brighton never quote transfer valuations. That's THE key part of their transfer strategy. And McAllister didn’t have a release clause in his contract but he did have an agreement with Tony Bloom to let him move for a mutually agreed valuation. Despite what you might have read the £35m fee is the base valuation. There are additional clauses totalling a further £20m.
Thanks for the clarification. I've been taken in by journalists writing speculative stuff then.
Also, the pro-scouse journalists at the time did their usual thing of claiming the fee was the only amount that would be paid, no add ons mentioned.
Anyway, as good as player as he is, I also think he's one of the biggest injury faking cheats in the league. Pretends his face has been injured when it was his shoulder. Can't stand the cnut to be honest
Old, yet cool vid:
Think I'll pass on watching that one.
He's a weird player to be fanboying about.Think I'll pass on watching that one.
You sound fecking delusional.It's pretty clear the player wanted Liverpool and his agent would've made sure Liverpool knew that and knew the release clause.
I'm not engaging with this any further. Smug Liverpool fans are not my thing.
It's pretty clear the player wanted Liverpool and his agent would've made sure Liverpool knew that and knew the release clause.
I'm not engaging with this any further. Smug Liverpool fans are not my thing.
He's a weird player to be fanboying about.