He has been fine, nothing spectacular or eccentric. Much better defensively than I expected as well.
We have two good left backs now, so we can afford to rest Shaw whenever we need to.
Yeah, haven't seen him beaten too many times on the ground, and wins most of his headers too. Only worry in his defensive game so far is his defending in the box which is an admirable quality of Shaw's.I think he’s done really well, given he came from a different league, had no pre-season with us, got Covid and had a really disrupted start to the season.
in terms of performance, he’s been as expected. A good squad option and competition to Shaw. I didn’t expect him to come in and be an upgrade on Shaw, so my expectations weren’t as high as some.
Obviously it's early days, but I really don't understand why we didn't go for Tagliafico. Brilliant in the air and going forward and was available at a readonable priceHe's performing about as well as you'd expect a back up left back who just arrived from the continent to be performing... As others have said, still early days and plenty of time to improve.
He does seem to be remarkabley poor in the air though... Which is annoying when you're other full back has the aerial presence of a badger.
True, it's good to have options and having him means that we can use Shaw at CB when we have to.He has been fine, nothing spectacular or eccentric. Much better defensively than I expected as well.
We have two good left backs now, so we can afford to rest Shaw whenever we need to.
Just because he crosses a lot doesn't mean he's much more progressive than Shaw.This is the only thing I could think constructive about his performances so far. He hardly won an aerial duel at the end, not that anyone else did either, but you're right - teams will target that eventually.
His passing is so much more progressive than Shaw's ever has been.
I don't think that, otherwise I would have said he crosses a lot. You can see it in the stats as well https://fbref.com/en/squads/19538871/Manchester-United-Stats#all_stats_passing_10728Just because he crosses a lot doesn't mean he's much more progressive than Shaw.
Shaw's 1-2 passing with Rashford and Pogba which unlocked space for Rashford and Pogba was a huge part of our attacking in seasons before and stats says it's not progressive.I don't think that, otherwise I would have said he crosses a lot. You can see it in the stats as well https://fbref.com/en/squads/19538871/Manchester-United-Stats#all_stats_passing_10728
I don't disagree with that either. 1-2s are about the only way Shaw goes forward, he also slows play down a lot as well. He regularly doesn't attempt line breaking passes, or first time passes and his crossing is poor. Things that Telles is better at and does more than Shaw.Shaw's 1-2 passing with Rashford and Pogba which unlocked space for Rashford and Pogba was a huge part of our attacking in seasons before and stats says it's not progressive.
He was. That’s been the norm really. The odd good cross and that’s about it.No comments on his performance today?
Thought he was pretty poor.
No comments on his performance today?
Thought he was pretty poor.
understudy/ squad left back. Doing as expected.
Pretty much. He’s a good, solid player to have around the squad. We’ll get some goals out of his crossing, too.
He’s a good, experienced player. Not top class, but that’s not what we need. We needed an actual left back capable of playing in order to rest Shaw and cover for him when injured.
Shaw is not that popular with fans, so think a lot thought Telles would be his replacement, and had expectations that were too high.
Thought he was average. One bad decision that let Coleman in, but alright otherwise.No comments on his performance today?
Thought he was pretty poor.