Sky1981
Fending off the urge
They should rename the club to paris san paolo, or brazil san germaint
He's so out of Juventus.On the bench against Inter tonight
If we are keeping both Young and Shaw then LB can't be looked at as a problem position. Either one of them isn't good enough or as I suspect we just need to give both more time especially when you look at how well both have been doing in that position lately.
If we are keeping both Young and Shaw then LB can't be looked at as a problem position. Either one of them isn't good enough or as I suspect we just need to give both more time especially when you look at how well both have been doing in that position lately.
How is he defensively?
How is he defensively?
I think he's probably the best defensively out of all the 'modern' left backsNot the best, like most of the modern, in vogue, full-backs. The commentator today said that his replacement Asamoah is much better defensively, but worse going forward. Not sure what Mourinho wants the most, probably someone who is strong and tactically astute, as well as having a great machine and a good cross on him.
He’ll fit right in then.On the bench against Inter tonight
Not the best, like most of the modern, in vogue, full-backs. The commentator today said that his replacement Asamoah is much better defensively, but worse going forward. Not sure what Mourinho wants the most, probably someone who is strong and tactically astute, as well as having a great machine and a good cross on him.
Young can be backup for both fullback spots and wings, luke Shaw could be backup to sandro
Shaw can’t stay fit to string enough games together to get fully fit or show/fulfil his potential whilst Young is a 33 year old winger suddenly turned full back, I’d say left back IS a problem position even if Young has put a few games together that have been very good.
Alex Sandro is without question one of the top 5 left backs in the world, almost certainly one of the top 3 and arguably the all round best so is a HUGE upgrade on what we have at the club and if we can get him for £50 million then we should without question.
Shaw. He's been here long enough now. He'd have established himself by now if he was going to.For us to sign him somebody has to leave in Jan, we don't need that much back up. Personally I'd if Shaw like to see Young and Shaw left to fight for the spot however if Sandro comes in somebody has to leave.
Darmian can leave. Young can play right back.For us to sign him somebody has to leave in Jan, we don't need that much back up. Personally I'd if Shaw like to see Young and Shaw left to fight for the spot however if Sandro comes in somebody has to leave.
For us to sign him somebody has to leave in Jan, we don't need that much back up. Personally I'd if Shaw like to see Young and Shaw left to fight for the spot however if Sandro comes in somebody has to leave.
He is so out of juve. We need to exploit this. We can get him cheaper than rose and he is better player than rose( not saying that rose is bad).
Cheaper than Rose? They turned down nearly £60m from Chelsea, and they are notorious for being stingy.
They don't much fancy us either after the Pogba saga.
Yes, but then sandro for first team player, was happy, etc...Cheaper than Rose? They turned down nearly £60m from Chelsea, and they are notorious for being stingy.
They don't much fancy us either after the Pogba saga.
Why are Juve willing to get rid in Jan?
our policy which the management has repeated a thousand times is "if the player asks to leave we won't stand in their way"He wants to leave apparently. Whether or not Juve would let him leave is another quetsion though.
The policy is "if a player wants to leave we'll let him leave if we think it's advantageous for us"our policy which the management has repeated a thousand times is "if the player asks to leave we won't stand in their way"
So it's more than likely he will be sold by the time Summer comes around
Seems fitting since Chelsea steal majority of our signings.
Don't really understand all this Chelsea talk. Are they not completely satisfied with Marcos Alonso?
I remember hearing from Castles that Conte actually wanted/wants Sandro to play as a LCB and keep Alonso as a LWB.Don't really understand all this Chelsea talk. Are they not completely satisfied with Marcos Alonso?
I think Chelsea want some competition at LWB. Alonso was great last season and started well this season but has gone off the boil since and is looking a bit tired. If they could get Sandro I suspect Alonso would act as cover. Chelsea are OK at LCB. Luiz will comeback if required.I remember hearing from Castles that Conte actually wanted/wants Sandro to play as a LCB and keep Alonso as a LWB.
I remember hearing from Castles that Conte actually wanted/wants Sandro to play as a LCB and keep Alonso as a LWB.
Yeah that's what I would presume as well. Chelsea don't really have cover for LWB, bar Zappacosta (who is better on the right side) and Azpilicueta (who virtually covers every defensive position).I think Chelsea want some competition at LWB. Alonso was great last season and started well this season but has gone off the boil since and is looking a bit tired. If they could get Sandro I suspect Alonso would act as cover. Chelsea are OK at LCB. Luiz will comeback if required.
I don't think Sandro would struggle in that position, as he has similar attributes to Alaba. Though, his attacking instincts would be limited playing there.I really doubt Sandro could play this role from what ive seen and it would completely waste his attacking ability.
Thats what I thought, was under the impression he's been brilliant and signing a right sided defender was of greater importance.
I have seen very little on Sandro but if he's Mourhino's first choice and we sign him then I'd be delighted as we're desperately short in that area. Would Juve be interested in Darmian?
Don't really understand all this Chelsea talk. Are they not completely satisfied with Marcos Alonso?