Was he injured or just taken off for tactical reasons/having a quiet game?
Tactical imo. Not a good game but he's so young and inexperienced I'm surprised so many call him out so early in his career when he's also done some great things.Was he injured or just taken off for tactical reasons/having a quiet game?
Ever? He’s 18.I think his current playing style suits being an impact sub, not sure if he has enough to his game to ever become a regular starter.
You do know he is 18? Seems incredibly harshI think his current playing style suits being an impact sub, not sure if he has enough to his game to ever become a regular starter.
He was a weak link defensively, big learning curve today. coming on as sub there is no pressure on himWas he injured or just taken off for tactical reasons/having a quiet game?
He has enough to his game to become a truly top class player. He's 18 and an excellent impact sub, gets into great positions regularly, creates great chances for himself and others, always a threat with his pace and dribbling... Time will tell how he progresses, but as an 18 year old he is excellent. Definitely more suited to being an impact sub right now but that's fine.I think his current playing style suits being an impact sub, not sure if he has enough to his game to ever become a regular starter.
IMO he only got subbed off because other areas of the side weren’t working and we were fortunate to be in front. It was a tactical master stroke to take him off.
Ever? He’s 18.
Should be used as an impact sub until he grows into his body a bit.
One thing that people aren't mentioning is both games sancho has looked good coming off the bench, he was playing in a central position.
I think once Antony is back our best lineup would be Fernandes out on the left with sancho no10 and Garnacho off the bench.
Tactical imo. Not a good game but he's so young and inexperienced I'm surprised so many call him out so early in his career when he's also done some great things.
'Tis the way I guess.
He was a big issue in the first half with how easily Leicester were getting down our left hand side.
But he's 18, he'll learn.
if he was that good today then why did EtH pull him off at HT??? don't tell me i'm talking rubbish or don't know football
if he was that good today then why did EtH pull him off at HT??? don't tell me i'm talking rubbish or don't know football
Like many young players, Garanacho's biggest weakness seems to be knowing what to do when he doesn't have the ball. Today his body positioning was when Leicester was in possession was all wrong. He kept turning his back on his RB and getting burnt down the flanks. This was putting Shaw in positions where they were able to attack 2 vs 1. He needs to open his body up so he can see the play and see his man. With that being said, he's young and still learning. We have seen several times how dangerous he can be in the attacking 3rd. The rest of his game will come, and the best way to learn is to play. He probably wasn't happy about being subbed at half time today, but when the coaching staff go over video of his game today, I'm sure he will see why and learn from it...
To be fair, he has had several games where he has tracked back successfully, but yesterday wasn't one of them.
As he matures, he will gradually start to get into better defensive positions automatically, as he learns his trade, but at the moment he is having to try to bring everything together during a game and he will have moments where he switches off.
To be fair, he has had several games where he has tracked back successfully, but yesterday wasn't one of them.
As he matures, he will gradually start to get into better defensive positions automatically, as he learns his trade, but at the moment he is having to try to bring everything together during a game and he will have moments where he switches off.
He's 18. In his adolescent mind he's the centre of the universe probably.I noticed he did a mini-Ronaldo sulk ie didn't celebrate when Rashford scored his 1st, and when Marcus didn't square the ball to him.
i guess b/c he scored the second goal against Leeds in the 29 minutes he played that he's been impressive lately....congrats on the goal b/c it was a big goal at the time to settle the match but he's been absent on the pitch recently not really getting on the ball and not tracking defensively. I know he's young and consistency will be an issue but given our lack of attacking options, we need him to put in 7 out of 10 performances.Did someone say he was good? He had an awful time with his positioning and defensive work.
The thing is, I'm not questioning his work rate and I don't think he is against doing his defensive work. I've seen him do it before too. Yesterday it was about his positioning. He was turning his back on his man and by the time he realized it, he was already gone...