You couldn't make this shit up. He's statistically the second best midfielder in Europe during the calendar year of 2012. Why is he not considered as highly as he performs?
First of all you won't really see many of the studious fans who understand how we play saying this. They usually raise a minor concern about Carrick and get shouted at for being a hater and hating on him but most of the time when talking about the defensive side of his game they are raising genuine concerns.
Don't get me wrong I think when Carrick this season has played in the midfield role he has genuinely been more mobile and more clinical in the attacking side of his game, he's even starting to read and adapt with Cleverley but when it comes to doing his defensive duties such as closing play, tracking runners and making tackles/interceptions this season he has been extremely sub par. A lot of the looseness of the defence has come this season from the lack of protection he's offering the central defenders.
This gentle analysis can often be met with disdain by people who appreciate Carrick's game but for me, it is a genuine problem and has been offset by his ability in attack and Fergie's reluctance to play with a limited ball winning defensive midfielder in the central position. Which is fair enough - this season for what it is worth Carrick has been so solid and clinical in attack it hasn't really mattered.
Words like 'average', 'shite', 'useless' and the like can get lost very easily on people who can't see through the meat of the sandwich when it comes to football. They see him not making tackles and crunching players, not tracking runners and instantly think he's shite. They see him not taking on opponents and not using the ball at feet to open play but rather opting for a 'safe' pass and say he's frustrating.
Carrick can certainly be more adventurous but he's neither playing an all out attacking midfield role nor an all out limited defensive midfield role. That is where most of the hatred lies. It's hard to link and string attacks as well as protect and snuff out the opposition in defence. You have to be quick, strong and hungry to go in hard on your opposition (unbreakable) and combine that with razor sharp attacking passing and movement on and off the ball. You'd be hard pressed trying to list 5 midfielders in the world who are a 8.5+ in defensive midfield and a 8.5+ in attack. You can't have a huge mighty sword then go to battle wearing just underwear. Same as you can't wear a massive impenetrable suit of armor and fight with a letter opener.
I usually just put my 2c in with these 'types' and say 'he could do a little bit more in defense to help the back four but it would probably effect his attacking game' and leave it at that. If they keep harping on about how shite he is they are usually too far gone to try and convince that he is an important aspect of our midfield for whatever strengths and weaknesses that he brings to the table.