RopersReturn
Full Member
At £17/18M, he’ll do the job for now at least. We just can’t continue relying on the limited midfield we have.
“ Lindelof, Elanga, DVB, Bailey, Henderson and AWB should all have been sold to finance our summer spending. Best part of 150m there and none of them would be missed.”
Absolutely correct and goes without saying.
Well, thank feck for that.
I could have told him that, though.
And I'm an idiot who usually watches our games in a state of mild to severe inebriation.
Definitely, forgot about ‘Chong’!Throw Chong in there along with Dalot.
Definitely, forgot about ‘Chong’!
Exactly. Gives us depth and means we wouldn’t have to play mctominay and Fred together. Rabiot on his own though will be a disaster and they’ll be more riots outside old Trafford.Rabiot plus another. Makes sense in that case.
I'll be honest, I thought that he could do it, though his ability to tackle is questionable. So for me it's a bit disappointing but it makes sense. Now the interesting part is if he also decided to not trust McTominay which seems to be the message sent to media, in that case Rabiot or someone with that profile make sense, though I would prefer Bennacer or if we want a bigger body, Kondogbia.
Before the second half of last season he was a squad player but gained a starting spot. Now I don't know how Simeone will use him this season.Great shout. He's impressed me in our games against Atletico, definitely a player flying under the radar.
Is he a starter there? I suspect he wouldn't want to leave them for us right now though.
We're short in numbers in midfield so letting DVB go wouldn't be wise and I think he could still work out.“ Lindelof, Elanga, DVB, Bailey, Henderson and AWB should all have been sold to finance our summer spending. Best part of 150m there and none of them would be missed.”
Absolutely correct and goes without saying.
Message in the sense of us trying to sign a mid or ETH said something in that sense?I'll be honest, I thought that he could do it, though his ability to tackle is questionable. So for me it's a bit disappointing but it makes sense. Now the interesting part is if he also decided to not trust McTominay which seems to be the message sent to media, in that case Rabiot or someone with that profile make sense, though I would prefer Bennacer or if we want a bigger body, Kondogbia.
Message in the sense of us trying to sign a mid or ETH said something in that sense?
Great shout. He's impressed me in our games against Atletico, definitely a player flying under the radar.
Is he a starter there? I suspect he wouldn't want to leave them for us right now though.
I'll be honest, I thought that he could do it, though his ability to tackle is questionable. So for me it's a bit disappointing but it makes sense. Now the interesting part is if he also decided to not trust McTominay which seems to be the message sent to media, in that case Rabiot or someone with that profile make sense, though I would prefer Bennacer or if we want a bigger body, Kondogbia.
Nor should he be. Fred does his best work much further up the pitch.It's not strange when you consider that he replaced the connector with an other connector. It was a big issue for us and it was the correct move. It seems that Fred isn't relied on as the defensive box to box.
Nor should he be. Fred does his best work much further up the pitch.
ETH won't want 2 x defensive players as his pair which is why I think Fred can work, albeit he's not ideal. He's best where Carrick/Ragnick used him and where he plays for Brasil; post Ole sacking he played 19 games in the PL (and that's including all sub appearances) and got 3 goals, 5 assists in a dysfunctional attacking team. That's him being directly involved in 25% of all our goals during that time. If we keep playing him deep he's cack but he's actually good as a CM - our issue is gettign Rashford/Sancho more involved and sorting out the deepest lying CM.Thedefensivebox to box is the one playing higher in that system.
ETH won't want 2 x defensive players as his pair which is why I think Fred can work, albeit he's not ideal. He's best where Carrick/Rangnick used him and where he plays for Brasil; post Ole sacking he played 19 games in the PL (and that's including all sub appearances) and got 3 goals, 5 assists in a dysfunctional attacking team. That's him being directly involved in 25% of all our goals during that time. If we keep playing him deep he's cack but he's actually good as a CM - our issue is gettign Rashford/Sancho more involved and sorting out the deepest lying CM.
I can see Rabiot competing with Fred next season but he'll be a stop gap in De Jong's role in my opinion if he comes now. It's not ideal but it's better than what he have.
I read his comments as the opposite, that the connector is a more limited player whose job is to link the defence with the midfield and do the general hard yards offensively/defensively. Fred = Schone in that regard. I don't think he's currently operating with a player in De Jong's role because we don't have one who can play it - Eriksen is best current option but I feel he will be pressed too easily, VDB could fill in but he's not got the passing range.What he describes as a connector isn't a defensive player, that's De Jong or whoever replaces him such as Eriksen during the second half of the last game. The other player is a defensive box to box. He may change things but that's what he has done with us and when he had De Jong and Schone.
I read his comments as the opposite, that the connector is a more limited player whose job is to link the defence with the midfield and do the general hard yards offensively/defensively. Fred = Schone in that regard. I don't think he's currently operating with a player in De Jong's role because we don't have one who can play it - Eriksen is best current option but I feel he will be pressed too easily, VDB could fill in but he's not got the passing range.
Is that just your interpretation though? I haven't seen ETH define the role outside of linking defence/midfield and De Jong did a lot more than that at Ajax.The connector isn't a limited player, he is the one in charge of the transition, that links everything up in possession. Fred should be Schone for us but we have no one to play the more technical role, outside of Eriksen.
Rabiot plus another. Makes sense in that case.
Not for me, Clive.What do we think about Kean?
…per week?
Mbappe is on around £1m/week. Maybe if you spread the signing bonus out over the life of the contract, it’s around £1.5m/week or £800k/week after tax, but he’s not earning that much just on his salary.According to Capology yes
Exactly. Gives us depth and means we wouldn’t have to play mctominay and Fred together. Rabiot on his own though will be a disaster and they’ll be more riots outside old Trafford.
Unbelievable Jeff.
Didn’t realise rabiot was at city in his youth years. They obviously didn’t think much of him if they let him go. But saying that Chelsea let go of a lot of talent when they was younger aswell. It’s mixed feelings for this signing to be honest… for one of the biggest clubs in the world we shouldn’t be settling for 2nd 3rd or 4th choice targets, that’s if he even was a target because we weren’t even being linked with him up until we made the offer for him. Was all about de Jong, and neves or tielemans being the other targets. Sounds like a desperate and panic buy to me.
Suppose everyone deserves a chance. He could surprise us all. Least it’s only like 15m signing and not a really expensive one. The one thing that worry’s me though is he’s meant to have bad attitude. Bit like pogba and we don’t want that again after getting rid of a couple like that.IF it happens will give him a chance
Is that just your interpretation though? I haven't seen ETH define the role outside of linking defence/midfield and De Jong did a lot more than that at Ajax.
Don't think we'd get 50m for them, let alone 150m.“ Lindelof, Elanga, DVB, Bailey, Henderson and AWB should all have been sold to finance our summer spending. Best part of 150m there and none of them would be missed.”
Absolutely correct and goes without saying.