My bad, @JohnnyLaw Thanks for the vid.
No problem mate.
My bad, @JohnnyLaw Thanks for the vid.
I'm afraid so. That may balance out a little as he matures, though.I think he's a Fergie type of player, give him free reign and he can do magic. Ask him to plug away at a boring formula, like with LVG, and he becomes average.
All the highlights videos show his very good technique and ability but he has undoubtedly played against poor opposition. They're giving him plenty of time for the first touch/movement (which sets up everything else) compared to when he was playing with us, although it's most likely because he's finding more space dropping deeper and going wide as oppossed to that no.10/2nd striker business with LVG.
That's definitely noticeable in the St Pauli and to some extent the Krasnodar videos, but I'm seeing no evidence of it against Hannover or Leverkusen. Particularly in the latter, he's having to work very hard to find any space at all, and is almost exclusively getting the ball with an opponent already up against his back.
The two Bundesliga videos look pretty close to what he's experienced and can expect in a lot of PL matches.
This is just strange considering Januzaj had one of the more impressive starts to his United career as an 18 year old. The October that he had against Sunderland, Southampton, Norwich, etc... were something that Martial didn't even do, goals aside. And one of our worst outfield players every time in the last 2 seasons? No where near true with Moyes. It was only last season that he had a really bad season in very few minutes btw.No, his main weakness was his terrible judgment. He would either lose the ball making a stupid attempt to beat 3 defenders or take terrible attempts on goal, breaking up what few attacks we were able to muster up. He was one of our worst outfield players everytime he has played for us in the last 2 seasons.
His pathetic clearance of a clear goal opportunity for Kagawa in that clip reminds me why he is on loan and not playing for us. Compare to other youngsters like Martial and Depay and how they have taken their positions by storm, and frankly, patience for Januzaj is running low.
This is all hypothetical but what if he didn't come back a better player after being loaned out to a weaker side? Januzaj's main weaknesses are his dribbling and decision making, both of which make him an isolated figure and it doesn't look good, but I feel a weaker side would rely far too heavily on his individual brilliance and I doubt he would make that much of an improvement . Which almost makes a loan move redundant in that regard. At Borussia Dortmund, he has to rely less on his dribbling and make decisions quickly and he's playing under Tuchel, who prefers a good mixture of possession-based and counter-attacking football. Which benefits both parties more IMO.He's getting more game time there than he would be with us. The decision to loan him out is justified already, I think. Whether Dortmund was the best destination remains to be seen. Would rather he'd gone to a weaker side where he'd play even more, tbh.
That's an interesting idea. I do think if the league level was still high (like the Bundesliga) then it wouldn't be that much of an issue, unless you mean specifically for playing under LVG. If he can be good enough for a weaker side to be happy to rely on him to be their match-winner week in week out, I think that would be a significant step up already.This is all hypothetical but what if he didn't come back a better player after being loaned out to a weaker side? Januzaj's main weaknesses are his dribbling and decision making, both of which make him an isolated figure and it doesn't look good, but I feel a weaker side would rely far too heavily on his individual brilliance and I doubt he would make that much of an improvement . Which almost makes a loan move redundant in that regard. At Borussia Dortmund, he has to rely less on his dribbling and make decisions quickly and he's playing under Tuchel, who prefers a good mixture of possession-based and counter-attacking football. Which benefits both parties more IMO.
This is all hypothetical but what if he didn't come back a better player after being loaned out to a weaker side? Januzaj's main weaknesses are his dribbling and decision making, both of which make him an isolated figure and it doesn't look good, but I feel a weaker side would rely far too heavily on his individual brilliance and I doubt he would make that much of an improvement . Which almost makes a loan move redundant in that regard. At Borussia Dortmund, he has to rely less on his dribbling and make decisions quickly and he's playing under Tuchel, who prefers a good mixture of possession-based and counter-attacking football. Which benefits both parties more IMO.
People keep saying it but how is he getting anymore gametime at Dortmund than he would have at United ?
That's fair. You could see the problems Januzaj had under LvG: struggled physically, was far too much of a dribbler with little end product, decision making was poor, and he probably didn't follow instructions. I didn't think he did too badly this season but obviously LvG thought different.That's an interesting idea. I do think if the league level was still high (like the Bundesliga) then it wouldn't be that much of an issue, unless you mean specifically for playing under LVG. If he can be good enough for a weaker side to be happy to rely on him to be their match-winner week in week out, I think that would be a significant step up already.
If he gets regular game-time at Dortmund and can really learn all those things in the space of a single year, I will be delighted.
Interesting. Thanks for the insight.Based on Tuchel's comments on Adnan so far, I reckon that the main difference between Hofmann and him at this point in time is experience with our brand of football, i.e. the intensity, positional play, defensive work. That's something Adnan should be able to learn quickly and work himself up in the pecking order above Hofmann. Tuchel won't let him start in matches in which he would consider him a potential defensive liability.
Generally, I suspect Tuchel will give Adnan more game time against teams sitting back with a compact defense.
The pre-match presser is tomorrow where Tuchel may give us some clues if he considers starting Adnan against Darmstadt on Sunday.
Even if Reus, Kagawa and Mkhitaryan won't suffer injuries, they'd need a rest from time to time. Therefore, I'm confident Adnan will get a decent amount of game time if he adapts to Tuchel's demands. If I had to guess, I'd say AJ gets subbed on against Darmstadt and starts next Thursday in the Europa League. Against Bayern though, he'll be back on the bench.But even if Adnan does make it over Hoffman, I don't see him starting over reus, shinji and mikhtariyan. That's not too bad though, as Dortmund have many games due to Europa
Based on Tuchel's comments on Adnan so far, I reckon that the main difference between Hofmann and him at this point in time is experience with our brand of football, i.e. the intensity, positional play, defensive work. That's something Adnan should be able to learn quickly and work himself up in the pecking order above Hofmann. Tuchel won't let him start in matches in which he would consider him a potential defensive liability.
Generally, I suspect Tuchel will give Adnan more game time against teams sitting back with a compact defense.
The pre-match presser is tomorrow where Tuchel may give us some clues if he considers starting Adnan against Darmstadt on Sunday.
I fully second your point that Januzaj's decision making is his main weakness.
However: In the first place, I wasn't stating my opinion on Januzaj or Hofmann but what I make of Tuchel's comments on the two since Januzaj arrived, and I haven't referred to long-term prospects of the two players beyond this season.
Although I admit that I don't see in Hofmann what you see. First of all, I'm not too impressed by his decision making either (for example, I recall numerous situations in which he went into senseless dribblings which he lost). Secondly, IMHO four goals in 1.500 minutes aren't too impressive for an attacking midfielder. Okay, he scored the opener against Leverkusen but he also scored the 3rd goal in Munich in spring 2014 against a - at that time - rather toothless Bayern (they had walked the league before and were two goals down in that game).
Assists are nice stats but they contain a huge element of luck: The passing player has next to zero influence if a team mate scores or not. Henrikh Mkhitaryan is a prime example for this fact: In season 14/15 Micky would have already had a close to two-digit number of assists in the first half of the season if Auba, Reus etc had scored his key passes as they did in the second half. Likewise, Reus and Auba would have had a much higher number of assists if Micky had converted a fraction of their key passes. Therefore, assists don't rank too high in my books.
Generally, I find it more difficult to judge upon (attacking) players who mainly get subbed on rather playing from the start, which is the case for Hofmann during his tenure(s) with us. Defenders can be tired, or the opponent opening up at the end to equalize or score the winning goal, making it potentially easier to pass and shoot.
Back to Januzaj. Even if he adapts quickly to our game, I don't think Tuchel will consider him as a natural starter unless Kagawa, Reus, Micky or Auba are injured, have a serious and continuous dip in form, or need a rest; but it is apparent to me that Tuchel appreciates him and his abilities enough to see him already after such a short period of time much closer to Hofmann than I would have expected.
What comments about Hofmann? Did I miss something? I don´t recall Tuchel ever saying something specific about him. .
Let's agree to diasagree on his point then.I disagree, I don´t think he really often goes in senseless dribblings.
My point is that assists are generally largely influenced by luck, more so than scoring, because the passing player is totally reliant on the receiving team mate if he grabs an assist or not. I took Micky as an example to show that this huge luck component applies regardless who's assisting.So you dismiss Hofmann´s most impressive stat by stating that it is reliant on team mates (which is true, but so is scored goals) and then spend a paragraph describing how other Dortmund players should have more assists already, if the chance conversion would be better? The only reason why Hofmann´s number of assists should be seen as less impressive is if it would be inflated by a very strong forward line in terms of finishing. That´s obviously not the case here because both under Klopp and Tuchel chance conversion is far from perfect, some would even call it a weakness. If anything, Hofmann´s number of assists would be deflated and clearly show that he can create very good chances for his team mates to convert.
Again, we don´t know that. All Tuchel has said, is that Januzaj is a definite option both as starter or as sub. This is a statement as open as it gets. It tells us nothing we don´t already know, because he played in both ways already. That´s the kind of answer of someone who does not want to rule anything out. I don´t think Januzaj will play tomorrow, as we will probably play with the best possible formation and then rotate in Greece for the EL.
What in the feck?
Getting a bit too friendly with Reus I see.
Agent Adnan at work folks
Getting a bit too friendly with Reus I see.
Agent Adnan at work folks
What are they doing to our Adnan ?
Getting a bit too friendly with Reus I see.
Agent Adnan at work folks
Nah, looks more as if agents MR11 and PEA17 are on a successful "why don't you stay just a little bit longer" mission ...
Getting a bit too friendly with Reus I see.
Agent Adnan at work folks
That's Reus's hand on his crotch. When you realise that, this becomes very creepy to watch.
Getting a bit too friendly with Reus I see.
Agent Adnan at work folks
Getting a bit too friendly with Reus I see.
Agent Adnan at work folks
Getting a bit too friendly with Reus I see.
Agent Adnan at work folks