Brophs
The One and Only
Would we really be surprised? It'd just be the latest in utterly mindless decisions over the last couple of years.
No chance will he be sold, none at all. We aren't complete idiots.
Go on, please tell me your reasoning behind this?And I don't think Giggs is a good judge of talent, other than the glaringly obvious
There os a very negative perception on the Caf about Giggs in general, may I know why?Go on, please tell me your reasoning behind this?
it is based on the very sound bites i have heard from him, as well as the stupid video they did when he was the manager.Go on, please tell me your reasoning behind this?
In our next cup game I'd live to see him playing behind Rooney as number 10 but likely won't happen.
Where and how would they have played? Welbeck would have just about fumbled with the ball while Keane has regressed badly since his injury.Both Welbeck and Keane could have been useful for us this season, instead we decided to sell them. And now reports (though unconfirmed) on Januzaj leaving.
Sounds about right for a "Post Sir Alex Manchester United".
Firstly I don't think LvG would sell him. That said, however, I am concerned about the way he's been handled this season. A loan with Moyes might not be the worst thing in the world.
LVG has said he's our player and he's not going anywhere.Not sure why we should take words from those tabloids more serious than his.
you can say the same about taking what managers say as 100% trueLVG has said he's our player and he's not going anywhere.Not sure why we should take words from those tabloids more serious than his.
No point in Woodward blocking a loan move. If the manager isn't going to play him, it's best for his development if he goes on loan and gets regular games. I originally hoped he would stay and play but he isn't really playing and he'll end up stagnating at a crucial stage of his development where he should be kicking on. He has real ability.WOODWARD should just overrule LVG if he wants to sell and loan him.
He is on 5 year contract. Makes no sense from club perspective to sell.
We could easily incorporate him in a 4-2-3-1 or a 4-3-3, just play rooney up top on his own. We'd be much better off for it I think. Di maria, rooney, januzaj/mata up top, herrera/mata, Carrick, blind in midfield. Rotate the striker with rooney/rvp and rooney can push back in midfield too depending on form and injuries. Hopefully we switch to a formation like that so we can use him, as the 35-2 is shite regardless.The problem here is that, at the moment, the formations we play don't really allow for him. Not without dropping either a mainstay of the team or a very expensive player like Mata.
No point in Woodward blocking a loan move. If the manager isn't going to play him, it's best for his development if he goes on loan and gets regular games. I originally hoped he would stay and play but he isn't really playing and he'll end up stagnating at a crucial stage of his development where he should be kicking on. He has real ability.
If we somehow revert back to 4 at the back we'll need him as our only other winger who can take people on, so as not to be completely reliant on a diamond system. Would love to see him and di Maria on the wings with 3 actual midfielders (Herrera, Blind and Carrick) with a sole striker in the striker position.
I can see why van Gaal doesn't like him with the way we currently play. It's all about possession, playing the safe pass until we actually lose the ball in very dangerous areas of the pitch, patiently building our play without creating a chance. That's not Januzaj's style and it isn't di Maria's either.