GDaly95
Says he's one of the best posters
This thread is about to become a nightmare
This thread is about to become a nightmare
This thread is about to become a nightmare
You're more than entitled to your opinion, but I think that view is shaped by what fullbacks have been asked to do in the last 5-10 years. Gone are the days when someone like Neville - never the most explosive attacker - would be the archetypal fullback. Maybe the game is truly moving toward flair players at outside back, but I would be shocked if we don't see some regression to the mean, where a fullback's defending is prized as highly as attacking ability.
To your second point: I would consider Lahm as a defender first, who improved in the attack as he got older. Javier Zanetti as well, although he never contributed as much to the attack as many modern defenders. Ashley Cole, from my memory (although it's been a long time since he was relevant, and I only tangentially followed his exploits at Arsenal) started out as a rock solid defender and became more and more of a wing back as he entered his peak.
And every other right back in the league except for TAA!it's a terrible own goal but I'd sooner assess AWB over the course of a season vs a singular game he's had a consistent game to be fair. Still better than Young and Dalot.
Lahm has always been a technical player.
True, no argument there. Still, I'd rather have a defender who might improve his crossing than an attacking fullback who can't defend. Especially if we don't drastically improve our central defense and holding midfield options. Liverpool can only play such sharp counter-attacking football because they are building from a solid defensive base. Their fullbacks can bomb forward with nary a care because they know they've got VVD and co. covering their backs.
The most essential aspect of counter-attacking football is being able to win the ball back efficiently and before it enters the danger areas - I'd rather start with solid defenders and improve our attackers (Liverpool also has Salah, Mane, and Firmino bombing forward on the counter - not something to discount) before worrying about having ultra-proficient attacking fullbacks. That's just my personal preference, however.
This thread is about to become a nightmare
Andy Robertson. Contributed feck all offensively at Hull, I think he is not bad going forward now.
Before they had VVD, Liverpool fullback still able to attack with two clowns as their CBs.
Andy Robertson. Contributed feck all offensively at Hull, I think he is not bad going forward now.
CL final.And where did that get them?
And where did that get them?
Technical but not an attacking threat. He was obviously blessed with superior technical ability. Him becoming a danger as an outlet on the right developed as he got older.
it's a terrible own goal but I'd sooner assess AWB over the course of a season vs a singular game he's had a consistent game to be fair. Still better than Young and Dalot.
He was very good offensively at Hull. I don’t know how his attacking looked for those who watch football on Opta, but he was great at dribbling forward with the ball and bringing his team up the field.
Before they had VVD, Liverpool fullback still good in attacking with two clowns as their CBs.