Enigma_87
You know who
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2008
- Messages
- 27,968
No, I mean as a whole attacking game and ability to go past players and deliver a quality cross is more difficult to learn than vice versa.You're more than entitled to your opinion, but I think that view is shaped by what fullbacks have been asked to do in the last 5-10 years. Gone are the days when someone like Neville - never the most explosive attacker - would be the archetypal fullback. Maybe the game is truly moving toward flair players at outside back, but I would be shocked if we don't see some regression to the mean, where a fullback's defending is prized as highly as attacking ability.
That being said AWB is young and raw still so he will develop further.
To your second point: I would consider Lahm as a defender first, who improved in the attack as he got older. Javier Zanetti as well, although he never contributed as much to the attack as many modern defenders. Ashley Cole, from my memory (although it's been a long time since he was relevant, and I only tangentially followed his exploits at Arsenal) started out as a rock solid defender and became more and more of a wing back as he entered his peak.
You couldn't be more wrong on Zanetti tho(and actually on both examples). One of my favorite players and he was fantastic going forward. His game evolved exactly in what I mean - when he lost step or two he developed his defensive game and became more conservative. Ashley was wing back for Arsenal and much more attacking in the beginning of his career. Later under Mourinho he became more conservative.