I suppose that's the difference between us - I haven't suggested it is anything. I don't claim to know. What I am doing though is opening my mind up to the fact that I don't really have a clue and I'm just throwing some things out there to suggest why it could be. I'm not arrogantly asserting that I know what I'm talking about. Have you ever played Devil's advocate on a position you hold? If something really frustrates me, I try to look at it from the complete opposite point of view and see if I'm missing something or there's something I need to go and look into.
I'm not saying things can't be done quickly. I agree that if we threw £50 million in cash at Palace then they would probably have accepted this now and he likely would have signed. We haven't done that though, we submitted a bid and we're in the position of now negotiating around that. I don't imagine he would go to the Glazers for permission, I also never suggested he would, that would be ridiculous. But these sorts of things don't just follow a literal chain of command. I have no idea what you do for a living but have you worked in a position where you need to get budgets or anything signed off? In my experience, that sort of process can involve getting sign off from a different department and someone who may be lower in the overall chain to you but are still a required signature.
A CEO isn't just some dictator who does what he wants, when he wants. There will be other people involved that would need to be engaged from a finance, risk, marketing, legal side etc.