dove
New Member
- Joined
- May 15, 2013
- Messages
- 7,899
United obviously.So who does he support?
United obviously.So who does he support?
So who does he support?
The lads whole family support Arsenal. If Kroenke allowed Arsenal to spend a few bob, they might have had a good chance of signing him.From Croydon? Disgusting.
Carshalton Athletic I would hope.I'm a Croydon boy and guess who I support
Our RB is much bigger problem than our LW. Dalot isn’t ready for that RB role, AWB was one of the best RBs in the league last season while we had Young.There's a few reasons why you might think this.
1. We only signed him last summer. Give him a chance.
2. Let's actually get our coaches to coach and improve him, instead of giving up on him and getting a replacement already
3. He's shown promise, and our team has more holes than a swiss cheese. Why not give the RB spot to Dalot for now, while we throw that 50m into the pot and fix our gaping left and right wings? Or replace Eeyore up front? Or sign some of the 2-3 midfielders we need. We have other priorities, it's like your house being on fire then being pissed off because the windows need cleaning.
Wouldn't be surprised to see Solskjaer push Dalot further forward if this happens. He looked far more comfortable going forward last season, and was caught out a lot at the back.
So who does he support?
Carshalton Athletic I would hope.
"Most remarkable is the ease with which he has taken to the Premier League. At 14 there had been a debate at Palace as to whether Wan-Bissaka, a quiet, gangly kid, should be retained. By early 2017 the boyhood Arsenal supporter was still essentially striving to make his mark at a club brimming with wingers"So who does he support?
Not sure I agree, I guess it depends on the role we see James having and how he adapts. I'm not against the signing of AWB in and of itself, I just wouldn't want to see other, more pressing areas neglected in order to secure him.Our RB is much bigger problem than our LW. Dalot isn’t ready for that RB role, AWB was one of the best RBs in the league last season while we had Young.
I don't think he'd "replace" Dalot, we simply need another fullback. Valencia is gone, Young is not good enough and Darmian is practically gone too. That leaves us with Shaw, Dalot, Young and a bunch of kids who need more time (Laird, O'Connor).There's a few reasons why you might think this.
1. We only signed him last summer. Give him a chance.
2. Let's actually get our coaches to coach and improve him, instead of giving up on him and getting a replacement already
3. He's shown promise, and our team has more holes than a swiss cheese. Why not give the RB spot to Dalot for now, while we throw that 50m into the pot and fix our gaping left and right wings? Or replace Eeyore up front? Or sign some of the 2-3 midfielders we need. We have other priorities, it's like your house being on fire then being pissed off because the windows need cleaning.
I sincerely hope that James takes the league by a storm but I think we will have to be patient. This team needs 300m this summer to solve many problematic areas, Woodward needs to back his shit talking.Not sure I agree, I guess it depends on the role we see James having and how he adapts. I'm not against the signing of AWB in and of itself, I just wouldn't want to see other, more pressing areas neglected in order to secure him.
Leicester have two fantastic attacking fullbacks in Pereira & Chilwell.
How would a fullback pairing of Shaw and Wan Bissaka compare to their Leicester counterparts?
The Leicester duo are comfortably better IMO.
Leicester have two fantastic attacking fullbacks in Pereira & Chilwell.
How would a fullback pairing of Shaw and Wan Bissaka compare to their Leicester counterparts?
The Leicester duo are comfortably better IMO.
Leicester have two fantastic attacking fullbacks in Pereira & Chilwell.
How would a fullback pairing of Shaw and Wan Bissaka compare to their Leicester counterparts?
The Leicester duo are comfortably better IMO.
Leicester have two fantastic attacking fullbacks in Pereira & Chilwell.
How would a fullback pairing of Shaw and Wan Bissaka compare to their Leicester counterparts?
The Leicester duo are comfortably better IMO.
I don't particularly rate Shaw and I think he will end up being replaced sooner than later as well.
We need a new LB to compete and take over from Shaw . He isn't that good so if we got an attacking LB on that side we'll do fine.Leicester have two fantastic attacking fullbacks in Pereira & Chilwell.
How would a fullback pairing of Shaw and Wan Bissaka compare to their Leicester counterparts?
The Leicester duo are comfortably better IMO.
Neither Chilwell not Pereira can really defend.
Shaw and Wan Bissaka are more dependable defenders and better ball carriers in attacking transitions. Arguably the best in the league in those two respects.Leicester have two fantastic attacking fullbacks in Pereira & Chilwell.
How would a fullback pairing of Shaw and Wan Bissaka compare to their Leicester counterparts?
The Leicester duo are comfortably better IMO.
People are exaggerating the attacking support required by a fullback. Attackers and mids are meant to provide the threat, fullbacks are just a bonus if they can support well.
G Neville and and Evra for example were never amazing going forward. Neither was Brown.
I don't think he'd "replace" Dalot, we simply need another fullback. Valencia is gone, Young is not good enough and Darmian is practically gone too. That leaves us with Shaw, Dalot, Young and a bunch of kids who need more time (Laird, O'Connor).
and who knows, maybe Ole wants to move Dalot to RW. He was good going forward but suspect defensively.
Looks like we're going all in then. I have to admit I'm more than a bit skeptical about his attacking game but he does look very defensively assured, particularly in one v ones.
I suppose the positives of this are we're looking to get our business done early and that Ashley Young shouldn't have much of a future here next season.
Klopp bought Clyne for big money and move him when TAA step up.It doesn't sound like good team building strategy to spend a lot on a young RB, when we already have Dalot and two prospects in O'Connor and Laird. 4 if we count Brandon Williams. Essentially that gives us 3-4 Go's at solving the RB problem and we're essentially not giving it a try. There is no overrating in this strategy. We're essentially playing the odds we strike gold after trying out 4 good RB prospects because it's obviously hard to make the step up, and prospects are nothing but chances, not guarantees.
Doesn't it make more sense to try our internal options temporarily, and if it's clear RB is still a problem, go for AWB? To me, that's what Klopp would do or any club with a proper DOF. That's how we ended up with Rashford.
My favourite two points if true:
"In terms of AWBs offense, he has great ball control and is fairly quick. He engaged in 7.27 offensive duals a game. For comparison, Walker and Alexander-Arnold failed to engage in 5 per game."
"He made an average of 2.12 crosses per game with a 33% crossing accuracy. Let’s compare once again, with the premier league’s “best” crosser Alexander-Arnold who had the exact same crossing %."
Klopp bought Clyne for big money and move him when TAA step up.
If any of the internal options become than AWB the they'll play and replace him.
Also, there's some serious overrating Dalot and his attacking output on this thread. He's not good enough yet.
Shaw and Wan Bissaka are more dependable defenders and better ball carriers in attacking transitions. Arguably the best in the league in those two respects.
Chilwell and Pereira have better final balls, but that's not the be all and end all for a fullback to be top class.
As ever, people are getting wrapped up in the idea of fashionable formations. There's no such thing as 'modern' football as distinct from what's come before it in the last 3 decades. There are only successful teams that play a strategy that gets the most out of their individuals, and those that don't. 'Modern' football evolves by virtue of managers trying to do something different from the norm.
United following the tactics of Pep or Klopp won't guarantee winning football. What Ole has to do is build a squad of top class players and construct a gameplan that gets the most out of those players whilst minimising their weaknesses. Wan Bissaka can easily be a factor in that.
AWB has as much quality as any fullback in the league. If we can come up with a tactic that leverages his positive qualities as much as possible, he'll be a massive success. All he needs is the right RCM and RW ahead of him, and in return he can be the perfect RB behind them.
Ok, but still the point remains. You don't pass on the opportunity to buy on of the best players in the league just because what you currently have might be good enoughNo he didn't. Rodgers bought Clyne.
Chilwell in particular is far better at carrying the ball forward than Shaw, and I’d say Pereira is arguably superior to AWB too in that respect.
No fullbacks are better than AWB and Shaw defensively though, which is not to be sniffed at. In the PL, most attacking threat and star offensive players come from wide.
Ok, but still the point remains. You don't pass on the opportunity to buy on of the best players in the league just because what you currently have might be good enough
We're not signing one of the best players in the league. We're signing a player who we hope might end up being one of the best players in the league, but has a huge question mark over one of the most important aspects of a modern fullbacks game.
My favourite two points if true:
"In terms of AWBs offense, he has great ball control and is fairly quick. He engaged in 7.27 offensive duals a game. For comparison, Walker and Alexander-Arnold failed to engage in 5 per game."
"He made an average of 2.12 crosses per game with a 33% crossing accuracy. Let’s compare once again, with the premier league’s “best” crosser Alexander-Arnold who had the exact same crossing %."