- Joined
- Jun 5, 2019
- Messages
- 1
Meunier or AWB, either one will make me happy
Nah.Chilwell in particular is far better at carrying the ball forward than Shaw, and I’d say Pereira is arguably superior to AWB too in that respect.
Agreed.No fullbacks are better than AWB and Shaw defensively though, which is not to be sniffed at. In the PL, most attacking threat and star offensive players come from wide.
We're not signing one of the best players in the league. We're signing a player who we hope might end up being one of the best players in the league, but has a huge question mark over one of the most important aspects of a modern fullbacks game.
What do you think about Wan-Bissaka?We need a new LB to compete and take over from Shaw . He isn't that good so if we got an attacking LB on that side we'll do fine.
He was one of the best fullbacks in the league. He is a great defender and players never excel in every aspect of the game. Also, there is nothing more important about a full backs game in ‘modern’ football as opposed to historically - the position is the same, football hasn’t changed.
Nah.
Shaw gets dispossessed 0.5 times per game and has 83% pass completion. Chilwell gets dispossessed 1.3 times per game with 72% pass completion, and Pereira gets dispossessed 1 time per game with 78% pass completetion.
As a ball carrier and transition player, Shaw shits on the two Leicester lads.
If you want a reliable outball to transition from defence to attack, Shaw is as good as I've seen in the PL in the last few seasons.
That’s if you can get his fat arse beyond the halfway line. Your stats provide no perspective. If you try more dribbles in more dangerous areas of the pitch you will lose the ball more. The same goes for passing accuracy if you’re playing simple five yard passes.If you want a reliable outball to transition from defence to attack, Shaw is as good as I've seen in the PL in the last few seasons.
Your anecdotes provide no evidence.That’s if you can get his fat arse beyond the halfway line. Your stats provide no perspective. If you try more dribbles in more dangerous areas of the pitch you will lose the ball more. The same goes for passing accuracy if you’re playing simple five yard passes.
We all watched the same matches. Feel free to prove me wrong. Your non referenced stats are not evidence.Your anecdotes provide no evidence.
Let's be honest here, the bar has been raised by the likes of Guardiola and Klopp and we have to respond to that. When Wenger arrived at Arsenal all those years back, the standards in the top flight were raised and even Fergie mentioned that he had to adapt to what the Frenchman was doing at Arsenal and we sure did respond.Shaw and Wan Bissaka are more dependable defenders and better ball carriers in attacking transitions. Arguably the best in the league in those two respects.
Chilwell and Pereira have better final balls, but that's not the be all and end all for a fullback to be top class.
As ever, people are getting wrapped up in the idea of fashionable formations. There's no such thing as 'modern' football as distinct from what's come before it in the last 3 decades. There are only successful teams that play a strategy that gets the most out of their individuals, and those that don't. 'Modern' football evolves by virtue of managers trying to do something different from the norm.
United following the tactics of Pep or Klopp won't guarantee winning football. What Ole has to do is build a squad of top class players and construct a gameplan that gets the most out of those players whilst minimising their weaknesses. Wan Bissaka can easily be a factor in that.
AWB has as much quality as any fullback in the league. If we can come up with a tactic that leverages his positive qualities as much as possible, he'll be a massive success. All he needs is the right RCM and RW ahead of him, and in return he can be the perfect RB behind them.
My second preference after Cancelo. I also think his dribbling is better than what Shaw has to offer (always comes inside) and has got more unpredictability in his moves.What do you think about Wan-Bissaka?
I already have.We all watched the same matches. Feel free to prove me wrong. Your non referenced stats are not evidence.
Where have you done that?I already have.
AWB is more than “slightly better” than TFM
We have other priorities, it's like your house being on fire then being pissed off because the windows need cleaning.
More worth spending 60m when we could use the money in the most problematic area in midfield?
What if he turns out to be Prime Antonio Valencia on the peak of his defensive form? One thing is sure that his attacking instincts are not as good as his defensive ones, at the price you have got to be best in the world full back and a complete player.
Is Ferland Mendy one of the best full backs in the world and a complete player? How about Mendy who is wonderful going forward but not so much defending?
The price tag is set by AWB having an established floor is a premium defensive force at RB, and young enough that his attacking capability, which isn't non-existent, can improve as he's just 21 years old.
One reason I'm skeptical about signing this lad is because he is 21 and would likely cost a record fee. If he proves to be unproficient in possession and in attack, then he will most likely flop, and if he flops then we'd have to make a hefty loss or be stuck with a young, big-money flop.Of course it has. You've just seen the team that has just won the Champions League have two full backs who finished in the top 5 assists in the league. The team before them who won the CL 3x on the trot had Marcelo who's defending is routinely criticised, but was by far one of their best attacking players. Guardiola played Zinchenko as his left back for 30 games this season.
The focus of a full backs game has quite obviously shifted to the attacking half of the pitch.
True that.Wish we had a dog shit player like Walker tbh.
Of course it has. You've just seen the team that has just won the Champions League have two full backs who finished in the top 5 assists in the league. The team before them who won the CL 3x on the trot had Marcelo who's defending is routinely criticised, but was by far one of their best attacking players. Guardiola played Zinchenko as his left back for 30 games this season.
The focus of a full backs game has quite obviously shifted to the attacking half of the pitch.
One reason I'm skeptical about signing this lad is because he is 21 and would likely cost a record fee. If he proves to be unproficient in possession and in attack, then he will most likely flop, and if he flops then we'd have to make a hefty loss or be stuck with a young, big-money flop.
I'm worried that few seem to be bringing up his technical qualities and he is just being praised for being a 'defensive monster'. The best fullbacks aren't what they are because of their defensive skills, but mainly because of their proficiency in possession and contributions in the final third. I feel he'd he another signing that would prove limited in certain important aspects for the position they are meant to play. We have had to deal with Lukaku's poor technique, Bailly and Lindelof's weakness in the air, Memphis lacking that extra yard of pace, Fred's unsophistication in possession, a lack of dynamism with regards to Martial, Blind's lack of pace, Shaw's poor crossing ability etc. All these were, and will most likely be the undoing of these players. The concerns that are being highlighted about Wan-Bissaka's game in this thread are too important to be waved off for a big money fullback imo. I hope this signing does not backfire.
Rubbish. Attacking fullbacks have always existed. Before Marcelo there was Dani Alves, Maicon. Before them Zanetti, Zambrotta, Cafu, Roberto Carlos. The focus of a fullbacks game has not shifted anywhere and there is no ‘right’ kind of player for any position.
What would you say is the focus of a midfield in modern football? What are the common qualities between Madrid and Liverpool’s successful groups of midfielders? An Ivanovic/ Azpilicueta/ Abidal can excel at fullback just as that kind of player always could.
Which big European club doesn't have at least one attacking fullback?Yeah it’s becoming infuriating. There were overlapping full-backs in the 1970s.
You’d think it was a different sport the way some people go on. I’m not really seeing much evidence of these modern-game style full-backs at top clubs either.
Ferland mendy is costing 38 m pounds, while we have a bid of 40 rejected for a defensive full back.
Top clubs who focus on attack and focus on better ball retention in their team have the vision of choosing top attacking talents at full backs As they know they will spend most of their time attacking the opposition. We on the other hand are doing exactly the opposite, in 6 months we will have supporters questioning his attacking instincts and how it limits our ruthlessness going forward if we sign him for an insane price.
Where do our preferences lie? To be a poor team on the ball that we spend maximum time defending against top oppositions and full backs struggling to provide width and being not so efficient going forward?
What if he doesn't?https://www.euronews.com/2019/06/10...FjABegQIDxAH&usg=AOvVaw2iTGrayztJb4onSOsR4KwF
The quoted fee is 49m.
Why can't our vision be that we think AWB has excellent defensive ability and in a team that will have the ball more AWB, a converted winger, can show more in his attacking ability and develop further? Seems completely reasonable.
https://www.euronews.com/2019/06/10...FjABegQIDxAH&usg=AOvVaw2iTGrayztJb4onSOsR4KwF
The quoted fee is 49m.
Why can't our vision be that we think AWB has excellent defensive ability and in a team that will have the ball more AWB, a converted winger, can show more in his attacking ability and develop further? Seems completely reasonable.
Then we spank more money until we get someone who can.What if he doesn't?
Which big European club doesn't have at least one attacking fullback?
Ferland mendy is costing 38 m pounds, while we have a bid of 40 rejected for a defensive full back.
Top clubs who focus on attack and focus on better ball retention in their team have the vision of choosing top attacking talents at full backs As they know they will spend most of their time attacking the opposition. We on the other hand are doing exactly the opposite, in 6 months we will have supporters questioning his attacking instincts and how it limits our ruthlessness going forward if we sign him for an insane price.
Where do our preferences lie? To be a poor team on the ball that we spend maximum time defending against top oppositions and full backs struggling to provide width and being not so efficient going forward?
"Where Wenger led..."
Man UtdWhich big European club has never had one?
Man Utd
Wenger did infact lead in that time period..Behave.
Wenger did infact lead in that time period..