Tottenham had stood still due to lack of serious investment. They top score, and conceded least for a season, which is a good foundation to build on. Wasted chance. That’s more about Levy than the head coach.
Poch‘s style is not exactly gung-ho, yet it’s a modern style based on positioning play, pressing, being comfortable with the ball. This style would demand on players’ quality and compatibility, so there is a point where you must purchase new players to elevate/improve the team. Levy doesn’t spend (summer 2018 at all) (and overall) on the same level as City and Liverpool summer 2018. Expecting Poch Tottenham to continue to progress is just too unrealistic. Poch’s failure to win smaller trophies is a problem, but not so different to Klopp‘s Liverpool. Both reached a CL final, which is a turning point. Klopp had the backing, while the backing from Levy is laughable. Liverpool went on different level while Tottenham infighting and Poch lost the dressing room. Klopp’s Dortmund faced similar issue: style gets stale with squad quality decrease as replacement couldn’t fill in for the outgoing players. Klopp lost the dressing room, Dortmund lingering mid table despite their quality was still CL level.
It has been discussed many times here and on other forums, Klopp’s style implements counter attacking phase after the counter pressing phase, which is different than that of Pep,’s which prioritizes reorganizing the team shape, which in turn favors recycling possession first. Just state Poch’ style is based on playing off counter, to complain about his side is less attractive without considering context (lack of investment in squad quality over time) is just empty words. Not long ago, Klopp’s Liverpool was headless chicken in their approach, and struggled against teams that don’t allow them space to counter attack after their counter press (gen gen pressing)