If we wanted a striker, why didn't we go for Auba?
I hope we don't end up with Lukaku for a ridiculous fee.
I wouldn't say it's because he isn't muscly, it's more the fact that his game is to run in behind rather than hold-up in front of the defence. He's 6'2 and looks as equally built as someone like Lewandowski, for instance.
That's music to my ears. Putting aside football aspects I don't want to witness Griezmann and Mata doing hotline blings... Bleh!
Lukaku cannot trap a bag of cement.
Ain't that the truth.If we start the season with last years attack + Lukaku then you wont have to worry about goal celebrations all that often like.
Its none sense, either:
1. AG was never a target; or
2. the club have fed the media something to shut them up; or
3. A journo has made this up and everyone else has jumped on it.
There's no way we would switch our focus like a kid in a sweetshop. If he is a target, he will be ours, if not Mourinho has someone else in his mind and always has done.
If he is a target, he will be ours, if not Mourinho has someone else in his mind and always has done.
Should have signed a long term option last year rather than a pensioner. Wasn't a fan of short term thinking last year, I certainly am not happy now that it has cost us a world class signing
Lukaku cannot trap a bag of cement.
So let me get this clear. You are saying, we will either sign him...or not sign him
It sounds like Atlético is demanding 100% upfront so we need AG to have a tantrum.I don't believe this latest wave of journo tweets about a #9. Sounds like the club are attempting a bit of misdirection by leaking something to muddy the waters.
It sounds like Atlético is demanding 100% upfront so we need AG to have a tantrum.
I don't see how the briefing makes our position any stronger? It's not as if atletico want to sell but for a lump sum amount. They just don't want to sell at all.It sounds like Atlético is demanding 100% upfront so we need AG to have a tantrum.
I can see how the whole release clause upfront could impede dealings, mind.
What leverage though? This would make sense if atletico wanted to sell but only for a lump sum amount. Then, we gain an upper hand by doing this. Atletico don't want to sell at all though so doing this gives us nothing.Yep, that could be a distinct possibility. We respond by leaking something to journos to create a narrative that we are looking elsewhere as leverage in the Griezmann negotiations.
Unhappy players can change things.I don't see how the briefing makes our position any stronger? It's not as if atletico want to sell but for a lump sum amount. They just don't want to sell at all.
What leverage though? This would make sense if atletico wanted to sell but only for a lump sum amount. Then, we gain an upper hand by doing this. Atletico don't want to sell at all though so doing this gives us nothing.
If we wanted to operate with a degree of sense we'd overhaul our shite attack so we might actually have a chance of challenging for the title.
Its almost certainly 2 or 3 imo. There's no way we suddenly changed course because we realized we need a striker. Its pure crap for the easily led.
I was talking financial sense rather than footballing sense.
Or the easily led were already being led in regards to the Griezmann deal, Di Marzio never had him down as our priority for instance, but the herd of sheep journo's all parroted the Griezmann story to such an extent that evreyone started to accept it as fact, and I think part of it is that he's the only world class player on the market this summer.
Ofcourse and for that we need him to kick a fuss. How does this go towards it though? We can simply tell Greizmann's entourage that we need him to force a move out.Unhappy players can change things.
I got that mate, what I'm asking is how is briefing the press we're not interested going to make them accept installments though? Only way to force atletico's hand is via Greizmann himself kicking up a fuss. For that, we just tell him that this is how it is and he needs to make the club accept an installment structure. There's no reason to go to the press for this.To pay them in installments as opposed to pay mostly upfront.
Glad the club is looking at the right type of player rather then just a big name tbh. We need a holding mid (fabinho), a striker (belotti/morata/lukaku) and a winger (perisic) way before we need a griezmann type. Get those 3 in, play mkhitaryan on the right wing and griezmann really isnt needed. He would be the cherry on the icing type, and would obviously take us up a level, but only if we get the base team balanced first. Getting griezmann without the striker or winger would leave us unbalanced as hell and force us to play incredibly narrow, in turn hampering both pogba and griezmann. Not needed.
We don't need a Di Marzio tweet to confirm whether or not we are after someone. I work with media and know all the tricks about leaking stories for misdirection. This has all the hallmarks of just that.
nah, didn't need to wait. I said it plenty of times whilst we were linked to him and throughout the season. You don't build a winning team around 35 year oldsYou've waited all year to post this, haven't you Cpt. Hindsight?
Only Kylian M. Can save us now