@iamking You can't just say China, China, China when it comes to climate change and ignore the catastrophic economic and social consequences for the US
Ok, Vivek - I'll engage you.
You write that "He doesn't think climate crisis is a legitimate existential threat" and "having lofty climate ideals will lead to handing over the economic momentum to countries like China who have zero regards for climate and live in the same world and unless all the actors act in good faith".
Finger pointing at China is neither a strategy nor a plan. It's true China pollutes more than the US on an
absolute basis (4,250 MT CO2 emissions vs 10,000)
https://www.iea.org/countries/china
https://www.iea.org/countries/united-states
On a
relative basis we pollute WAY MORE (while manufacturing way less). China while still a developing country, has taken steps to control their green energy future. For example, an estimated 75-80% of the world’s solar panels, 77% of the world’s batteries and 60% of the world’s electric vehicles are currently manufactured in China. Within the solar manufacturing space in particular, the U.S. has to date failed to develop any meaningful domestic manufacturing capacity (First Solar aside) and is highly reliant on imports.
Why does this matter? The impact of
heat extremes on the economy, it's pretty straight forward to classify and quantify.
- Labor Productivity: under the most baseline projections, the United States could lose on average approximately $100 billion annually from heat-induced lost labor productivity. To put in simple English heat stress reduces labor productivity, as workers slow down work and take extra breaks to prevent overheating. It also causes machinery to overheat and fail, including vehicles, computers, and cooled production processes, for example. Transport infrastructure (for example runways) can become unusable etc.
- Impact on agricultural yields: Many key crops are vulnerable to extreme heat: corn, soy, and wheat, which collectively covered approximately 62 percent of harvested area in the United States in 2010, could face significant losses during growing seasons without adaptation
- Impact on health outcomes: Extreme heat is already a leading cause of mortality in the United States, but without adaptation, deaths could increase more than sixfold. Exposure to extreme heat at work can increase not only heat-related illness, but also accidental injury.
- Asset Damage: Dry conditions, driven in part by heat, can contribute to increases in the likelihood of wildfire occurrence and wildfire severity (example see western 11 states wildfires, Hawaii, Canadian wildfires - all rare events increasing in frequency at an alarming rate).
- Add here other factors like impact to tourism (Florida, California are heavily susceptible to this), reduced outdoor activities (Texas), increase in prices for essentials such as food and commodities and you get the picture.
Bottom line is this: We need to move away from
fossil fuels (60% is still too high). We need energy independence. Vivek's plan does not address either and it's pure demagoguery.