And yet...Harris will make a decent president I think. She has a lot more about her than Starmer and Scholz for example.
Well, it is impossible to have less about you than Scholz.
And yet...Harris will make a decent president I think. She has a lot more about her than Starmer and Scholz for example.
Respectively disagree, let's see what the post-debate polls do.Just watched it. Unfortunately, I don’t think it was the Harris landslide this thread is suggesting. She won, certainly, but partly due to Trump going completely off the rails in the second half when many viewers must have turned off or made up their minds. Many will have seen him as the winner of the pivotal first round, economy, where Harris could be perceived as dodging, and Trump escaped less harmed from the abortion round than he should have been because Harris/the moderators left his lunacy unchecked.
Still a good night for Harris who proved she can hold her own in these circumstances but I don’t think this moves the needle much.
With all due respect, is this the first time you heard of Donald Trump? Did you miss the last eight years?I was astonished with that too. Does Trump not know Orban is a dictator who ended democracy in his country? Or does he not care, the flattery is all that matters to him? Very weird "flex" from Trump: a dictator likes me!
The question should be: Is it true that Harris wants this to happen?! Concerning.is it true he said they're doing transgender operations on illegal aliens in prisons?
I was astonished with that too. Does Trump not know Orban is a dictator who ended democracy in his country? Or does he not care, the flattery is all that matters to him? Very weird "flex" from Trump: a dictator likes me!
I disagree, I think she utterly unmanned him. Harris had a few performance hurdles to clear: Is she "presidential", can she be rattled by a narcissistic bully, can she be tough but likable (Hillary Clinton's downfall), can she rattle her opponent, can she state her case without letting the terms be dictated by Trump? In all those things, she excelled. The fact or "fact" that her policy proposals are light on specifics is irrelevant because Trump doesn't have any policies. She's being held to a different standard than Trump has been. I think she did well on the economy too, mentioning that she and Biden had to clean up Trump's mess.Just watched it. Unfortunately, I don’t think it was the Harris landslide this thread is suggesting. She won, certainly, but partly due to Trump going completely off the rails in the second half when many viewers must have turned off or made up their minds. Many will have seen him as the winner of the pivotal first round, economy, where Harris could be perceived as dodging, and Trump escaped less harmed from the abortion round than he should have been because Harris/the moderators left his lunacy unchecked.
Still a good night for Harris who proved she can hold her own in these circumstances but I don’t think this moves the needle much.
Honestly, not sure id bang either of them.Didnt watch the debate, what were the ratings for both debaters?
Yes, we all know this and we have to take this account when we evaluate the performances. Trump being a lunatic is not in itself a weakness on his part, it’s his brand. It’s what he sells. But I agree that when it came to her demeanour and authority (tough without being condescending etc.), she did very well.I disagree, I think she utterly unmanned him. Harris had a few performance hurdles to clear: Is she "presidential", can she be rattled by a narcissistic bully, can she be tough but likable (Hillary Clinton's downfall), can she rattle her opponent, can she state her case without letting the terms be dictated by Trump? In all those things, she excelled. The fact or "fact" that her policy proposals are light on specifics is irrelevant because Trump doesn't have any policies. She's being held to a different standard than Trump has been. I think she did well on the economy too, mentioning that she and Biden had to clean up Trump's mess.
Look, when Biden flamed out in the last debate there were some stalwarts trying to pretend it wasn't an unmitigated disaster. But everyone who saw that previous debate knew it was Biden's death knell. The same is true in this debate: minor details can be quibbled over, but anyone who saw it knows that Trump made a total fecking fool of himself, he was incoherent, he rambled, he was an angry old man shouting at clouds.
As annoying as he is, I don't really get why people react with such vitriol to his modelling.Watch this motherfecker suddenly give Harris +5 over trump
In my case it's his name. Just reminds me to much of Karate Kid villain Terry Silver, who is of course a bit of a cnut.As annoying as he is, I don't really get why people react with such vitriol to his modelling.
That's understandable. Very poor from him.In my case it's his name. Just reminds me to much of Karate Kid villain Terry Silver, who is of course a bit of a cnut.
As annoying as he is, I don't really get why people react with such vitriol to his modelling.
He’s just correcting his modelWatch this motherfecker suddenly give Harris +5 over trump
I love this! They could just go in that, hard.If Harris doesn't do the next ad with 'Who let the dogs out', its a missed opportunity.
You clearly are not aware of Taylor Swift fandom strength.Are popstar endorsements a big thing in American politics or is Tay just a different breed of pop culture megalodon now?
Halting a VP candidate to tell him that Taylor Swift is backing him and Harris and social media acting like she is the silver bullet for Trump is a bit bizarre.
What a bizarre thing to fall apart on but that's Trump for you.I think that Harris started weak, but she basically knocked out Trump with the ‘people are leaving his rallies early’ line. I do not think Trump minded the Hannibal Lecter and windmills causing cancer, but when she said that his rallies are boring and people are leaving early, that was it for Trump, and after that, he was incapable of saying anything coherent and looked like an idiot even for his very low standards. Then it was all Kamala and overall I think she comfortably won the debate.
What a bizarre thing to fall apart on but that's Trump for you.
I think that Harris started weak, but she basically knocked out Trump with the ‘people are leaving his rallies early’ line. I do not think Trump minded the Hannibal Lecter and windmills causing cancer, but when she said that his rallies are boring and people are leaving early, that was it for Trump, and after that, he was incapable of saying anything coherent and looked like an idiot even for his very low standards. Then it was all Kamala and overall I think she comfortably won the debate.
It was incredible seeing him taking the bait on getting 400 million from his father and fixating on that in his answer, getting derailed on one of his favourite topics. He really is a literal child, and Harris won by treating him as such, because I think it was pretty much a tie after the first two rounds, economy and abortion.I think that Harris started weak, but she basically knocked out Trump with the ‘people are leaving his rallies early’ line. I do not think Trump minded the Hannibal Lecter and windmills causing cancer, but when she said that his rallies are boring and people are leaving early, that was it for Trump, and after that, he was incapable of saying anything coherent and looked like an idiot even for his very low standards. Then it was all Kamala and overall I think she comfortably won the debate.
Just watched it. Unfortunately, I don’t think it was the Harris landslide this thread is suggesting. She won, certainly, but partly due to Trump going completely off the rails in the second half when many viewers must have turned off or made up their minds. Many will have seen him as the winner of the pivotal first round, economy, where Harris could be perceived as dodging, and Trump escaped less harmed from the abortion round than he should have been because Harris/the moderators left his lunacy unchecked.
Still a good night for Harris who proved she can hold her own in these circumstances but I don’t think this moves the needle much.