VorZakone
What would Kenny G do?
- Joined
- May 9, 2013
- Messages
- 36,093
Yikes aren't they a decent pollster?
Trump +6 in Pennsylvania? No way man.
Yikes aren't they a decent pollster?
Yikes aren't they a decent pollster?
Yikes aren't they a decent pollster?
Pretty highly rated by 538. That poll is an outlier and Trump won’t win PA by six percentage points but it’s not great. Just when things were starting to feel a little optimistic.They are a GOP Leaning Pollsters ran by GOP strategists....
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/articl...o-fix-the-chronic-republican-problem-of-bad-p
At least with Harris, there is a chance of a change of direction. She was not President for the last four years - a fact that many wish to negate. The VP serves the President, she doesn't get to set policy. We know Biden is far more pro-Israel than most in the Democrat party and she will have a fresh four year term where she doesn't have to worry about losing votes. Anything seen as being Anti-Israel all of a sudden becomes Anti Semitic, which is not going to win you an election in 5 days time.
We have a binary choice. Which administration gives the Palestinians a chance of a better future? I agree with Mehdi Hasan on this one - its Harris.
I don't think any administration is preferable - Israeli support is deeply bipartisan. If the Dems are willing to sacrifice a few hundred thousand votes in their most crucial swing state in an election year, then the "pro-Palestinian" base makes no difference to the party structure, which is just as pro-Israel as the GOP. Same with Harris and her campaign, which have run an astonishingly insensitive campaign.
About the long-term future, I also believe both are equivalent. But, to play devil's advocate: if Trump does implement his "50, 100, 200%" tarrifs, they will crash the US economy and place its future as the global hegemon in peril. A weaker US is the fastest path to Palestinian freedom of any kind.
A poll showing this shouldn’t be published 5 days before a presidential election.If you look at the crosstabs, the poll has Trump leading Harris 49% to 48% with women voters! That is the kind of numbers we may see in Alabama!
I think it is quite shameless to deny half of the population basic rights about their own body, condemn a quarter of the population to dog-whistle racism and all future generations to a planet which doesn't care about accelerating climate change, just because you are a single-issue voter and that comes from affinity to a small group of people in global scales halfway across the world for mostly religious reasons.
And that's without even considering that it is a very complicated issue from a very complicated part of the world.
There was a poll on this here in Norway a while back:
Poll in the Netherlands:
Harris 68%
Trump 11%
Undecided/Don't know 21 %
Source: Ipsos
I have long avoided the endless debate about Gaza: Harris vs. Trump. Here is a simple way of explaining why I voted for Harris:
Scenario 1:
Harris=Trump on Gaza, 1-1
Harris> Trump on other issues. 1M>0
Conclusion: Harris
Scenario 2:
Harris> Trump on Gaza, 1.5>1
Harris> Trump on other issues. 1M>0
Conclusion: Harris
It’s simple mathematics.
(I articulated many times my disapproval of the Biden policy towards Gaza).
That would change substantially if Trump would be the head of the conservative party of THESE countries. politics are almost like a football team, the cnut you hate you love when plays for you with exceptions
Yes, this is bang on in my opinion. Cue another 50 pages of back and forth...
It's not really applicable. You vote more for the party, and not the figurehead in my neck of the woods. Besides, the Republicans are FAR FAR more to the right of our only "far right" party.
Totally disagree. All the evidence of what Trump wishes to do about Gaza is all there for you. Or should i say, what he won't do, because he will ignore the issue as he doesnt give two hoots.
Some fuzzy logic there. Vote for Trump because he will crash the economy and thus the US won't be able to send weapons to Israel!
That is like saying we should burn down Old Trafford to avoid losing the next game!
There is no correlation historically between a drop in defence spending and US recessions.
Defence spending accounts for 3% of US GDP. Pull that money and you make the problem even worse!
I have long avoided the endless debate about Gaza: Harris vs. Trump. Here is a simple way of explaining why I voted for Harris:
Scenario 1:
Harris=Trump on Gaza, 1-1
Harris> Trump on other issues. 1M>0
Conclusion: Harris
Scenario 2:
Harris> Trump on Gaza, 1.5>1
Harris> Trump on other issues. 1M>0
Conclusion: Harris
It’s simple mathematics.
(I articulated many times my disapproval of the Biden policy towards Gaza).
To the right of, yes, but not FAR FAR to the right IMO. They are importing American culture war as fast as they can, and it's working.
Severity of language is not my concern, accuracy is.I agree. You're being attacked because 'unsatisfactory' is not strong enough a word. It's not what I would say either, but it makes discussion hard if you can only say something if you're sufficiently harsh in your wording.
I'm not saying vote for Trump. I'm saying that reading magic into things Harris has never said, in order to believe that she'd change course on Israel policy, should be taken as seriously as what I said about Trump crashing the economy.
Regarding the discussion about Gaza: who the Israelis prefer: Harris or Trump? The answer is clear.
“Israelis massively favor Republican Donald Trump over Democrat Kamala Harris in the upcoming US presidential elections, according to a poll published Monday.
When asked who they preferred as the next US president, 66 percent chose the former president, while only 17% said they wanted to see the US vice president win the election. A further 17% said they did not know.”
https://www.timesofisrael.com/poll-...y-favor-trump-over-harris-in-us-election/amp/https://www.timesofisrael.com/poll-...y-favor-trump-over-harris-in-us-election/amp/
Well the obvious reason, and it doesn’t just apply to threads concerning the American election, is that the Current Events section simply isn’t representative of the wider population.Can anyone explain to me why 50% of Americans would vote trump but it seems like less than 5% on here would. Is it an American mentality? Are there people who'd vote for Trump on this website who aren't participating in the thread? Would most Europeans not go near Trump? Genuinely curious
Well the obvious reason, and it doesn’t just apply to threads concerning the American election, is that the Current Events section simply isn’t representative of the wider population.
I agree with your example but I'm not sure about the case that triggered this conversation. Anyway, fair enough re. your point here.Severity of language is not my concern, accuracy is.
That doesn't mean everone has to give a full accounting of events but we should strive to fairly reflect the reality of what has occurred in our descriptions.
If someone were to say that "Trump is being too tough on immigration" in relation to his Haitian comments, I think that is bullshit. Trump has been engaged in violent and racist fascist lies and propaganda. Use language that describes that. And it doesn't have to be excessively strong either.
There was a poll in a national newspaper in Belgium, stating Harris and Trump policies. About 85% of Belgians would vote Harris based on that.
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump sued CBS on Thursday over an interview of his Democratic rival Kamala Harris aired on its "60 Minutes" news program in early October that the lawsuit alleged was and misleading, according to a court filing.
The complaint, filed in federal court in the Northern District of Texas, alleges that the network aired two different responses from Harris responding to a question about the war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza.
The version that aired during the "60 Minutes" program on Oct. 6 did not include what the lawsuit calls a "word salad" response from Harris about the Biden administration's influence on Israel's conduct of the war.
Kind of a side point, but this idea of openly advertising your political position is so strange to me. I couldn't imagine decorating my home with a political sign or wearing an item of clothing indicating who I'm going to vote for.Had a hospital check-up today, a 3 mile trip each way thru mostly suburban housing 10 miles out of STL city, about half you'd classify as lower income and half as middle income areas, the county is a Demcratic area as a whole, what struck me most was the general lack of yard signs compared with previous elections
I saw just 2 Harris/Walz signs, 1 Trump and 1 Trump/Vance
MO has an amendment on Abortion being protected in the State Constitution, I saw maybe 15 against and about 7-8 in favour, allowing sports betting with the money raised protected for education I saw zero, annsd a local proposition for firefighters outnumbering everything else put together with only yes and no nays sih
Not scientific I know, but it just appeared to apathetic compared to elections past
There are zero signs on my street and none on the streets either side of me. There's one guy a few streets over who has a Trump flag, but that's it. I think it's to avoid alienating your neighbors this time. Rhetoric is too strong, passions too inflamed. I'm pretty sure the guy near me who has a dually pickup truck and a 2nd amendment sticker on it is a Trump fan, but he/they know if they put up a sign it's going to trigger chaos in the neighborhood. There are a lot of immigrants and nonwhites in my neighborhood, so that guy is probably accurately seeing which way the wind is blowing.Had a hospital check-up today, a 3 mile trip each way thru mostly suburban housing 10 miles out of STL city, about half you'd classify as lower income and half as middle income areas, the county is a Demcratic area as a whole, what struck me most was the general lack of yard signs compared with previous elections
I saw just 2 Harris/Walz signs, 1 Trump and 1 Trump/Vance
MO has an amendment on Abortion being protected in the State Constitution, I saw maybe 15 against and about 7-8 in favour, allowing sports betting with the money raised protected for education I saw zero, annsd a local proposition for firefighters outnumbering everything else put together with only yes and no nays sih
Not scientific I know, but it just appeared to apathetic compared to elections past
This time 'round it's been agit prop. The people driving around with Trump flags in their cars and the "Trump train" (caravan) shit is to provoke, not to express solidarity. Trump has really caused this country to come unglued. It has never been this bad before. Once Trump is dead and gone I hope we get back to our usual brand of dysfunction.Kind of a side point, but this idea of openly advertising your political position is so strange to me. I couldn't imagine decorating my home with a political sign or wearing an item of clothing indicating who I'm going to vote for.
I’ve no knowledge of the print media in Belgium but the dwindling relevance of newspapers themselves together with the political ‘affiliation’ of the particular newspaper you’re referring to will be factors in the poll result.There was a poll in a national newspaper in Belgium, stating Harris and Trump policies. About 85% of Belgians would vote Harris based on that.
Had a hospital check-up today, a 3 mile trip each way thru mostly suburban housing 10 miles out of STL city, about half you'd classify as lower income and half as middle income areas, the county is a Demcratic area as a whole, what struck me most was the general lack of yard signs compared with previous elections
I saw just 2 Harris/Walz signs, 1 Trump and 1 Trump/Vance
MO has an amendment on Abortion being protected in the State Constitution, I saw maybe 15 against and about 7-8 in favour, allowing sports betting with the money raised protected for education I saw zero, annsd a local proposition for firefighters outnumbering everything else put together with only yes and no nays sih
Not scientific I know, but it just appeared to apathetic compared to elections past
There are zero signs on my street and none on the streets either side of me. There's one guy a few streets over who has a Trump flag, but that's it. I think it's to avoid alienating your neighbors this time. Rhetoric is too strong, passions too inflamed. I'm pretty sure the guy near me who has a dually pickup truck and a 2nd amendment sticker on it is a Trump fan, but he/they know if they put up a sign it's going to trigger chaos in the neighborhood. There are a lot of immigrants and nonwhites in my neighborhood, so that guy is probably accurately seeing which way the wind is blowing.
This time 'round it's been agit prop. The people driving around with Trump flags in their cars and the "Trump train" (caravan) shit is to provoke, not to express solidarity. Trump has really caused this country to come unglued. It has never been this bad before. Once Trump is dead and gone I hope we get back to our usual brand of dysfunction.
There's not much point in yard signs here either. Two Harris signs and zero Trump signs at the hundred or so houses in my community. Everyone knows that the overwhelming majority here will vote Harris even though the residents are mostly white and over 60. Anyone who puts up a Trump sign risks being shunned indefinitely.There are zero signs on my street and none on the streets either side of me. There's one guy a few streets over who has a Trump flag, but that's it. I think it's to avoid alienating your neighbors this time. Rhetoric is too strong, passions too inflamed. I'm pretty sure the guy near me who has a dually pickup truck and a 2nd amendment sticker on it is a Trump fan, but he/they know if they put up a sign it's going to trigger chaos in the neighborhood. There are a lot of immigrants and nonwhites in my neighborhood, so that guy is probably accurately seeing which way the wind is blowing.
The actual debate is whether people vote using this type of simple mathematics at all times and whether they ought to.I have long avoided the endless debate about Gaza: Harris vs. Trump. Here is a simple way of explaining why I voted for Harris:
Scenario 1:
Harris=Trump on Gaza, 1-1
Harris> Trump on other issues. 1M>0
Conclusion: Harris
Scenario 2:
Harris> Trump on Gaza, 1.5>1
Harris> Trump on other issues. 1M>0
Conclusion: Harris
It’s simple mathematics.
(I articulated many times my disapproval of the Biden policy towards Gaza).
Put this up on my roof deck on Monday....
My wife made me take it down though. Fear of retribution from MAGA!
Smart she is
Worth it not is
Honestly, they should be shunned. I was in a facebook community group for my area, and someone wrote something that caused a bunch of "neighbors" to tag that person and say things like, "Just cast my vote for TRUMP, just for you" etc. It's a weird sickness these people have. It's a triumphalist attitude. When others asked if they were not bothered by voting for a felon, racist, rapist, fraudster, feeble minded nitwit, (etc.), they chalked that up to "fake news", and said the Justice Dept has been "weaponized" against Trump (even though the state courts are not under the DoJ). It's sad, but I hope/pray that Harris wins and that Trump goes to prison, and then the spell will be broken.There's not much point in yard signs here either. Two Harris signs and zero Trump signs at the hundred or so houses in my community. Everyone knows that the overwhelming majority here will vote Harris even though the residents are mostly white and over 60. Anyone who puts up a Trump sign risks being shunned indefinitely.
We do live in a very blue area. But hey, she was probably right. Especially so close to a poll location !