MrMarcello
In a well-ordered universe...
Most unsurprising thing ever. He’s a proper whacko gun nut, pro-war, anti-choice, hick of a Republican.
Never forget his wacky 2012 call to all christians to vote out Obama.
Most unsurprising thing ever. He’s a proper whacko gun nut, pro-war, anti-choice, hick of a Republican.
Never forget his wacky 2012 call to all christians to vote out Obama.
I can see the issue with it, but I think the idea is it is anonymous and the sacks are only opened in fraud investigations with specific ballots taken out. To track a person from the vote you would need the ballot number, the paper linking the number to the vote registration number and link that to your name and the ballot paper itself. The papers are destroyed after one year.
It does stop fraud after-the-event, but that's not saying it's great.
But it's clearly not anonymous since a specific ballot is linked to a specific person.
Badly worded. I'm agreeing, it's possible for a government official to link a ballot to a person for 1 year.
This is the crux of it, yes. Requiring ID that some people simply do not have the time or money to aquire disenfranchised thousands of people in US elections.To be honest I have no problems with the Government requiring ID to vote, as long as they provide for it and pay for it. Otherwise it is just a way of ensuring the poor are not able to vote, and it is no coincidence that a lot of them do not vote Tory.
Or more because there is a difference between what governments are supposed to do and what they actually do. The moment you give them the ballot, they are effectively in full control of it, from the point of view of a potential dictatorship that system is obviously terrible.
This is the crux of it, yes. Requiring ID that some people simply do not have the time or money to aquire disenfranchised thousands of people in US elections.
Thanks for saving me the effort of replying to the questions, too! Couldn't have said it better myself.
Like I said earlier I think most voting systems in the world are old and haven't caught up with modern technology and more importantly modern life. Ours is probably more antiquated than most and I wouldn't be surprised to learn that the basics of it go back centuries although I have no idea.
Personally, I think technology could be used to give a completely anonymous voting system which is easier to use, easier to measure and doesn't disenfranchise voters who can't make it on the day for whatever reason. The whole system needs moving forward decades, at least in the UK.
Don't you guys have in-person early voting?
His career is now over...oh wait it has been for a while now. He's just a lonely has been trying to seem relevant..next
You don't actually tell them your name first, you tell them your address. Unlikely there are too many John Smiths living at the same address.But how does it work in practice? I'm not interested in the whole voter fraud issue or anything - but what happens when John Smith walks up, announces that he's John Smith... and there are 13 other John Smiths in that particular district. What happens? Do they ask for his address or date of birth or what?
Then you just ask for a postal vote.There is a negative to the one polling station method as it reduces the number voting. My work (pre-covid) means that I could be anywhere on a particular day and there is no way I would know a few weeks in advance. I've missed a couple of votes because of that.
You could argue that I should go for a proxy vote, but I'd rather do it myself if I'm around. Moving the vote to a weekend has been alluded to which would help.
Personally, I think with today's technologies the concept of going in person (particularly when you don't even need ID when you get there) is pretty pointless, a waste of time and reduces the number of people bothering. There's a number of methods that could be used to make remote voting online infallible.
Then you just ask for a postal vote.
Like I said earlier I think most voting systems in the world are old and haven't caught up with modern technology and more importantly modern life. Ours is probably more antiquated than most and I wouldn't be surprised to learn that the basics of it go back centuries although I have no idea.
Personally, I think technology could be used to give a completely anonymous voting system which is easier to use, easier to measure and doesn't disenfranchise voters who can't make it on the day for whatever reason. The whole system needs moving forward decades, at least in the UK.
I know, but it'd be easier to hand count than use machines to count, then have people doubt the findings of the machines and have to do it all again by hand anyway. I can see this happening as standard now given all the BS this year. Would be easier to cut out the middle man/machine, like most other countries do.They've already covered this in some states, including Georgia (the most contested/cried about state by the repubs, even after 2 recounts) where there is a paper ballot to back up every single vote counted on the electronic machines.
Makes the voting machine claims even more laughable, this isn't in place in all states yet however.
Yeah, I've been in the same position. While I had uncertainty, I just asked for a postal vote rather than leave it to chance. Like I say, anyway, I think elections should take place at the weekend, as fewer people would be affected by their work schedules.Which you have to do a while in advance and my job I can know 1 to 2 days in advance that I'm on the other-side of the country. I could do it anyway, yeah but it's not ideal.
Voting system or tools are just a tool. Our longest dictator has a clean election (no magic votes etc), it doesnt stop him rigging it in his favor.
The faulty lies in the counter. Not the vote itself.
And while technology could help you still need valid id to vote. The flaw in the us is not how they vote, but more on political level vote suppression.
Nope, just postal or proxy voting here
I'm not sure what ID is required from state to state, but reading up on it, about 1/3 require photo ID, such as drivers licenses or passports. I'm fairly sure they don't give out free drivers licenses or passports.Around here it doesn't take time or money to get an ID card, outside of a picture. So that argument is difficult to understand from a french standpoint.
That's not Chuck Norris ffs
Except for the different eye colour and the fact that Norris is around 80 years old which this guy clearly isn’t. If you look at recent pics of him he bears no resemble to whoever this knock off bloke is in the photo.Really? It looks exactly like him.
Really? It looks exactly like him.
Except for the different eye colour and the fact that Norris is around 80 years old which this guy clearly isn’t. If you look at recent pics of him he bears no resemble to whoever this knock off bloke is in the photo.
I believed it was him on the photo because frankly him being there would be the opposite of surprising. Guess that's called confirmation bias.That's not Chuck Norris ffs
Oh he's probably a MAGA idiot, but likely not so stupid as to throw himself in with the mob that terrorised the capitol. He's always pretty much endorsed Mike Huckerbee anyway.I thought it was him because frankly him being there would be the opposite of surprising
Wait, so you just pop into a polling station and say your name and that's it?
That sounds mental
Never forget his wacky 2012 call to all christians to vote out Obama.
Chuck Norris washes his eyes with pepper spray in the morning.If Chuck Norris was there he'd have karate kicked the shit out of the Capitol cops and be President right now.
America’s right wing has a weird obsession with “socialists”. I wonder which policies they refer to when they use the word as if it’s the worst thing that can happen to them.