A parody of a parody of a sad man.
It shows how much he relies on Fox to maintain his facade. The moment they give time to anyone else who criticizes him he goes nuts, because he knows it will influence his core audience.
A parody of a parody of a sad man.
Like father like sonDon Jr. is a nobody with zero political credibility.
Like father like son
Ivanka and donn jnr joint ticket with trump tv backing them all they way (until baron goes all caligula and takes over )Not at all. Trump Sr. is a highly accomplished con artist with a media apparatus at his disposal. Jr. is an unaccomplished loser in desperate search of his father's approval, when the father only likes the his eldest daughter.
With the rehabilitation W got with this current presidency, it’s not inconceivable for Ivanka 2024/28. Followed by Don Jr. 32/36.
Dubya benefited from Trump's atrociousness and incompetence, which made his presidency seem not so bad.
Most of the rehabilitation seems to have been done by the time Obama finished his second term. And as bad as Trump is (dire, obviously), Bush Jr is still a war criminal who was instrumental in the death of hundreds of thousands of civilians. Honestly, it might be millions at this point, with the knock-on effects.
Most of the rehabilitation seems to have been done by the time Obama finished his second term. And as bad as Trump is (dire, obviously), Bush Jr is still a war criminal who was instrumental in the death of hundreds of thousands of civilians. Honestly, it might be millions at this point, with the knock-on effects.
https://swampland.time.com/2013/04/...popular-continues-trend-of-former-presidents/Hard to tell really, I can’t find any regular polling on it after his presidency.
Still think Bush II was worse than Trump has been.
Still think Bush II was worse than Trump has been.
Still think Bush II was worse than Trump has been.
I think this is about right. W brought far more sufferings to the world at large, while Trump inflicted much bigger damage on American public discourse, institution and racial relation. Economic damage will be about the same.Makes sense if you live outside the US, definitely not if you live in the US though.
Yep, interesting how the perspective differs.Makes sense if you live outside the US, definitely not if you live in the US though.
In a way more so bc his administration laid all the regulatory and legislative groundwork for what has been happening these last few years. Whether its strengthening the power of executive orders (which ironically of course they then bitched about Obama using against them) - to politicizing the courts, empowering the likes of Fox and sheer contempt for holding their own accountable to name a few things - I agree. Without the W admin there wouldn't be a Trump admin. For the American people specifically though - nothing comes close to the destructive force that is Trump.Not even debatable. Bush was way worse.
To be fair, he literally started his term by suffering the worst attack in history on domestic soil.I think this is about right. W brought far more sufferings to the world at large, while Trump inflicted much bigger damage on American public discourse, institution and racial relation. Economic damage will be about the same.
I think this is about right. W brought far more sufferings to the world at large, while Trump inflicted much bigger damage on American public discourse, institution and racial relation. Economic damage will be about the same.
It’s well documented that he wanted to go into Iraq regardless of 9/11. Even if you think Afghanistan was justified, which I think most people would disagree, the attack is still no excuse for starting a war because he wants to resolve his daddy issues.To be fair, he literally started his term by suffering the worst attack in history on domestic soil.
Based on conversations here and elsewhere, I would have guessed W is a much bigger point of fixation for foreigners than Americans at this point.Makes sense if you live outside the US, definitely not if you live in the US though.
Genghis was also more tolerant of religion and freedom of expression. But he killed quite a few folk. It's quite funny; some months ago I was watching an undergrad History & International Relations class try to argue whether Genghis or Hitler was worse. Very few seemed to feel they might not be analogous.
It’s well documented that he wanted to go into Iraq regardless of 9/11. Even if you think Afghanistan was justified, which I think most people would disagree, the attack is still no excuse for starting a war because he wants to resolve his daddy issues.
Still think Bush II was worse than Trump has been.
Responsible for up to 40m deaths and up to 10% of the global population at the time.
Responsible for up to 40m deaths and up to 10% of the global population at the time.
To be fair, they killed everyone regardless of religion in their infamous massacres, that's a type of non-discrimination, right?
Globally, Bush 2 was worse. He impacted the planet. Trump has just fecked up America. Thankfully.
To be fair, they killed everyone regardless of religion in their infamous massacres, that's a type of non-discrimination, right?
Actually Afghanistan was justified only because it was basically an untouched safe haven for robustly training terrorists. The way they went about solving that issue though was a total disaster. The real crime was the Iraq war, which had literally zero valid justification. Rumsfeld, Cheney and co. had "unfinished business" there. I also believe that Cheney enriched himself via his links to Haliburton by waging war. Those folks really are war criminals for the suffering they caused and if they were in charge of any other country they would be on trial in the Hague.
Globally, Bush 2 was worse. He impacted the planet. Trump has just fecked up America. Thankfully.
Climate change.
Climate change.
Worse for who? Humanity?