2020 US Elections | Biden certified as President | Dems control Congress

Status
Not open for further replies.
Its because he has a very solid propaganda apparatus in place to keep his flock on board. Fox News/OAN, Talk Radio, all of which gets amplified on right wing social media etc. If you remove any one of these pieces (except OAN which is too small), his entire support structure would crumble.

Yeah, from the outside it does seem like some of the news outlets over there are so partisan that having any journalistic standard is irrelevant. It’d be interesting to see how people would vote if everyone just got the same, relatively unbiased news coverage.

A good proportion of them are dyed in the wool Republicans who support the party above everything else. And for them, being anti-Democrat is as important as being an actual Republican (which describes Trump's irrelevant antagonism to Obama/Clinton pretty accurately).

There's also the very human flaw of many of them being unwilling to admit they were wrong to have voted for him in the first place in 2016. They'll never stop 'approving' of him.

And that is exactly why having only two parties is ridiculous. Particularly in a country with 350 million people. I’d be a dem if I was American, but I’m much more of of leftie than what they offer, and I’m sure many republicans would vote for another right leaning party if they had the chance.
 
It’s because they know how full of shit democrats are and can be trusted to help Trump actually pass republican legislature with ease.

I’m not inspired by the dems at all either. It seems to me that a two-party system and way too much money has corrupted the institution completely.

I’m guessing those in power have zero interest in revamping the system, so I’m not sure how to fix it outside of a revolution.
 
I’m not inspired by the dems at all either. It seems to me that a two-party system and way too much money has corrupted the institution completely.

I’m guessing those in power have zero interest in revamping the system, so I’m not sure how to fix it outside of a revolution.

That's the only way.
 
I’m not inspired by the dems at all either. It seems to me that a two-party system and way too much money has corrupted the institution completely.

I’m guessing those in power have zero interest in revamping the system, so I’m not sure how to fix it outside of a revolution.
Blame everything on trump. Literally everything.
 
It is the dem strategy. Blame trump for everything, offer voters feck all in terms of policy in the midst of record employment numbers, and just keep talking about polls.

Sounds like you’re American, so you know more about what goes on over there than me.

And you’re probably right. I’m guessing that neither party have any interest in dismantling a political system that keeps them rich and in power.
 
Sounds like you’re American, so you know more about what goes on over there than me.

And you’re probably right. I’m guessing that neither party have any interest in dismantling a political system that keeps them rich and in power.

Its not that neither party want it - its because the structure of the government makes it very difficult. The Constitution, Electoral College etc. are not amenable to structural change, especially during times when people are doing relatively well.
 
Its not that neither party want it - its because the structure of the government makes it very difficult. The Constitution, Electoral College etc. are not amenable to structural change, especially during times when people are doing relatively well.
Quick reminder that we are in the middle of a recession that hasn’t hit full swing yet.
 
Quick reminder that we are in the middle of a recession that hasn’t hit full swing yet.

True. That’s going to not reflect well on Trump, or even Biden if he wins since it will be him who has to pull the country out of recession, much as Obama did in 2009.
 
True. That’s going to not reflect well on Trump, or even Biden if he wins since it will be him who has to pull the country out of recession, much as Obama did in 2009.
I don’t care much for the candidates or Obama. But my point was about policy and what the dems are doing to help during a recession.
 
Dem can't win

If Biden win he'll be facing the biggest depression in 21st century and the republicans will not stop shouting about it every day till 2024. You'd imagine Trump on the sideline bickering?
If Biden lost, trump will keep on pinning everything on Democrats / Obama / Hillary and there's nothing the dems could do
Knowing how Trump works his base will lap up every narrative no matter how absurd it is.
 
Too many people are doing very well for that to ever happen. Most simply want government to function better without the perpetual gridlock.

Too many are doing the opposite though. And it's not new. Since the seventies, US workers have less and less acquisitive power. (been able to buy cheap shit from China doesn't mean shit)

It's like global warming. You know it's happening but you can't really see it unless you pay attention.

And it's such a fine line. Equilibrium is broken slowly, but once the balance breaks, the consequences will come crushing down fast. How far are the people in power, willing to keep stretching the gum?

You know I've been saying for years that I'm surprised that Chile and USA hasn't revolt already. Well... Fast forward a few years and it's happening now. Abused societies are waking up and there is no coming back from that. Either people in power concede some, or violent revolution is inevitable.
 
It is the dem strategy. Blame trump for everything, offer voters feck all in terms of policy in the midst of record employment numbers, and just keep talking about polls.
I know you have a particular distaste for such discussions, but worth noting for others that the Democratic-led congress has passed over 400 bills since taking power in 2018, but that Mitch has held over 300 up in the senate, because he refuses to allow anything to happen except Republican judges, because presumably some minority stole his lunch money when was a younger turtle. Note 275 of those stalled bills were passed in the house with bipartisan support.

A few things in these bills:
- Raise minimum wage, and ensure women are raised to equality
- Cut taxes for Gold Star families
- Protect the ACA, including pre-existing conditions, and increasing sign-up periods and access
- Several gun restriction bills
- Several vets bills
- Reauthourisation of the violence against women act

And so forth.

The narrative that 'both sides are as bad as the other' was planned, written and executed by Newt in his hopes of reducing partisan politics into pure nihilism, and many posters on here seem to have embraced it.

Both sides are not nearly as bad as each other. The dems are far from perfect, but my God if you care about health, the environment, education, income redistribution, racial inequality, LGBT rights or just about not having Jared f*cking Kushner as the head of everything you should only vote one way.
 
I know you have a particular distaste for such discussions, but worth noting for others that the Democratic-led congress has passed over 400 bills since taking power in 2018, but that Mitch has held over 300 up in the senate, because he refuses to allow anything to happen except Republican judges, because presumably some minority stole his lunch money when was a younger turtle. Note 275 of those stalled bills were passed in the house with bipartisan support.

A few things in these bills:
- Raise minimum wage, and ensure women are raised to equality
- Cut taxes for Gold Star families
- Protect the ACA, including pre-existing conditions, and increasing sign-up periods and access
- Several gun restriction bills
- Several vets bills
- Reauthourisation of the violence against women act

And so forth.

The narrative that 'both sides are as bad as the other' was planned, written and executed by Newt in his hopes of reducing partisan politics into pure nihilism, and many posters on here seem to have embraced it.

Both sides are not nearly as bad as each other. The dems are far from perfect, but my God if you care about health, the environment, education, income redistribution, racial inequality, LGBT rights or just about not having Jared f*cking Kushner as the head of everything you should only vote one way.

The green party? Agreed.
 
I know you have a particular distaste for such discussions, but worth noting for others that the Democratic-led congress has passed over 400 bills since taking power in 2018, but that Mitch has held over 300 up in the senate, because he refuses to allow anything to happen except Republican judges, because presumably some minority stole his lunch money when was a younger turtle. Note 275 of those stalled bills were passed in the house with bipartisan support.

A few things in these bills:
- Raise minimum wage, and ensure women are raised to equality
- Cut taxes for Gold Star families
- Protect the ACA, including pre-existing conditions, and increasing sign-up periods and access
- Several gun restriction bills
- Several vets bills
- Reauthourisation of the violence against women act

And so forth.

The narrative that 'both sides are as bad as the other' was planned, written and executed by Newt in his hopes of reducing partisan politics into pure nihilism, and many posters on here seem to have embraced it.

Both sides are not nearly as bad as each other. The dems are far from perfect, but my God if you care about health, the environment, education, income redistribution, racial inequality, LGBT rights or just about not having Jared f*cking Kushner as the head of everything you should only vote one way.

Having a Dem Senate and President would be helpful in getting many of these passed.
 
Too many are doing the opposite though. And it's not new. Since the seventies, US workers have less and less acquisitive power. (been able to buy cheap shit from China doesn't mean shit)

It's like global warming. You know it's happening but you can't really see it unless you pay attention.

And it's such a fine line. Equilibrium is broken slowly, but once the balance breaks, the consequences will come crushing down fast. How far are the people in power, willing to keep stretching the gum?

You know I've been saying for years that I'm surprised that Chile and USA hasn't revolt already. Well... Fast forward a few years and it's happening now. Abused societies are waking up and there is no coming back from that. Either people in power concede some, or violent revolution is inevitable.

Many of these things are true. They also only require a minor course correction to remedy - A good Dem President along with a solid blue Congress. Obama had his chance (briefly) and waffled in favor of attempting to work across the aisle, at a time when McConnell and others were plotting to bring him down. The next Dem President should start slinging major bills from day one.
 
I know you have a particular distaste for such discussions, but worth noting for others that the Democratic-led congress has passed over 400 bills since taking power in 2018, but that Mitch has held over 300 up in the senate, because he refuses to allow anything to happen except Republican judges, because presumably some minority stole his lunch money when was a younger turtle. Note 275 of those stalled bills were passed in the house with bipartisan support.

A few things in these bills:
- Raise minimum wage, and ensure women are raised to equality
- Cut taxes for Gold Star families
- Protect the ACA, including pre-existing conditions, and increasing sign-up periods and access
- Several gun restriction bills
- Several vets bills
- Reauthourisation of the violence against women act

And so forth.

The narrative that 'both sides are as bad as the other' was planned, written and executed by Newt in his hopes of reducing partisan politics into pure nihilism, and many posters on here seem to have embraced it.

Both sides are not nearly as bad as each other. The dems are far from perfect, but my God if you care about health, the environment, education, income redistribution, racial inequality, LGBT rights or just about not having Jared f*cking Kushner as the head of everything you should only vote one way.
Absolutely correct. Anyone saying that the Dems "haven't done anything" or aren't offering actual policies and bills are just ignoring reality.

Many of these things are true. They also only require a minor course correction to remedy - A good Dem President along with a solid blue Congress. Obama had his chance (briefly) and waffled in favor of attempting to work across the aisle, at a time when McConnell and others were plotting to bring him down. The next Dem President should start slinging major bills from day one.

The problem will be there is just SOOO much that needs tackling. Healthcare, Federal police reform. We have to get back in trade deals and good diplomatic relations with all our allies who think we are nuts and dysfunctional after Trump.
And you will have every GOP right wing hypocrites who ignored and made excuse for anything Trump did shouting from the rooftops day 1. Democrats will have to be in campiagn mode for midterms from the start as it will be exceedingly difficult to keep a majority. Lose it at midterms we have another Obama term where GOP block any progress
 
Last edited:
Many of these things are true. They also only require a minor course correction to remedy - A good Dem President along with a solid blue Congress. Obama had his chance (briefly) and waffled in favor of attempting to work across the aisle, at a time when McConnell and others were plotting to bring him down. The next Dem President should start slinging major bills from day one.

I hope you are right and that in 5 years from now, that massive ship that is the US, has corrected its course.
 
Absolutely correct. Anyone saying that the Dems "haven't done anything" or aren't offering actual policies and bills are just ignoring reality.



The problem will be there is just SOOO much that needs tackling. Healthcare, Federal police reform. We have to get back in trade deals and good diplomatic relations with all our allies who think we are nuts and dysfunctional after Trump.
And you will have every GOP right wing hypocrites who ignored and made excuse for anything Trump did shouting from the rooftops day 1. Democrats will have to be in campiagn mode for midterms from the start as it will be exceedingly difficult to keep a majority. Lose it at midterms we have another Obama term where GOP block any progress

Healthcare would seem one of the bigger priorities. If he somehow manages to reduce the medicare age to 60, renegotiate prescription pricing and and install a public option, it will be viewed as a success. He would need a blue Congress to get there though.
 
Healthcare would seem one of the bigger priorities. If he somehow manages to reduce the medicare age to 60, renegotiate prescription pricing and and install a public option, it will be viewed as a success. He would need a blue Congress to get there though.
they're going to lower medicare to 60 and throw a few scraps at the under 60s that will be immediately and wilfully broken by the private health sector professionals they hire to write the bills in the first place, and this is the best case scenario if the dems win everything
 
they're going to lower medicare to 60 and throw a few scraps at the under 60s that will be immediately and wilfully broken by the private health sector professionals they hire to write the bills in the first place, and this is the best case scenario if the dems win everything

The road to Medicare 4 All will have to happen in stages unfortunately. If he manages to get a public option through, that would be a significant step in the right direction.

https://www.vox.com/2019/7/16/20694598/joe-biden-health-care-plan-public-option
 
I know you have a particular distaste for such discussions, but worth noting for others that the Democratic-led congress has passed over 400 bills since taking power in 2018, but that Mitch has held over 300 up in the senate, because he refuses to allow anything to happen except Republican judges, because presumably some minority stole his lunch money when was a younger turtle. Note 275 of those stalled bills were passed in the house with bipartisan support.

A few things in these bills:
- Raise minimum wage, and ensure women are raised to equality
- Cut taxes for Gold Star families
- Protect the ACA, including pre-existing conditions, and increasing sign-up periods and access
- Several gun restriction bills
- Several vets bills
- Reauthourisation of the violence against women act

And so forth.

The narrative that 'both sides are as bad as the other' was planned, written and executed by Newt in his hopes of reducing partisan politics into pure nihilism, and many posters on here seem to have embraced it.

Both sides are not nearly as bad as each other. The dems are far from perfect, but my God if you care about health, the environment, education, income redistribution, racial inequality, LGBT rights or just about not having Jared f*cking Kushner as the head of everything you should only vote one way.
You speak wisdom always in this thread. Of course, the reply is gonna be that Biden once kicked a cat when he was young, so he's worse than Satan.
 
The road to Medicare 4 All will have to happen in stages unfortunately. If he manages to get a public option through, that would be a significant step in the right direction.

https://www.vox.com/2019/7/16/20694598/joe-biden-health-care-plan-public-option
why would you believe this? you're clearly not a moron and you've seen this over and over, you saw obama and biden in 2008 onwards and their complete abdication of their healthcare rhetoric and promises in favour of the market and you still believe it? why? why would think they're going to do as they've been saying for years and decades and not do as they've done for years and decades?
 
why would you believe this? you're clearly not a moron and you've seen this over and over, you saw obama and biden in 2008 onwards and their complete abdication of their rhetoric in favour of the market and you still believe it? why?

Its all about getting the right combination of President and Congress in place. Obviously none of this would work if the R's keep the Senate.
 
Its all about getting the right combination of President and Congress in place. Obviously none of this would work if the R's keep the Senate.
none of this would work if the democrats won the senate, it's joe biden, he's a corporate shill with half a dozen braincells left, he ran a more progressive campaign with obama in 2008 that won one of the biggest supermajorities in my lifetime and they let the private sector write their legislation, they didn't even attempt the universal coverage they promissed. what makes you think they've changed? is joe biden taking less money from health insurance companies? is the dnc? has he suddenly pivoted from his lifelong work as a corporate whore? has joe biden done a single, solitary thing in his decades on this planet to inspire this faith?
 
none of this would work if the democrats won the senate, it's joe biden, he's a corporate shill with half a dozen braincells left, he ran a more progressive campaign with obama in 2008 that won one of the biggest supermajorities in my lifetime and they let the private sector write their legislation, they didn't even attempt the universal coverage they promissed. what makes you think they've changed? is joe biden taking less money from health insurance companies? is the dnc? has he suddenly pivoted from his lifelong work as a corporate whore? has joe biden done a single, solitary thing in his decades on this planet to inspire this faith?

Ultimately, Biden - like all other candidates - have a platform they are running on and will be held accountable by the voters if he fails. As was pointed out earlier, the Dems have been blocked by Republican tactics of late. Having a President who shares the same policies will make a massive difference.
 
Ultimately, Biden - like all other candidates - have a platform they are running on and will be held accountable by the voters if he fails. As was pointed out earlier, the Dems have been blocked by Republican tactics of late. Having a President who shares the same policies will make a massive difference.
he's already said he's only running for one term and won't care about any judgement beyond his portrait on the wall. but i still don't get why would you put this level of faith in a politician who has spent their life doing the opposite of you want him to do just because he's, yet again, promising things he has offered before and didn't deliver? if you want to hold him accountable, why not hold him accountable for his career so far where he's been shit. half his campaign has been targeted at republicans with an implicit "we're not the commies you're worried about, we're friends with Lindsey and summer with the Bushes". you know all of this, you know joe biden has spent his entire career not doing this, he's always side with the corporations over the people, why do you still keep presenting him as though he'll be any different now?
 
he's already said he's only running for one term and won't care about any judgement beyond his portrait on the wall. but i still don't get why would you put this level of faith in a politician who has spent their life doing the opposite of you want him to do just because he's, yet again, promising things he has offered before and didn't deliver? if you want to hold him accountable, why not hold him accountable for his career so far where he's been shit. half his campaign has been targeted at republicans with an implicit "we're not the commies you're worried about, we're friends with Lindsey and summer with the Bushes". you know all of this, you know joe biden has spent his entire career not doing this, why do you still keep presenting him as though he will?

I don't place any particular special faith in Biden. My point is the Dems under Biden and a Dem Congress, will be able to implement their agenda. That's a massive difference from not being able to do so on a wide range of policy issues - healthcare, environment, criminal justice reform, supreme court, foreign policy etc. It simply boils down to having the flexibility to implement their agenda, as opposed to spending 4 years doing nothing because McConnell has decided to block everything.
 
Black lawmakers rally behind Engel in primary fight


Powerful Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) members are rallying behind longtime Rep. Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.) as he fends off a tough primary challenge from a progressive African American candidate, Jamaal Bowman.

Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-S.C.), whose endorsement helped propel Joe Biden to the presidential nomination, and Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), the caucus chairman seen as the heir apparent to Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-N.Y.), threw their support behind Engel, a pro-Israel Jewish American and 16-term House veteran, over the weekend.

So has the influential House Financial Services Committee chairwoman, Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), and the CBC’s political action committee, led by another powerful New York Democrat, Rep. Greg Meeks, the Queens party boss. Engel also is backed by Carl Heastie, the first black Speaker of the New York state Assembly whose Bronx district overlaps with Engel’s.

Black Democrats are not criticizing Bowman, whose campaign has tapped into the national anger over police brutality and institutional racism that has inspired tens of thousands of protesters to take to the streets of New York and other U.S. cities in recent weeks.

In fact, many have praised the 44-year-old public education advocate — raised by a single mother in East Harlem before founding his own public middle school, where he remains the principal.

The CBC endorsements of Engel are more a reflection of an unspoken rule on Capitol Hill: Establishment Democrats, including most members of the Black Caucus, tend to put aside other considerations — age, race, region, ideology — and protect their own from outside challenges.

That formula — prioritizing incumbency and seniority — has paid handsome dividends for the CBC, helping the group to accumulate power in the halls of Congress. Indeed, CBC members now hold gavels on four key committees, including Financial Services, Homeland Security and Education and Labor.

CBC voices are also pointing to another reason for siding with Engel: He was there fighting for racial justice in law enforcement, they note, long before the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis sparked the current outcry for a criminal justice overhaul. Engel joined CBC members in a meeting with Justice Department officials after the 1999 killing of Amadou Diallo, an unarmed black man who was shot 19 times by four white New York City police officers. And Engel spoke out prominently against the 2014 death of Eric Garner, who died on Staten Island after an officer put him in a chokehold.

“Eliot Engel has been with us every step of the way on police brutality, on criminal justice reform. You can’t turn your back on your friend just because your friendship has become inconvenient,” said one black Democratic source familiar with the primary.

“It’s less about Bowman and more about your friend who has been shoulder to shoulder with you through your struggle,” the source said. “That’s why you see all these CBC members coming out in support. He was there with us on all these NYPD abuse cases.”

In a statement, Bowman suggested he was unfazed by the establishment Democrats lining up behind Engel. The political upstart outraised the incumbent congressman during the last couple months, though Engel, the chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee, is sitting on a bigger bank balance.

“I understand that senior members of Congress tend to endorse other senior members of Congress,” Bowman told The Hill, “but frankly I'm not concerned about those endorsements because we're seeing so much energy in the district for fundamental change."

CBC members are “missing a great opportunity to embrace a new generation of leadership in the party during this historic moment,” added Waleed Shahid of the progressive outside group Justice Democrats, which recruited Bowman to run.

Engel’s 16th District, which includes working-class neighborhoods in the Bronx and wealthier ZIP codes in south Westchester County, is a majority-minority district, where blacks and Hispanics outnumber whites.

The June 23 primary contest offers a snapshot of a small but high-profile rift within the Democratic Caucus, the most diverse in the history of Congress, which features one of the largest — and youngest — freshman classes in the party’s history. While Democratic leaders and committee chairmen have consolidated power for years, there’s another group of young liberals clamoring for changes within the ranks — even if it means fighting for the ouster of their own colleagues.

Leading that charge has been Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), the liberal firebrand and social media superstar known as AOC who has had no qualms about endorsing progressive primary challengers pitted against more moderate sitting Democrats. In backing Bowman earlier this month, she suggested the national unrest after Floyd’s death at the hands of the police demands new ideas — and new voices — on Capitol Hill.

“This moment requires renewed and revitalized leadership across the country AND at the ballot box,” tweeted Ocasio-Cortez, who ousted the powerful House Democratic Caucus chairman, Rep. Joseph Crowley (D-N.Y.), in a primary two years ago that rocked Washington and the Democratic establishment.

Lending a further boost to Bowman, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) threw his significant weight behind Engel’s challenger this month, followed shortly thereafter by an endorsement from The New York Times editorial page, which cited several missteps by Engel.

Engel, 73, has come under fire for remaining outside the district, at a residence in Potomac, Md., during the earlier stages of the coronavirus pandemic, which hit parts of his district particularly hard. More recently, Engel was caught on a hot mic asking to speak at a public event in New York decrying police brutality. The reason, he suggested, was to raise his profile amid the tough challenge.

“If I didn’t have a primary,” he said, “I wouldn’t care.”

On Monday, yet another freshman Democrat, Rep. Katie Porter (Calif.), also endorsed Bowman, citing his outsider status and vows to shake up business as usual on Capitol Hill.

“He’ll come to Congress ready to take on corporate executives, not hit them up for donations,” she said.

Despite a handful of detractors, however, Engel has other Democratic heavy-hitters in his corner. When recently asked what she thought of AOC backing Bowman over her longtime ally, Engel, Pelosi said she was endorsing both Engel and AOC in their reelection bids next week.

“I think the people of New York are very blessed to have them both in the Congress,” Pelosi said.

Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) a progressive favorite after leading the effort to impeach President Trump, also endorsed Engel, as have two fellow New York Democrats, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand and Rep. Grace Meng, a leading Asian American lawmaker who is a top official at the Democratic National Committee.


Notably, the other Democratic New York senator, Minority Leader Charles Schumer, has remained neutral in the Engel-Bowman race, saying he’s “focused on the Senate.” Some have viewed his neutrality as Schumer not wanting to upset progressives amid chatter about AOC potentially challenging the Democratic leader in 2022.

But sources said Schumer and other senior Democrats could officially endorse Engel in the coming days.

“We need leaders in Congress with proven records of standing up for civil & human rights,” Clyburn tweeted on Monday. “@RepEliotEngel is not new to the fight for justice & equality — he’s been in the fight for his entire life & I’ve worked w/ him on these issues for almost 3 decades.”

This is how much they hate and fear Progressives. As for the CBC they can feck off ,no more than corrupt puppets for the establishment.
 
Black lawmakers rally behind Engel in primary fight




This is how much they hate and fear Progressives. As for the CBC they can feck off ,no more than corrupt puppets for the establishment.

I’m not sure this is in any way a surprise. Dems want politicians who support the Dem platform in Congress.
 
I know you have a particular distaste for such discussions, but worth noting for others that the Democratic-led congress has passed over 400 bills since taking power in 2018, but that Mitch has held over 300 up in the senate, because he refuses to allow anything to happen except Republican judges, because presumably some minority stole his lunch money when was a younger turtle. Note 275 of those stalled bills were passed in the house with bipartisan support.

A few things in these bills:
- Raise minimum wage, and ensure women are raised to equality
- Cut taxes for Gold Star families
- Protect the ACA, including pre-existing conditions, and increasing sign-up periods and access
- Several gun restriction bills
- Several vets bills
- Reauthourisation of the violence against women act

@Revan too


I could give a spiel about symbolism and how when push comes to shove, the House Dems will go with their donors. I could talk about the empty-headed naivete of believing what obviously-bad actors want you to believe.
But instead of talking in abstract here are examples of the Dem party being a rational actor guided by its funding sources, putting forward things when they cannot pass and retreating from them the moment it looks likely.

1. In 2006 there was a massive anti-Bush Democrat wave. They gained control of the House with "far-left San Fransisco values" Pelosi as speaker. On the 1st of March 2007, just 2 months after getting power, the House passed card check, allowing much easier unionisation, fulfilling a 30-year union demand. The bill passed the House easily (same link as before) but failed in the senate.
In 2008, they increased their House majority, got 60 in the senate, and most importantly, had a progressive Democratic president. The bill was re-introduced in the House - and stayed there. Never even made it to the senate, even though there were more Democrats in the House now, and even though the president included card check as a campaign promise. Biden signaled in Jan 2009 (same link) that card check would be done later. It was never even introduced to the House after that.
Today, there is no card check and union density continues to decline.

2. The previous governor of New Jersey was Republican Chris Christie. He dealt with a Democratic legislature. The legislature passed a tax on millionaires 5 separate times while he was governor. Christie was beaten in 2018 by Phil Murphy who campaigned on the same tax.
5 months after his election, the NJ state senate president (D) said: "This state is taxed out. If you know anything about New Jersey, they’re just weary of the taxes." (The same taxes they had camapigned on and won a landslide.) The governor never referred to it.
Today, there is no millionaire tax in NJ, and school fnding will be cut to make up the budget shortfall this year.
Source.

3. In October 2009, Democratic Sen. Rockerfeller said: "I will not relent on [the public option]. That's the only way to go."
In February 2010, it was realised that Obamacare was going to be passed by reconciliation, which meant the 60-vote filibuster barrier no longer existed. Everything, including the public option - which his president had campaigned on - was on the table. There was a comfortable House majority, and a bill with the public option had passed the House multiple times since 2007.
However, the final proposal from Obama did not include a public option. People who value others' lives wondered if it might be added to the bill, and turned to Senator Rockerfeller for his "unrelenting" support.
His reply, 5 months after the previous statement, "I don't think the timing of it is very good, I'm probably not going to vote for that." During reconciliation, the public option was removed from the House bill by the Democratic senate.
This article by the centrist golden boy Ezra Klein reports that many senators publicly supporting the public option privately opposed it, and the WH was "sharply resistant" to it. Ezra calls it "strange politics", but that's because he doesn't understand how politics works.
Today, there is no public option, people die because of lack of insurance, and Obama's VP is campaigning on it 12 years later after he campaigned on it and won.


4. All these are examples of Democrats making mild populist appeals during the campaign, when out of power, or when there was no chance of it passing, and retreating the moment they get in power or find broader support. Now here is a case where they retreated even before they got in power, just because the idea became politically plausible because of the upcoming preidential election.
Medicare For All grew from 25 sponsors in 2003 to 120 in 2017. The big blue wave of 2018 put in about 40 new Democrats in the House!
And the number of M4A consponsors *fell* to 116, which means as a proportion it went from 62% of the party to under 50%. All of the senate bill cosponsors famously ran away from the bill the moment they became presidential contenders, not even waiting to win for the inevitable betrayal.
Today, both presidential candidates have vowed to oppose any M4A bill that comes to their desk.
 
Last edited:
The Democratic party - the lawmakers, lobbyists, and think tanks that make up its core - have funding and cultural links with Silicon Valley, Wall Street, Hollywood, universities, CNN/NBC, the healthcare industry, defence contractors, and unions.
The Republican party has the same with the fossil fuel industry, Wall Street, the healthcare industry, defence contractors, the agricultural industry, manufcaturing generally, the NRA, Fox, Evengelical churches, and the Chamber of Commerce and its local affiliates.

Of course there is also cross-talk. Some Silicon ValleyXGOP action, and a lot of Dems close to the fossil fuel industry.

Those are the opposing coalitions, and the candidate will be the agent of those interests.
 
Last edited:
I’m not sure this is in any way a surprise. Dems want politicians who support the Dem platform in Congress.

I felt it was an interesting test of the CBC's limits. Is it over the line for the Congressional Black Caucus for you to publicly say that you're at a Black Lives Matter event only because you have a primary? No, it is not.
I am curious where the limits are. I think there are none, because inconvenient things, like Hillary saying All Lives Matter and then refusing to answer if Black Lives Matter, are quickly memory-holed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.