Silva
Full Member
nvm it should definitely be Bloomberg. embrace the wholesale corruption head on.
Wouldn’t it be Bloomberg or Mayor Pete?
It would come down to the DNC, who would obviously choose an appropriate centrist replacement who supports Biden's positions to reflect him beating all other candidates in terms of delegates.
Wouldn’t it be Bloomberg or Mayor Pete?
I think if Biden were to drop out for any reason, the pressure to pick Sanders would be immense. If people are afraid that Bernie voters are going to stay out of the election with Biden was the nominee, they haven't seen anything yet.
It would be from Sanders supporters, but not from a majority of Dems nor the party hierarchy, who are the ones who would actually make the selection.
Wait, how do the mechanics of that work? I guess I could research it, but after the headache from delving into Constitutional law about what happens if we don’t have an election I don’t have the stomach for it at the moment.
We keep getting into the specter of uncharted territory.
He would be a corpse before you could say Clinton 2020Beto: ‘So you’re telling me there’s a chance...’
Thanks, I just lost my appetite for the rest of the day. I had forgotten about her for awhile...He would be a corpse before you could say Clinton 2020
I believe that Bernie's supporters (most of them anyway) would vote for Biden. However, if Biden withdraws, and the party nominees someone who is not Bernie, then some of them might decide to stay home.There are multiple scenarios in terms of if the candidate gets sick, dies, or has to withdraw before the actual nomination. The conventional wisdom is that the party and/or its superdelegates would pick the replacement, so there's a very good chance that would be a regular Democrat and not a lefty. The other scenarios involving an already nominated candidate dropping out would be a bit murkier.
Whilst voting in somebody who isn't even in the democratic party and has lost to both clinton and biden would somehow be good for party unity?I believe that Bernie's supporters (most of them anyway) would vote for Biden. However, if Biden withdraws, and the party nominees someone who is not Bernie, then some of them might decide to stay home.
If Biden withdraws, I think the best thing would be to nominate Bernie for party's unity. Nominating someone who got significantly less votes than him (or wasn't in the election at all) might be very dangerous.
I believe that Bernie's supporters (most of them anyway) would vote for Biden. However, if Biden withdraws, and the party nominees someone who is not Bernie, then some of them might decide to stay home.
If Biden withdraws, I think the best thing would be to nominate Bernie for party's unity. Nominating someone who got significantly less votes than him (or wasn't in the election at all) might be very dangerous.
That's only on name though. Bernie has caucused for Democrats in all his career and has been a very reliable vote both in the congress and in the senate.Whilst voting in somebody who isn't even in the democratic party and has lost to both clinton and biden would somehow be good for party unity?
Not sure what the best solution is but it's not Bernie for the majority of democrats... hence he lost and lost again
With Biden out, Bernie is the candidate with most votes (by far). I am not saying that he should be the nominee cause I like him (which obviously, I do), but because it would be the fairest thing in that situation. Fairness brings unity (I think more Sanders voters will vote Biden than they did for Hillary).That's entirely possible and the same could be said of the opposite scenario where a lot of ordinary Democrats stay home if Sanders were to be the nominee, so there wouldn't be any benefit for the Dems to go that route. So there wouldn't be unity in either case.
That's only on name though. Bernie has caucused for Democrats in all his career and has been a very reliable vote both in the congress and in the senate.
With Biden out, Bernie is the candidate with most votes (by far). I am not saying that he should be the nominee cause I like him (which obviously, I do), but because it would be the fairest thing in that situation. Fairness brings unity (I think more Sanders voters will vote Biden than they did for Hillary).
I guess it is a fair point of view (yours) too, so I guess different people will see it differently. If Bernie doesn't endorse some arbitrary Democrat choice, then it could cause a lot of problems.I don't think it would be viewed as particularly fair given that he has starkly different policies than Biden (many of which I agree with). What would be more fair is the will of the voters who voted for Biden actually being recognized by way of a replacement who closely resembles Biden's policies and general centrist demeanor. There's no magic rule that says if the winner has to drop out, that the 2nd automatically gets the nomination because they were second. That may make a lot of sense at first glance, but not when you factor in that most Democrats didn't vote for progressive policies in the Sanders or even Warren mold. Far more voted for a combination of Biden, Pete, Klobuchar, Bloomberg et al, so that would be a primary consideration when selecting a replacement, especially given what's at stake in November.
The fecks going on?
We’ve feck all to do, so we’re meandering around on what would happen if Biden drops out (which he won’t...spoiler alert).The fecks going on?
Im trying to work out the same. Is there actually talk of removing Biden over this allegation or is it a discussion limited to this thread?
No. These are just "what if" type questions.
One loon...why even post that? Is she a VP candidate or something?not a good look from the biden bros
There’s always something better to do than retweet racist assholes from Indiana.i have a lot of free time at the moment
I thought they wanted to defeat Trump at any cost? or was it something to just scapegoat Bernie supporters?That's entirely possible and the same could be said of the opposite scenario where a lot of ordinary Democrats stay home if Sanders were to be the nominee, so there wouldn't be any benefit for the Dems to go that route. So there wouldn't be unity in either case.
I thought they wanted to defeat Trump at any cost? or was it something to just scapegoat Bernie supporters?
I was talking from your initial pov of if Bernie was chosen.If the primary results are any indicator, most of them do want to beat Trump, but a good portion of them don't think Sanders would be viable. This is why the DNC and SuperDelegates would choose a replacement who reflects policies more in line with Obama/Biden.
I'm sure a lot would still turn out for Bernie. Unfortunately, the power and center of voter mass in the Dem party is still in the old Obama coalition crowd, so even if a small amount don't show up it would kill his chances. The same can't be said of Biden - if a small amount of progressives don't show up, he can still win because he has a better chance of carrying the rust belt states.I was talking from your initial pov of if Bernie was chosen.
Neither of them represents my priorities in any fashion.The only question you can ask on election day (in a two party system) is if you believe candidate x will best represent your priorities over candidate y. There is no realistic third option.
Kinda/sorta but also no. It will take much more than a mere 2nd Trump term. And what it would take — not even sure right now.Maybe you believe that another four years of Trump will finally push the US towards the correction it needs - I can understand that logic - but a straight choice between Biden and Trump just seems obvious if you have any progressive leanings whatsoever, and equating the two is juvenile.
If Bernie had won, you can bet alot of centrists would stay home or even vote for Trump.I was talking from your initial pov of if Bernie was chosen.
If Bernie had won, you can bet alot of centrists would stay home or even vote for Trump.
If Bernie had won, you can bet alot of centrists would stay home or even vote for Trump.