Just don't mention the drones
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jul/14/obama-secret-kill-list-disposition-matrix
Why is the media, the Democratic party establishment and all the rich people like Warren Buffet, Bloomberg, Goldman Sachs CEO etc trying to bring down Bernie Sanders?
very trumpy
Funny that he mentions this, Rick Tyler rhymes with Dick Eater in the very same fashion.
The idea was that both are not really rhymesIt does? What am I missing?
I bet he was. Saw a clip with Al Sharpton saying the same thing . He said vetting him now would stop him being targeted by Republican ads in the general if he was nominated.Scarborough and his crew were bricking it this morning - as if Sanders has never been "vetted" in the past. Anyone who grew up in the US with a mild interest in politics has known about him for decades and its not as if he wasn't comprehensively covered in 2015/16.
1) Not necessarily true. He couldn't do anything to Collins (voted for witnesses and against the repeal of Obamacare), Murkowski (against repeal of Obamacare and against Kavanaugh) for example. Romney voted to remove him and now Trump in Utah has the biggest difference in disapproval rate from the time he became president in any state. Finally, Jeff Flake retired cause of fear of primaried, and what happened next? The Democrats flipped the seat.None of that means that Democrats who continue going against their own voting base on policy won't be in danger because of that. Just like how Republicans who dared to criticise Trump about anything are losing elections all over the place because, entirely unsurprisingly, the core Rep voters love Trump.
very trumpy
Who gives a feck about an opinion on Castro in 2020?
are you even being serious with this point?1) Not necessarily true. He couldn't do anything to Collins (voted for witnesses and against the repeal of Obamacare), Murkowski (against repeal of Obamacare and against Kavanaugh) for example. Romney voted to remove him and now Trump in Utah has the biggest difference in disapproval rate from the time he became president in any state. Finally, Jeff Flake retired cause of fear of primaried, and what happened next? The Democrats flipped the seat.
2) Trump is way more popular than Sanders. At this time of election, Trump was polling 33-35%, while Sanders is getting 25%.
Who gives a feck about an opinion on Castro in 2020?
I suppose some of the 1.5m Cuban Americans living in Florida might.
https://www.nbcmiami.com/news/local...s-bernie-sanders-over-castro-comment/2195381/
Definitely worth it if you're trying to win Florida.So a minor local issue with a niche group. Hardly worth national discussion.
Just circulate the feck out of the Obama video saying exactly the same.
It’s not the older Cubans who internalize that propaganda that’s a worry in Florida, it’s the retirees and ex-Midwesterners in exurban areas who were decisive for Trump in 16 and Rick Scott in 18. Contrary to common wisdom, Clinton did run by traditional metrics an excellent organisation there and drove turn out as much as possible, but that new pool of voters were a big problem. I don’t think there’s enough votes in Broward and Miami-Dade to overcome that if inroads can’t be made into that community. There are also the ex-felons who are now eligible to vote but we simply don’t know enough to gauge their voting behaviour.
Yes. At this stage of Republican primaries (in 2016) Trump was polling 8-10 points higher than Sanders is polling now. So, he was more popular with the Republicans then, than Sanders is with Democrats now. So, unless Sanders will reach the same popularity as Trump, he won't be able to threaten Democrat incumbents who vote against him.are you even being serious with this point?
Definitely worth it if you're trying to win Florida.
I’d be surprised if Sanders wins FL in a gen election. Far too many groups who tend to swing conservative to moderate in the state at the moment.
I’d be surprised if Sanders wins FL in a gen election. Far too many groups who tend to swing conservative to moderate in the state at the moment.
Better to target Texas for those electoral votes and feck Florida off.
RCP poll average is 29.3% for Sanders right now; it was 33.6% for Trump on the same day four years ago. Not exactly a landslide of a difference - and of course that's not taking into account the fact that it's utterly pointless to compare the two situations four years apart, with very different competitors and issues.2) Trump is way more popular than Sanders. At this time of election, Trump was polling 33-35%, while Sanders is getting 25%.
For the general election, it won't matter, Trump is gonna win Florida in any case, so Dems need to go all-in for Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin in order to have a path to victory.
No Democrat is winning it (this cycle). The path to victory for Dems is to win all states Hillary won, and then Pennsylvania and Michigan.Sanders is not winning Texas.
I know, but still. They won both the gubernatorial and senate race 1 year ago, and Trump won it comfortably in 2016. It has been going red since 2008.The newer generation of younger Cubans tend to be more open to progressives. The trouble with FL is it’s basically a southern state, so to win it , you have to have massive Dem turnout in Dade, Broward, and PB. These are all establishment Dem strongholds, so for someone like Sanders to do well he would have to have an unusually strong showing there.
No Democrat is winning it (this cycle). The path to victory for Dems is to win all states Hillary won, and then Pennsylvania and Michigan.
Thanks for correction, it seems that it has gone up the last week (especially after NV caucus). It is still not as strong as Trump numbers this time 4 years ago though.RCP poll average is 29.3% for Sanders right now; it was 33.6% for Trump on the same day four years ago. Not exactly a landslide of a difference - and of course that's not taking into account the fact that it's utterly pointless to compare the two situations four years apart, with very different competitors and issues.
By about a 100k votes - 1.2%. That's not what I'd call comfortable. I mean, compared to 2000 it certainly is but surely that can't be the benchmark.I know, but still. They won both the gubernatorial and senate race 1 year ago, and Trump won it comfortably in 2016. It has been going red since 2008.
Sanders can win WI, PA,MI and flip NC with a wave election.
AZ is probable too.
He wont need TX and FL.
Pennsylvania and Michigan have 36 votes, right? Remove 36 from Trump's 304 and he reaches only 268, which gives the victory to Dems.I agree. Actually your last statement is only partially correct, the Dems would have to pick up one more state to win the election on top of Pennsylvania and Michigan. Potential pick up states include AZ, FL, WI, NC, maybe IA if Sanders gets the nomination.
Pennsylvania and Michigan have 36 votes, right? Remove 36 from Trump's 304 and he reaches only 268, which gives the victory to Dems.
* I might be wrong
Pennsylvania and Michigan have 36 votes, right? Remove 36 from Trump's 304 and he reaches only 268, which gives the victory to Dems.
* I might be wrong