entropy
Full Member
year of the pizza rat
But Biden told us Electability.
Nor Sanders Warren or Bloomberg...Neither Biden nor Buttchug are electable.
Yeah. Buttigieg would be a lamb to the slaughter .Neither Biden nor Buttchug are electable.
Nor Sanders Warren or Bloomberg...
Just let trump declare himself emperor and Don jnr / Ivanka can fight over who is next in line
Yeah. Buttigieg would be a lamb to the slaughter .
It’s not really far fetched for the DNC to do what they can to make it difficult for Bernie. We have Hillary and Buttigieg people directly implicated in the company that developed the app if sources are to be believed.
Hopefully Biden gets the feck out after this
Interesting that he seems to be almost everyone's second choice.Pete barely winning won't mean much in states that aren't so lopsidedly white.
If he takes a decent chunk of the white people in those states that were planning on voting for Biden that'll mean quite a lot.Pete barely winning won't mean much in states that aren't so lopsidedly white.
In a state generally considered quite progressive the candidates who you might see as progressive (Biden Warren Yang) got 44.5% of the delegatesIf he takes a decent chunk of the white people in those states that were planning on voting for Biden that'll mean quite a lot.
What policies are people interested in?
https://news.gallup.com/poll/1675/most-important-problem.aspxWhat policies are people interested in?
Biden's had an abysmal start and his popularity is based on the idea that he's electable. Pete doesn't get black votes. You seem quite keen on the idea that Bloomberg can win this but other than 'he has lotsa money' I'm not sure why.In a state generally considered quite progressive the candidates who you might see as progressive (Biden Warren Yang) got 44.5% of the delegates
They will probably get less in a number of other states
I'm not sure which white man the moderates will get behind in the end but I think Biden Bloomberg and Pete will feel pretty positive based on those figures
https://www.thedailybeast.com/inves...hadow-the-firm-behind-iowa-caucus-clusterfeck
I honestly can't see what bloombergs strategy is... But if he's spending literally billions of dollars I assume he has one?Biden's had an abysmal start and his popularity is based on the idea that he's electable. Pete doesn't get black votes. You seem quite keen on the idea that Bloomberg can win this but other than 'he has lotsa money' I'm not sure why.
Some of the ones you espouse in all likelihood but not all.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/1675/most-important-problem.aspxRanking.
In Iowa it was Health Care and Climate Change Tops.
Nationally that would be similar.
Also living Wages.
Biden's had an abysmal start and his popularity is based on the idea that he's electable. Pete doesn't get black votes. You seem quite keen on the idea that Bloomberg can win this but other than 'he has lotsa money' I'm not sure why.
And you said nationally it would be similar which the poll refutesIowa voters stated Health Care and Climate Change.
And you said nationally it would be similar which the poll refutes
To be fair that latter point is probably more important than one would initially think. Trump has a ton of money in the bank from a campaign perspective.
Exactly.I don't see what's so attractive about Pete, if there was such a thing as a random politician generator, he'd be the kind of result you'd get.
I think the words you looking for areWhat were the issues being debated in the various debates you saw?
I think the words you looking for are
Fek... Your right... Leadership and immigration seem to poll higher
And only 4% think it's environmental issues and 2% think it's the gap in wages... Fek I was wrong... Hth
I don't see what's so attractive about Pete, if there was such a thing as a random politician generator, he'd be the kind of result you'd get.
just saw the results
bernie wins 1st and 2nd alignment, pete wins the delegates
just another little coincidence, incompetence, that should be ignored by the bros. these things all somehow fall one way but no non no never analyse them as a whole.