Red Dreams
Full Member
Christ almighty!
Sam Stein works for MSNBC right?
Christ almighty!
Also these kinds of arguments are usually flawed. Someone may oppose a bill because there's an amendment slipped in that's disagreeable, or because of a small aspect that they're not happy with but it doesn't mean they oppose the reason for the bill. You could have a bill that looks to protect abortion rejected by a progressive because they support the aim of the bill absolutely but there's an amendment in there that says that the mother is entitled to less care/rights than they think is fair. That then gets packaged as 'ThiS PeRsON SaYs ThEYrE AgAinSt AbORtIoN BuT YeT VotEd to MaKE It iLleGal' without anyone putting any actual thought into it. Too many people taking things at face value, black and white, simplistic and then construct narratives around some kind of technicality and they offer nothing to the debate.
The question should just be 'Kamala, can you explain what made you vote against this bill at the time?'
It's not enough to say the right things when you entire career is doing the opposite.
It's also not enough to jump to conclusions, when you can just ask questions that either prove your narrative, or dispel it.
I'm also not making any comment on Kamala's career, I don't know enough about it. I'm just commenting on the fallacy of 'this person said X but because they voted against this bill that must be wrong'.
It's not jumping to conclusions if her entire career has been about punishing disadvantaged people for her own gain. Its painstakingly realizing this is who she is and always has been.
You talking about Ben Cohen?
He’s been supporting Bernie for about 40 years now.
jc fishy. My first post wasn't even supposed to be "denigrating". I had a geunine qs about it, which you responded to like a man personally attacked.fecking idiotic that we have to denigrate a good pledge because Sanders didn't say it because obviously anyone who is not Sanders can't mean anything they say.
There is an actual conflict on interest with Bernie campaign .
props to her for calling out a common bipartisan practice.
It’s like they had a contest to see who could make the graph most likely to feck with the mind of the people looking at it.
Going back to what brought this up, now you see why I was alluding to how Bernie could have made the same declaration as Warren did. He’s got wealthy supporters too.As I said, taking time to explain this clearly, the problem is with him being on his committee. To use a twitter phrase - not a good look.
It’s like they had a contest to see who could make the graph most likely to feck with the mind of the people looking at it.
I feel like I’m viewing a Rorschach test.
Not their best work.It's not even the full thing, it's just the Biden section. Really criminal lack of colours.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/democratic-debate-poll/
Not their best work.
I liked what she said about corruption and Donors, and about all these ideas will not mean much until there is clean politics. Only her and Elizabeth Warren as mentioned the words Corruption.Gillibrand was just awkward. Would just butt in and say nothing of substance for the most part
Not their best work.
Not Norma? That's the resemblance I see.That’s awesome. I can see the log lady resemblance.
Is it just me or is that incredibly confusing? Also, has there been two debates already? When was the 1st debate?
Part 1 that happened the night beforeIs it just me or is that incredibly confusing? Also, has there been two debates already? When was the 1st debate?
There were two nights, so debate 1 was the first night, debate 2 the second. So they've tracked movements after each night.Is it just me or is that incredibly confusing? Also, has there been two debates already? When was the 1st debate?
It's not even the full thing, it's just the Biden section. Really criminal lack of colours.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/democratic-debate-poll/
Yes it does and I agree. I really want this field to get reduced quickly so we can see Warren on stage with the other main contenders. She was basically by herself in that regard on the 1st night.@Carolina Red @Ubik Cheers. What I took away from that interactive graphic is how being on the 1st night might ultimately have been a disadvantage for Warren. She went from 18% to 14.4% after the 2nd night. Also shows how short people's attention spans are.
Saw this earlier. Wish they had tried some colours to make it clearer but I guess the upshot is Biden took a massive hit, it mostly went ot Kamala, and Warren a little bit, and Bernie has the most loyal base who will support him if he shoots a man on 5th Avenue
@Carolina Red @Ubik Cheers. What I took away from that interactive graphic is how being on the 1st night might ultimately have been a disadvantage for Warren. She went from 18% to 14.4% after the 2nd night. Also shows how short people's attention spans are.
I feel like I’m viewing a Rorschach test.
Who's spreading it?“Kamala Harris isn’t an African-American, so why does she call herself one” is the new meme making its rounds on social media.
Racist southerners on Facebook is where I saw it. My wife’s step-grandmother (is that a thing?) on her dad’s sideWho's spreading it?
Ah yes, racist southern whites: the true gatekeepers of the definition of African-American.Racist southerners on Facebook is where I saw it
She's Jamaican American“Kamala Harris isn’t an African-American, so why does she call herself one” is the new meme making its rounds on social media.
Yes. For people who don’t care about feelings, they sure get their feelings hurt every time a black politician does something.Ah yes, racist southern whites: the true gatekeepers of the definition of African-American.
I know. I don’t know that I’ve ever seen her call herself an African American. Maybe I missed it and they didn’t.She's Jamaican American
To be fair to its a weird one. She's definitely a black woman or at least half Black. African slaves were brought to Jamaica just like the USA. So obviously she has as much African heritage as any other black person in America, just that her ancestors cut sugar came instead of picking cotton.I know. I don’t know that I’ve ever seen her call herself an African American. Maybe I missed it and they didn’t.
She identifies as a black woman. And people have issue with that for some reason. Saying she's not black because she's from Jamaica which is just stupid. It's like saying John McCain isn't white because he's from GuamI know. I don’t know that I’ve ever seen her call herself an African American. Maybe I missed it and they didn’t.
PanamaShe identifies as a black woman. And people have issue with that for some reason. Saying she's not black because she's from Jamaica which is just stupid. It's like saying John McCain isn't white because he's fromGuam
It’s racism. Plain and simple.So I don't see what the hell people are on about.
Is that a step-parent's parent, or a parent's step parent? Or bothRacist southerners on Facebook is where I saw it. My wife’s step-grandmother (is that a thing?) on her dad’s side