2016 US Presidential Elections | Trump Wins

Status
Not open for further replies.
Whilst in terms of his hierarchy of flaws it's pretty low, it still massively irritates me when he refers to himself in the third person.
 
Drumpf live on Bill-O. Unbelievable how deluded he is. Everything is rigged, something's going on with the voting and the polls. He openly said that the only polls he likes or believes are the ones that have him winning, and he also said he won the third debate and every poll had him winning that. :wenger:

Also it was illegal for NBC to have the microphone on AND for them to release the tape and "we will see" when asked if he would take them to court. For fecks sake. :lol:

Oh and "there's something going on with Hillary's health" and you can hear Bill-O just laughing out loud at nearly everything Drumpf says, even he can't take him seriously anymore.
 
Last edited:
So, this was an actual post. Please pray for my country...


Complyin' Ted is holding down the voter fraud in Texas!

GXy4o69.jpg
 
GlastonSpur said:
Eh? I don't get this, far less how it's worse.

If 50% of the electorate don't vote, that means roughly 120m adults will vote (this assumes they're all eligible to vote, which they all won't be). If Trump gets 43% of their votes (the current RCP poll average), this means that only 52m Americans will have bought into him ... not the 150m you cited earlier.
Click to expand...

Because not voting could be the difference in Trump becoming the next president or not. So the 52 million (or slightly more for this hypothetical, because I'm talking about him winning) who vote for him and the 120m who don't vote will have collectively ensured he becomes president. Then you have over the 150 million that I was talking about earlier. That's why it's worse. I get voter apathy. There are a certain amount of people who won't vote in any country. However, if the prospect of Donald Trump being your next president doesn't scare you into voting, then you're as bad as the ones that do vote for him and part of the problem.
 
I'm starting to come around to the idea of another world war, it's time for a cull
 
cesc's_mullet said:
I'm starting to come around to the idea of another world war, it's time for a cull
Click to expand...

It's your sissy liberal ass that's gonna get culled :lol:

I've lost faith in lefties ever seizing power in a power vacuum. Let's hope the neoliberal corporatists remain sane enough to save our behinds.
 
InfiniteBoredom said:
It's your sissy liberal ass that's gonna get culled :lol:

I've lost faith in lefties ever seizing power in a power vacuum. Let's hope the neoliberal corporatists remain sane enough to save our behinds.
Click to expand...

Those are fighting words, let's post pictures of our muscles to decide who the sissiest is!
 
Silva said:
Click to expand...


Like the way Michael Moore comes off in that interview. Always remembered him being a snobby type for some reason, but this is quite the contrary. It's a shame that Trump supporters probably froth at the mouth upon hearing Michael Moore's name so won't pay any attention to what he says.
 
RexHamilton said:
Because not voting could be the difference in Trump becoming the next president or not. So the 52 million (or slightly more for this hypothetical, because I'm talking about him winning) who vote for him and the 120m who don't vote will have collectively ensured he becomes president. Then you have over the 150 million that I was talking about earlier. That's why it's worse. I get voter apathy. There are a certain amount of people who won't vote in any country. However, if the prospect of Donald Trump being your next president doesn't scare you into voting, then you're as bad as the ones that do vote for him and part of the problem.
Click to expand...

Careful what you wish for. Someone posted an article here a while back (possibly from 538?) that showed of those non-voters/never voted, the largest group among them was overwhelmingly non-educated whites who'd be obviously voting Trump, as they do among the voting population. It would utterly dwarf the Latino vote, for example.
 
http://edition.cnn.com/2016/10/27/politics/hillary-clinton-october-fundraising/index.html
Trump donates just $31K to campaign as Clinton builds massive cash advantage

Donald Trump is still refusing to donate significantly more money to his campaign, putting him at an overwhelming cash disadvantage to Hillary Clinton with less than two weeks to go before Election Day.

The GOP nominee -- despite frequent promises to contribute $100 million to his campaign by Election Day -- donated a measly $31,000 in early October, a fundraising report released Thursday shows. He has only donated $56 million to his race as of October 20 and has just $16 million in reserves.
Clinton, meanwhile, sits on $62 million as of October 20, meaning she could spend more than $3 million a day during the final two weeks of the election and not go broke.
Clinton has also personally outspent Trump in early October, donating more than $50,000 to her campaign from her own funds, Federal Election Commission reports show.
As recently as Wednesday, Trump told CNN's Dana Bash that he would dramatically ramp up his donations to his campaign.
"I will have over $100 million in the campaign, and I'm prepared to go much more than that," he told Bash outside of his new hotel in Washington, DC, declining to offer an exact figure. "In the old days, you'd get credit: If you would spend less money and have victory, that would be a good thing. Today, they want you to spend money."
Trump has long been under pressure from allies and top fundraisers to give more to Trump Victory. CNN is told that earlier this month, Republican National Committee chair Reince Priebus asked him to put more of his own money into his campaign to better compete for advertising.
A source familiar with the conversation said Trump did not do as Priebus asked.
Click to expand...

 
langster said:


:nervous::nervous:

They scare me.
Click to expand...

They sound like the Christian politicians against universal health care or progressive social policies. Ignorance, jealousy, inferiority complex and bigotry are deadly diseases. Hillary has shown herself more as a Christian in her work than any republican politician I have seen in my lifetime. It is a sin to be this backward and should be prosecuted for endangering their offspring.
I blame their lying religious/political leaders that have not been educating instead feeding them half truths to mentally enslave them. Shame on them. Nothing in those beliefs are Christ like but angling for a societal coup d'etat.
 
unchanged_lineup said:
Is that real??? It looks like they've fired the student media club team they'd be paying on the cheap and now Eric Trump is making their videos on Windows Media Maker...
Click to expand...

Oh it's real alright. It's almost indiscernible form something you'd see in Grand Theft Auto.
 
langster said:
Hmmmm, well it's later in the week. I wonder what this is going to reveal? Or will it be much ado about nothing and speculation, rumour, hearsay or just bullshite?
Click to expand...

I think someone said back when I posted that Friday would be the day to bring up some big news for the weekend/weekly news cycle. So if nothing comes out today it'll be safe to assume that guy was talking a big ol bag o'shite. Seems ya can't even trust the republicans who are against Trump :smirk:
 
Loublaze said:
Why?
Click to expand...
I'll give you an honest answer. Because I'm an arsehole who would find it funny and cares more about his own amusement than the repercussions of it actually happening. Also I like Trump, he doesn't give a shite what people think of him.
 
LawCharltonBest said:
I'll give you an honest answer. Because I'm an arsehole who would find it funny and cares more about his own amusement than the repercussions of it actually happening. Also I like Trump, he doesn't give a shite what people think of him.
Click to expand...

To each their own, and I like a good pisstake myself, but that's pretty sad.
 
And yet another woman has come forward talking about Trumps sexual behaviour, from the TV show Shark Tank, claiming unwanted attention to her breasts when she was pregnant.
 
RexHamilton said:
Because not voting could be the difference in Trump becoming the next president or not. So the 52 million (or slightly more for this hypothetical, because I'm talking about him winning) who vote for him and the 120m who don't vote will have collectively ensured he becomes president. Then you have over the 150 million that I was talking about earlier. That's why it's worse. I get voter apathy. There are a certain amount of people who won't vote in any country. However, if the prospect of Donald Trump being your next president doesn't scare you into voting, then you're as bad as the ones that do vote for him and part of the problem.
Click to expand...

I'm done responding to you after this post.

Earlier you claimed 150m Americans had "bought into" Trump. There are two - and only two - relevant facts here:

1) Only those who vote for Trump can be fairly said to have "bought into" him.
2) Only around 52m Americans, on current polling evidence, will vote for Trump

52m is not 150m - geddit?
 
langster said:


:nervous::nervous:

They scare me.
Click to expand...

The ignorance on display there makes my head hurt. Also, the guy talking about "the enclaves"... Says he doesn't like it that "they" are trying to create an exclusivist culture and sees no irony in that whatsoever as he's surrounded by middle aged white "Christians".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.