2016 US Presidential Elections | Trump Wins

Status
Not open for further replies.
My biggest fear is if he somehow win it, bleak time even for non us.

His corporate tax cut is bullshit, and he's selfish enough to gain from it, the bad thing is that the whole world still needs us economy to be stable and in good condition whether we like her or hate her.

Unemployment in us is just one thing, disrupting the trade balance will have a catastrophic effect for anyone
 
Nothing against Michelle Obama but it's a bit bizarre how she is touted as a presidential candidate for the future after serving up platitudes in some speeches. I'm sure she is a bit embarrassed herself that just by not coming across as a sociopath makes you president material in some eyes. If people cared more about actual policies and reforms instead of cloud talk, clowns like Trump wouldn't leave the starting blocks.
 
Nothing against Michelle Obama but it's a bit bizarre how she is touted as a presidential candidate for the future after serving up platitudes in some speeches. I'm sure she is a bit embarrassed herself that just by not coming across as a sociopath makes you president material in some eyes. If people cared more about actual policies and reforms instead of cloud talk, clowns like Trump wouldn't leave the starting blocks.
I can't see her ever running but do you have in mind what experience would be needed? Given her early work and track record, I'm sure her policies would near mirror Barrack's.
 


:(

No words, just so very sad. While the rest of the world has evolved it seems Drumpf supporters are still stuck learning to walk upright.
 
Aye, his focus on the conflation between sex talk and sexual assault is spot on, everybody seems to be glossing over that.

Yeah, I thought it was excellent and he raised some great points. He definitely put the smack down on Drumpf too. I only hope the Ginger Whinger was watching.
 
Classy as always....


I wonder would his feelings be hurt if I stiffed him for work he done on my business, lost money in a bogus venture created by me, told him he was dumb and a loser, mocked a disabled family member of his, told him I will be dating his granddaughter in a few years and grabbed his daughters pussy, not his wife's though because look at her fat ugly face.
I wonder would he champion me for the highest office if I did all these things to him. My worry is how to placate these people when the election is over. More money in their pocket and better services and public infrastructure in their communities maybe a start but with them continuing to vote republican that will not happen unless it crumbles around them due to natural disaster. I found it worrying to hear that the average income for a trumpanzee is $70,000, this indicates to me that it is not so much the performance of the country but more irrational hatred.
It is so important that the Democrates play this right because these people are on a fast tract to enacting physical violence on innocent people just to satisfy their bigotry. We are looking at an early 1930s Germany playing out on a smaller scale in the US and if it is left to grow over the next for or five election cycles I will have to move my family out. I genuinely fear Trump and his band of cnuts are unleashing something very ugly that must be stopped in its tracks.
We always say Hollywood predicts or mirrors reality and any show or movie I watch in which white supremisists are portrayed there is always a smart calculated guy at the top who orchestrates from behind the curtain. Robert Mercer, the man who is paying for and running the Trump campaign needs to be brought in to the public arena, you know what the Kochs are about but this guy is a special kind of bastard to go from funding Cruz to funding Trump without batting an eyelid.
What I'm saying is that this distortion of decency may soon have someone smarter, not hard and less in you're face then Trump but far far more dangerous. Am I being a pussy or am I correct in using well documented history to predict a shit storm on the horizon?
 
I like Michelle but I see this notion of her being POTUS, whether serious consideration or just the possibility of, reeking of fanboism and romanticism much like numpties piping for Giggs or Ole being the future United manager.

Indeed. People need to drop the jingoism. Hillary had to serve as a senator and then secretary of state to be taken seriously for the role.
 
Indeed. People need to drop the jingoism. Hillary had to serve as a senator and then secretary of state to be taken seriously for the role.

And at the time of Bill's presidency we already heard of her involvement in policy and decision making. 8 years and we've heard little about that from Michelle. Not that its the First Lady/Gentleman's duty in any way, in fact I think Hillary was overstepping in a sense when she did. But yeah, if Michelle wants to be taken seriously as a politician she needs to go play the game. I don't even think she wants to, and again I don't think that's a better or worse attitude than the opposite.
 
Indeed. People need to drop the jingoism. Hillary had to serve as a senator and then secretary of state to be taken seriously for the role.

I agree with you completely, but you could counter those entry requirements with Donald Trump. If a man who specialises in failing at business and declaring himself bankrupt with no political experience whatsoever can run for president then imo so can someone who spent 8 years in the White House. They still know more about the role than Donald. Though I agree with you that both are ridiculous.
 
Last edited:
I agree with you completely, but you could counter those entry requirements with Donald Trump.

In fairness to Trump he's been running businesses. The amount of policy and governance in the corporate world means he has at least some experience in this.
 
Sickening stuff on CNN. They interviewed women, younger (teenagers or early twens) as well as seniors lining up at a Trump rally, if they aren't not disturbed about Donald Trump's sexual stuff.
Answers: 'Not at all.' 'It's a non-issue.'
One justifies it: 'Because Hillary is a crook.'
 
Last edited:


:(

No words, just so very sad. While the rest of the world has evolved it seems Drumpf supporters are still stuck learning to walk upright.


That is shocking. that footage alone should see Clinton walk this
 
I wonder if anyone has used that defense in court.
We need a special prosecutor when all this is over to go through all the allegations against him. Then we can see if He uses it in a court of law. It can be named the 'She's a 4 defense.' Let's see how successful it is with female jurors. Or right minded male ones.
 
She's the wrong person to treat like that. A very smart journalist. "Turn her mic off"...what a wanker.

Yep, Carson is just exposing himself as another holier than thou tosser. All the right wingers seem to be losing the plot as the prospects of losing a third consecutive Pres election looms.
 
Sickening stuff on CNN. They interviewed women, younger (teenagers or early twens) as well as seniors lining up at a Trump rally, if they aren't not disturbed about Donald Trump's sexual stuff.
Answers: 'Not at all.' 'It's a non-issue.'
One justifies it: 'Because Hillary is a crook.'
This really is quite the common occurrence these days, we even see it in debates on the CE Forum. People when presented with the wrong doing by one party will try to answer any question or statement about it with "Well about that other party that did this?" As if because one person/country doing something bad/illegal/immoral justifies others doing it as well. In truth I probably have done this myself, so not taking any sort of high horse here.

Seems many of us have forgotten the old adage of "Two wrongs not making a right."
 
So I watched Trumps Cincinatti rally last night on youtube and couldn't help wondering, Is anyone else here thinking that the US is going to become an extremely volatile place after the election? We have a fairly sizeable amount of people so deeply entrenched in their views they can't see (or chose to ignore) their candidate is not only completely unfit for office but unfit to meet basic levels of human decency. Tump's rallies also seem to be some sort of pseudo-white power nationalist gatherings and have already resorted to violence against peaceful protesters and minorities that don't share their views. They also believe the opposition is corrupt, have rigged the election & controls most of the mainstream media and should be in prison. and also see anyone who supports the Clinton campaign and anyone who meets their criteria as 'Liberals' as the enemy. Those folks are only going to become more and more entrenched in irrationality and wilful ignorance should Clinton win which all could well lead to civil unrest/violence.

Not good!
 


:lol: I know this has been posted before, but here it is again from a woman's point of view. Fecking priceless! He's done!


We had a poster who claimed he was suspicious about the Kardashian robbery because he could not understand how the robbers could have a hottie like Kim K. tied up in the bathroom and they did not sexually assault her. It's a weird way of looking at things for sure.
 
We had a poster who claimed he was suspicious about the Kardashian robbery because he could not understand how the robbers could have a hottie like Kim K. tied up in the bathroom and they did not sexually assault her. It's a weird way of looking at things for sure.


I'm surprised she didn't ask them to post some pics on Twitter for her as they had her tied up.
 
So I watched Trumps Cincinatti rally last night on youtube and couldn't help wondering, Is anyone else here thinking that the US is going to become an extremely volatile place after the election? We have a fairly sizeable amount of people so deeply entrenched in their views they can't see (or chose to ignore) their candidate is not only completely unfit for office but unfit to meet basic levels of human decency. Tump's rallies also seem to be some sort of pseudo-white power nationalist gatherings and have already resorted to violence against peaceful protesters and minorities that don't share their views. They also believe the opposition is corrupt, have rigged the election & controls most of the mainstream media and should be in prison. and also see anyone who supports the Clinton campaign and anyone who meets their criteria as 'Liberals' as the enemy. Those folks are only going to become more and more entrenched in irrationality and wilful ignorance should Clinton win which all could well lead to civil unrest/violence.

Not good!

Yeah I am a bit worried about the aftermath no matter who wins. I can see some Trump supporters going even more totally off the rails (how do you go more totally off the rails?) if he loses, especially if he continues with the "it was rigged" stuff. It will be worse if the election is close because then it will give them some sort of "evidence" to support their case, not any real evidence but stuff their small brains can believe is proof of a rigged outcome.

Now if, somehow, Trump wins, oh yeah I see lots of violence. I can see Trump supporters taking to the streets to celebrate and using it as an excuse to strike out at those they do not like. I can see plenty of people who don't support Trump, who have been threatened by Trump and his supporters, who have legitimate reasons to fear what will happen under Trump being willing to take to the streets which in some cases might include violence.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.